 | 1947 - 718 페이지
...is no twilight zone between abnormality and insanity. An offender is wholly sane or wholly insane. "A. complete reconciliation between the medical tests...most cases morally responsible for what they do." [Emphasis supplied.] The court then went on to explain what would be required before a conviction hi... | |
 | Robert McGee - 2005 - 436 페이지
...Judge Thurman Arnold in Holloway v. United States, 148 F.2d 665, 667 (DC Cir. 1945) (observing that "the common belief that men who talk rationally are...in most cases morally responsible for what they do" and approving the criminal law's tolerance of the beliefs persistence). Volume 2 (2004) study "revealed... | |
 | 2001 - 1948 페이지
...right. As the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said in the Holloway case, supra, page 667. 'A complete reconciliation between the medical tests...most cases morally responsible for what they do.' ' (Opinion by Chief Judge Quinn.) Judge Latimer concurs in the result without opinion. Judge Ferguson,... | |
| |
For that reason, the principal function of a psychiatrist who testifies on the mental state of an abnormal offender is to inform the jury of the character of his mental disease. The psychiatrist's moral judgment reached on the basis of his observations... 