Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 1±Ç |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
9 ÆäÀÌÁö
If we had done so and had put upon that commission the same class of men who have been appointed upon the Interstate Commerce Commission , we would have had the constant corrective power of that commission applied both to the existing ...
If we had done so and had put upon that commission the same class of men who have been appointed upon the Interstate Commerce Commission , we would have had the constant corrective power of that commission applied both to the existing ...
11 ÆäÀÌÁö
The management of these corporations is generally satisfactory to the stockholders ; they have confidence in the existing management , and in the great financial interests and institutions that usually control that management .
The management of these corporations is generally satisfactory to the stockholders ; they have confidence in the existing management , and in the great financial interests and institutions that usually control that management .
19 ÆäÀÌÁö
On the other hand , it takes the situation as it is ; it recognizes that there is a large degree of combination already existing , and it makes that condition a subject for supervision , study , and report to Congress .
On the other hand , it takes the situation as it is ; it recognizes that there is a large degree of combination already existing , and it makes that condition a subject for supervision , study , and report to Congress .
20 ÆäÀÌÁö
... demonstrated the effectiveness of that law to destroy existing combinations in restraint of interstate or international commerce and attempts to monopolize any part of it and to prevent renewed combination or monopolistic effort .
... demonstrated the effectiveness of that law to destroy existing combinations in restraint of interstate or international commerce and attempts to monopolize any part of it and to prevent renewed combination or monopolistic effort .
25 ÆäÀÌÁö
On the other hand , it takes the situation as it is , recognizes that there is a large degree of combination already existing , and makes that condition a subject for supervision , study , and report to Congress .
On the other hand , it takes the situation as it is , recognizes that there is a large degree of combination already existing , and makes that condition a subject for supervision , study , and report to Congress .
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
ACTING CHAIRMAN agree agreement American Tobacco amount apply Attorney authority BAKER Bank believe bill capital carry cent Cigar coal combination commission committee common companies competition concerns Congress considered contract corporations course decision decree defendants Department effect enforcement engaged existing fact Federal further give given Government held hold individual industry interstate commerce legislation LEVY limited manufacturers MARTIN matter mean mining monopoly necessary objection operation opinion organization Panama parties person practically present President principle profit proposed question railroad reason referred regulate restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Senator POMERENE Senator TOWNSEND Sherman law statute Steel Street suggested Supreme Court thing tion trust understand United UNTERMYER Vinson violation York