ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

93-197

Y 4. Ag8: In 7 EXTENSION OF THE FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND GENERAL LEGISLATION

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON
AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION,
AND FORESTRY

UNITED STATES SENATE

NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

JUNE 8 AND 9, 1977

Printed for the use of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

SUBCOMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND GENERAL LEGISLATION PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman

JAMES B. ALLEN, Alabama JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi RICHARD B. STONE, Florida HERMAN E. TALMADGE, Georgia

RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana
ROBERT DOLE, Kansas

MILTON R. YOUNG, North Dakota S. I. HAYAKAWA, California (II)

CONTENTS

[blocks in formation]

Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from Vermont, opening statement_

CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

EXTENSION OF THE FEDERAL INSECTICIDE,
FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 1977

U.S. SENATE,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH

AND GENERAL LEGISLATION OF THE

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND FORESTRY,

Washington, D.C.

The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:40 a.m., in room 324, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. Patrick J. Leahy (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

Present: Senators Leahy, Allen, Curtis, and Lugar.

STATEMENT OF HON. PATRICK J. LEAHY, A U.S. SENATOR FROM VERMONT

Senator LEAHY. The subcommittee will come to order.

I am Patrick Leahy, the junior Senator from Vermont, and with me today is Senator Richard Lugar, the junior Senator from Indiana. Today's hearing by the Subcommittee on Agricultural Research and General Legislation is on the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act as amended. As we all know, the purpose of this act is twofold. First to control the production and use of pesticides which are potentially harmful to both humans and the environment. The second purpose is to assure the availability of pesticides to agriculture, health facilities, industry, and homeowners for the control of pests.

Since the passage of Public Law 92-516 in 1972, there has been intensive controversy surrounding the implementation and direction of this legislation. There has been widespread agreement that the basic purposes of the act are appropriate, but there has been severe criticism of how EPA administers the act. Now, there is probably some basis for these charges. However, I think it should be remembered, and I certainly see that in the mail that I get in my own office, that some people have argued that EPA is going too slowly while others are charging EPA is overly zealous in enforcement of the program.

You also know that earlier this year the Senate Committee on Agriculture had 1 day of hearings on FIFRA in conjunction with the farm bill. This was in anticipation of the need to provide for an extension of FIFRA, following along the line of some of the hearings that I was present at last year on this whole subject. However, it became very evident to us that there were problems that demanded additional

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »