CHARLES COLLINS BUCK et al. STATE OF LOUISIANA. (October 22, 1894.) No. 735. In error to the supreme court of the state of Louisiana. Duane E. Fox, for plaintiffs in error. W. Hallett Phillips, H. J. Leovy, and M. J. Cunningham, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.

WILLIAM B. BURNET v. JOHN W. JACOBUS. (November 22, 1894.) No. 706. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. George Hoadly, for appellant. The Attorney General, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. George Hoadly, for the appellant.

EDWARD BYRNE v. UNITED STATES. (December 17, 1894.) No. 12. Appeal from the court of claims. See 24 Ct. Cl. 251. W. J. Mo berly, P. B. Thompson, and Allan Rutherford, for appellant. The Attorney General, for the United States. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, pursuant to the sixteenth rule.

JAMES T. CAMPBELL et al. v. RICHARD T. CARROLL. (April 15, 1895.) No. 382. In error to the supreme court of the state of Missouri. See 19 S. W. 809. John W. Noble, for plaintiffs in error. I. B. Dennis, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed with costs, on the authority of counsel for the plaintiffs in

error.

ROBERT CHARLSON V. UNITED STATES. (April 8, 1895.) No. 980. In error to the district court of the United States for the Northern district of Alabama. Sol. Gen. Conrad, for the United States. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Conrad, for the defendant in

error.

ROBERT J. CHESTER et al. v. J. H. & B. T. HILLSMAN et al. (April 26, 1895.) No. 329. In error to the supreme court of the state of Tennessee. J. B. Heiskell, for plaintiffs in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

CINCINNATI, H. & D. R. CO. v. WIL LIAM R. McKEEN. (January 28, 1895.) No. 892. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., for appellant. W. H. H. Miller, F. Winter, and John B. Elam, for appellee. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit denied. See 13 Sup. Ct. 840; 64 Fed. 36.

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. et al. (January 14, 1895.) No. 33. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Louisiana. E. A. O'Sullivan, for appellant. George Denegre and Walter D. Denegre, for appellees. No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs, for want of prosecution.

THE CITY OF WORCESTER ▼. THOMAS A. SCOTT. (September 6, 1894.) No. 185. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Connecticut. See 42 Fed. 913. Harrington Putnam, for appellant. Walter C. Noyes, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule.

CLEAVELAND FENCE CO. v. INDIANAPOLIS FENCE CO. et al. (October 11, 1894.) No. 32. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana. See 42 Fed. 911. Augustus L. Mason, for appellant. Chester Bradford, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

CONTINENTAL INS. CO. OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNION INS. CO. OF PHIL ADELPHIA. (January 17, 1895.) No. 241. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. See 51 Fed. 884. Thomas H. Hubbard, for plaintiff in error. Joseph H. Choate, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed per stipulation.

COUNTY COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY et al. v. UNITED STATES ex rel. WILLIAM F. SHELLEY. (January 25, 1895.) No. 183. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Missouri. See 30 Fed. 603. J. H. Overall, for plaintiffs in error. W. B. Homer, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the sixteenth rule, on motion of Mr. W. B. Homer, for the defendant in error.

COUNTY COURT OF WAYNE COUNTY V. SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS. (February 4, 1895.) No. 209. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of West Virginia. Jas. F. Brown, for plaintiff in error. Henry C. Simms and F. B. Enslow, for defendant in error. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest, by a divided court.

LEONARD DANIELS v. THEODORE S. CASE et al. (September 10, 1894.) No. 211. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Missouri. See 45 Fed. 843. S. B. Ladd, for plaintiff in error. Daniel B. Holmes, for defendants in error. No opinion. Dismissed pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule.

THOMAS DEVLIN v. WILLIAM HEISE et al. (January 25, 1895.) No. 187. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Maryland. See 43 Fed. 795. Benjamin Price, for appellant. W. B. H. Dowse and John R. Bennett, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

DIEFENTHAL & SALOMON v. HAMBURG-AMERICKANISCHER PACKET FAHRT AKTIEN GESELLSHAFT. (March 26, 1895.) No. 237. Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Eastern district of Louisiana. See 46 Fed. 397. J. R. Beckwith, for appellants. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

J. J. DILLARD v. E. S. MOORMAN. (November 21, 1894.) No. 96. In error to the corporation court of Lynchburg, Va. W. W. Larkin, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

HARRIET TUTTLE DRAKE et al. v. RACHEL REGGEL et al. (January 28, 1895.) No. 856. Appeal from the supreme court of the territory of Utah. See 37 Pac. 583. J. G. Sutherland and J. W. Judd, for appellants No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the appellants.

DUBUQUE & S. C. R. CO. et al. v. THOMAS SNELL. (January 28, 1895.) No. 201. In error to the supreme court of the state of Iowa. E. S. Bailey and Theodore Hawley, for plaintiffs in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

EASTERN OREGON GOLD MIN. CO., Limited, v. C. S. MILLER. (April 3, 1895.) No. 247. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon. See 45 Fed. 345. John Mullan and Frank V. Drake, for plaintiff in error. John H. Mitchell and John M. Gearin, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the sixteenth rule, on motion of Mr. J. H. Mitchell, for the defendant in error.

EAST LAKE LAND CO. v. ISAIAH C. BROWN. (December 17, 1894.) No. 121. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Alabama. John T. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. D. P. Bestor, for defendant in error. No opinion. Judgment reversed, with costs, on the authority of Chappell v. Waterworth, 155 U. S. 102, 15 Sup. Ct. 34, and cause remanded to the said circuit court, with a direction to remand it to the city court of Birmingham, county of Jefferson, Ala.

GRATIOT COUNTY v. HENRY M. AYLESWORTH. (April 22, 1895.) No. 292. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Michigan. See 43 Fed. 350. Charles J. Willett, for plaintiff in error. Thomas S. Jerome, for defendant in error. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest, by a divided court.

GREENWOOD DISTRICT OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY v. MISSOURI & A. MINING & LUMBER CO. (January 11, 1895.) No. 147. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Arkansas. John H. Rogers, for plaintiff in error. E. D. Kenna, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO. v. P. JOHNSON & SON. (May 6, 1895.) No. 350. In error to Coleman county court, Tex. A. T. Britton, A. B. Browne, J. W. Terry, and George R. Peck, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Judgment reversed, with costs, on the authority of Railway Co. v. Hefley (No. 255 on the docket for the present term) 15 Sup. Ct. 802, and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the court in that

case.

MAYER HALFF et al. v. JOHN W. PHIL LIPS et al. (November 22, 1894.) No. 98. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas. Rufus W. Thayer, for appellants. Wm. Allen Butler, Gist Blair, and Adrian H. Joline, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

HAT SWEAT MANUF'G CO. v. DAVIS SEWING MACH. CO. et al. (January 11, 1895.) No. 145. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of New York. See 40 Fed. 154. John R. Bennett. for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

RE

HAVEMEYER & ELDER SUGAR FINING CO. v. DANIEL MAGONE, Collector. (April 8, 1895.) No. 243. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. Edwin B. Smith, for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for defendant in error. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, by a divided court.

GEORGE D. HAVEN v. ARCHIBALD BORLAND. (October 10, 1894.) No. 23. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of California. See 37 Fed. 394. W. W. Cope, for plaintiff in error. G. W. Towle, Jr., for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the nineteenth rule.

GEORGE HAYES v. VALENTINE FISCHER (October 8, 1894.) No. 257. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. Livingston Gifford, for appellant. Edmund Wetmore, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed per stipulation.

JAMES C. HAYS v. MAHLON APGAR. (May 3, 1895.) No. 332. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of New Jersey. D. M. Porter, for appellant. Gilbert Collins, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, each party to pay his own costs, per stipulation.

ROBERT HITCHCOCK et al. v. WANZER LAMP CO. et al. (January 24, 1895.) No. 177. Appeal from the circuit court of the

United States for the Northern district of New York. See 45 Fed. 362. Anthony Pollok, for appellants. E. H. Brown, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

WILLIAM L. HUNTER v. UNITED STATES. (April 15, 1895.) No. 989. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Georgia. Sol. Gen. Conrad, for the United States. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Conrad, for the defendant in erгог.

R. G. HUSTON et al. v. LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN R. CO. et al. (January 24, 1895.) No. 300. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Tennessee. See 44 Fed. 449. J. D. Brannon and J. S. Pilcher, for appellants. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the appellants.

CLEMENT T. HYDE et al. v. ANDREW HOGUE et al. (April 9, 1895.) No. 288. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of West Virginia. T. B. Swann, for appellants. J. F. Brown, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

INLAND & COASTWISE TRANSP. CO. OF BALTIMORE et al. V. JOSEPH CORNELL et al. (January 15, 1895.) No. 159. Appeal from the supreme court of the District of Columbia. W. Willoughby, for appellants. J. A. Hyland, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

THE IRON CHIEF. HENRY WINEMAN, JR., V. THE IRON CHIEF. (January 7, 1895.) No. 864. H. C. Wisner, for appellant. Harvey D. Goulder, for appellee. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Sixth circuit denied. See 63 Fed. 289.

JOHN J. JOHNSON V. KATE VAN WYCK. (March 4, 1895.) No. 929. In error to the court of appeals for the District of Columbia. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. William F. Mattingly, for the defendant in error.

WILLIAM H. JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (November 12, 1894.) No. 78. In error to the supreme court of appeals of the state of Virginia. W. W. Larkin, for plaintiff in error. R. Taylor Scott, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

W. D. KENNER v. STEPHEN BITELY. (April 8, 1895.) No. 279. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Virginia. See 45 Fed. 133. John A. Buchanan, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

ROBERT M. KING v. W. S. JACKSON. (March 14, 1895.) No. 334. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Tennessee. Don M. Dickinson, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, the cause having abated owing to the death of the appellant, on motion of Mr. Don M. Dickinson, for the appellant.

ARTHUR KIRK ▼. JOHN E. DU BOIS. (October 8, 1894.) No. 259. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Pennsylvania. See 46 Fed. 486. W. Bakewell, for appellant. G. A. Jenks, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant.

SHERMAN W. KNEVALS v. FLORIDA CENT. & P. R. CO. et al. (May 20, 1895.) No. 1,001. H. Bisbee, James E. Padgett, and Edwin Forrest, for appellant. Samuel F. Phillips, Frederic D. McKenney, and Julien T. Davies, for appellees. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Fifth circuit denied. See 66 Fed. 224.

THOMAS F. LAWSON v. W. S. KELLY. (March 25, 1895.) No. 397. In error to the supreme court of the state of Texas. See 17 S. W. 717. Walter Gresham, for plaintiff in error. S. R. Fisher, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

CHARLES W. LEACH et al. v. WATERVALE MIN. CO. OF CHICAGO. (May 20, 1895.) No. 556. Appeal from the supreme court of the territory of Arizona. See 33 Pac. 418. A. T. Britton and A. B. Browne, for appellants. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. A. B. Browne, for the appellants.

JOHN H. LINCK v. SALT LAKE CITY et al. (January 10, 1895.) No. 882. Appeal from the supreme court of the territory of Utah. See 21 Pac. 459. J. L. Rawlins, for appellees. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. L. Rawlins, for the appellees.

PATRICK MCALEER et al. v. ALICE S. HILL (April 29, 1895.) No. 331. In error to the supreme court of the state of Washington. See 27 Pac. 557. M. D. Brainard, Charles K. Jenner, and Louis Henry Legg, for plaintiffs in error. J. J. Darlington, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

GEORGE M. McDONALD et al. v. UNITED STATES. (December 12, 1894.) No. 849. William H. Barnum, for plaintiffs in error. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit denied. See 66 Fed. 255.

CHARLES MCSORLEY et al. v. ALICE S. HILL. (April 30, 1895.) No. 340. In error to the supreme court of the state of Washington. See 27 Pac. 552. Charles K. Jenner, M. D. Brainard, and Louis Henry Legg, for plaintiffs in error. J. J. Darlington, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

THOMAS MADDOCK ▼. JONATHAN COXON et al. (January 16, 1895.) No. 163. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of New Jersey. See 45 Fed. 578. F. C. Lowthorp, for appellant. W. B. Preble, Jr., for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

J. J. MALLAN et al. v. JOHN W. BRANSFORD. (November 12, 1894.) No. 79. In er ror to the supreme court of appeals of the state of Virginia. See 10 S. E. 977. W. W. Larkin, for plaintiffs in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

MICHAEL FRANCIS MALOY ▼. HERMANN DUDEN. (April 22, 1895.) No. 985. W. D. Davidge, Wm. McArthur, and D. M. Neuberger, for appellant. Ronald K. Brown, for appellee. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit denied. See 63 Fed. 183.

JEROME F. MANNING v. IRVINE G. McLARREN. (January 9, 1895.) No. 62. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States

for the district of Massachusetts. Jerome F. Marning, in pro. per. Joseph B. Warner, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed. with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

NATHAN MARCUS v. UNITED STATES. (March 29, 1895.) No. 692. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. See 53 Fed. 784. Abram J. Rose, for plaintiff in error. Sol. Gen. Conrad, for the United States. No opinion. Dismissed per stipulation.

MARION COUNTY, TEX., v. W. N. COLER & CO. (May 6, 1895.) No. 992. A. H. Garland and R. C. Garland, for plaintiff in error. W. S. Herndon, for defendants in error. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Fifth circuit denied. See 67 Fed. 60.

GEORGE MASON v. HARVEY SPAL DING. (October 24, 1894.) No. 351. Appeal from the supreme court of the District of Columbia. W. L. Cole, for appellant. W. Willoughby, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. W. L. Cole, for the appellant.

JOHN D. MAYFIELD et al. v. M. T. MATTA. (October 9, 1894.) No. 126. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas. E. H. Graham, for plaintiffs in error. Eugene Williams, for defendant in error. No opinion. Judgment reversed, at cost of plaintiffs in error, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law.

NICHOLAS MAZARAKOS v. UNITED STATES. (October 23, 1894.) No. 569. In error to the district court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois. Woodbury Blair, for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, for the United States. No opinion. Dismissed pursuant to the tenth rule.

M. H. MEEKS v. CHRISTINA SCHALL et al. (April 11, 1895.) No. 294. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Alabama. J. M. Head, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

THE MICHIGAN. B. FRANK NEALLEY et al. V. THE MICHIGAN. (December 3, 1894.) No. 847. Eugene P. Carver and Robert H. Smith, for appellants. J. Wilson Leakin and Harrington Putnam, for appellee. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Fourth circuit denied. See 63 Fed. 280, 295.

CHARLES A. MILLER v. WESTERN UNION TEL. CO. (November 14, 1894.) No. 88. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio. Thomas McDougall, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence Maxwell. Jr., for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

THE MONTCLAIR. THE MONTCLAIR v. EASTON & A. R. CO. (April 22, 1895.) No. 984. George Bethune Adams and FrankFin A. Wilcox, for appellant. W. W. Goodrich, for appellee. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circnit court of appeals for the Second circuit denied. See 67 Fed. 156.

CHARLES MORAN et al. v. J. C. HAGERMAN et al. (March 11, 1895.) No. 909. Wheeler H. Peckham, for appellants. Horatio C. King, W. E. F. Deal, and Edmund Tauszky, v.15s.c.-66

NATIONAL DREDGING CO. v. STATE OF ALABAMA. (March 8, 1895.) No. 522. In error to the supreme court of the state of Alabama. See 12 South. 720. Gaylord B. Clark and Anthony Higgins, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. OF MONTPELIER, VT., v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF HURON, S. D. (May 20, 1895.) No. 1,005. N. T. Guernsey, for plaintiff in error. R. J. Wells, for defendant in error. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit denied. See 62 Fed. 778.

NEW YORK. L. E. & W. R. CO. v. ANDREW BROWN. (January 17, 1895.) No. 202. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. Frederick B. Jennings, for plaintiff in error. F. H. Betts, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed per stipulation.

NEW YORK, L. E. & W. R. CO. v. LAURA F. RUSH. (February 4, 1895.) No. 207. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Ohio. W. E. Cushing and S. E. Williamson, for plaintiff in error. Thomas W. Sanderson and Myron A. Norris, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation.

NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. v. EUDORA V. SMITH. (April 22, 1895.) No. 964. George W. Hubbell, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit denied. See 67 Fed. 694.

NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. HENRY BUSH. (October 8, 1894.) No. 28. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois. George Willard, James McNaught, and A. H. Garland, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. A. H. Garland, for the plaintiff in error.

NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. GEORGE C. RAGSDALE. (May 1, 1895.) No. 344. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota. See 42 Fed. 383.

James McNaught, A. H. Garland, and W. J. Curtis, for plaintiff in erron Moses E. Clapp, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed. with costs, on motion of Mr. R. C. Garland, for the plaintiff in error.

OAKLAND ELECTRIC LIGHT & MOTOR CO. v. NATHANIEL S. KEITH. (April 9, 1895.) No. 287. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of California. M. A. Wheaton, for plaintiff in error. M. M. Estee, W. W. Dudley, L. T. Michener, and John H. Miller, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP CO. V. UNITED STATES. (February 4, 1895.) No. 123. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Washington. J. C. Haines, A. H. Holmes, and Stephen M. White, for appellant. The Attorney General, for the United States. No opinion. Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney General Conrad, for the appellee.

O. W. RASH v. JOHN W. S. FARLEY. (May 6, 1895.) No. 325. In error to the court of appeals of the state of Kentucky. John H. Rogers, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Emert v. Missouri (No. 120 on the docket for the present term) 15 Sup. Ct. 367.

EDWARD S. RITCHIE ▼. GEORGE W. MERRILL et al. (April 23, 1895.) No. 315. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. Charles A. Peabody and Charles H. Drew, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

ROYAL CLAY MANUF'G CO. v. CHICAGO SEWER-PIPE & COAL CO. (May 20, 1895.) No. 672. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois. S. S. Gregory, William M. Booth, and James S. Harlan, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error.

HERMAN ROYER v. SHULTZ BELTING CO. (January 29, 1895.) No. 213. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Missouri. See 45 Fed. 51. J. O. Broadhead, for plaintiff in error. Chester H. Krum, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. S. P. LEEP. (December 10, 1894.) No. 722. In error to the supreme court of the state of Arkansas. John F. Dillon and Winslow S. Pierce, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. John F. Dillon, for plaintiff in error. See 25 S. W. 75.

W. P. SAYWARD et al. v. THOMAS NUNAN et al. (January 7, 1895.) No. 881. In

error to the supreme court of the state of Washington. See 32 Pac. 1022. Edward B. Whitney, for defendants in error. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr Edward B. Whitney, for the defendants in error.

CHARLES SCHEELE V. JEREMIAH LORDAN. (November 12, 1894.) No. 80. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Texas. J. M. Burroughs, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

DAVID SCHREINER v. JULIA S. SMITH et al. (January 16, 1895.) No. 210. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois. See 38 Fed. 897. I. C. Sloan and A. R. Bushnell, for appellant. Jas. L. High, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the appellant.

HARRIET S. SELLERS v. H. C. MILLER et al. (November 6, 1894.) No. 252. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas. F. Chas. Hume and E. H. Graham, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant.

J. W. SEXTON et al. v. HENRY JONES et al. (March 28, 1895.) No. 246. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon. Frank V. Drake, for appellants. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

ROLAND H. SMITH et al. v. PITTSBURGH GAS CO. (October 12, 1894.) No. 42. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Pennsylvania. See 42 Fed. 145. D. F. Patterson, for appellants. W. Bakewell, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

SOUTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. JOSEPH R GRAHAM et al. (March 7, 1895.) No. 116. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of California. J. Hubley Ashton, for appellant. W. B. Wallace and J. H. Call, for appellees. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, for the appellant.

SOUTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. SAMUEL Mc CUTCHEON. (March 7, 1895.) No. 115. Ap peal from the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of California. J. Hubley Ashton, for appellant. W. B. Wallace, George W. Merrill, and J. H. Call, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, for the appellant.

SOUTHERN PAC. R. Co. v. UNITED STATES. (October 8, 1894.) No. 35. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of California Henry Beard, Charles H. Tweed, and J. Hubley Ashton, for appellant. The Attorney General, for the United States. No opinion. Dismissed on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, for the appellant.

JOHN S. STANTON et al. v. UNION TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK et al. (April 30. 1895.) No. 335. Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the District of Kansas. Lucern Birdseye, for appellants. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

JOHN H. TENNANT et al. v. H. W. DUDLEY et al. (March 4, 1895.) No. 93. In er ror to the circuit court of the United States for