Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 1±Ç |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
33 ÆäÀÌÁö
If that contract creates a monopoly , or if the commission believes that it is in unreasonable restraint of trade in the coal business , then it would refuse necessarily to approve it . So that the commission at all times would stand in ...
If that contract creates a monopoly , or if the commission believes that it is in unreasonable restraint of trade in the coal business , then it would refuse necessarily to approve it . So that the commission at all times would stand in ...
35 ÆäÀÌÁö
... from the digging of the coal out of the ground to selling it in the market , to pass upon the legality of these contracts , so that if your contract or your combination which you propose is an illegal one you must not establish it ...
... from the digging of the coal out of the ground to selling it in the market , to pass upon the legality of these contracts , so that if your contract or your combination which you propose is an illegal one you must not establish it ...
61 ÆäÀÌÁö
Contracts , combinations , or conspiracies to control domestic enterprise in manufacture , agriculture , mining ... Again , all the authorities agree that in order to vitiate a contract or combination it is not essential that its result ...
Contracts , combinations , or conspiracies to control domestic enterprise in manufacture , agriculture , mining ... Again , all the authorities agree that in order to vitiate a contract or combination it is not essential that its result ...
71 ÆäÀÌÁö
That is to say , if I may put this in the form of a question , at the common law a contract or agreement in unreasonable restraint of trade was invalid ; it was not , however , criminal . Mr. Vinson . That is right , Senator .
That is to say , if I may put this in the form of a question , at the common law a contract or agreement in unreasonable restraint of trade was invalid ; it was not , however , criminal . Mr. Vinson . That is right , Senator .
85 ÆäÀÌÁö
The owners would sell these smaller mines to the larger one , but such contract of sale would violate this act , because it would entirely suppress all existing competition . They can not successfully compete with the larger concerns ...
The owners would sell these smaller mines to the larger one , but such contract of sale would violate this act , because it would entirely suppress all existing competition . They can not successfully compete with the larger concerns ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
ACTING CHAIRMAN agree agreement American Tobacco amount apply Attorney authority BAKER Bank believe bill capital carry cent Cigar coal combination commission committee common companies competition concerns Congress considered contract corporations course decision decree defendants Department effect enforcement engaged existing fact Federal further give given Government held hold individual industry interstate commerce legislation LEVY limited manufacturers MARTIN matter mean mining monopoly necessary objection operation opinion organization Panama parties person practically present President principle profit proposed question railroad reason referred regulate restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Senator POMERENE Senator TOWNSEND Sherman law statute Steel Street suggested Supreme Court thing tion trust understand United UNTERMYER Vinson violation York