Doe v. Hogg (Ejectment-Covenant not to assign, construction
of)

v. Sparkes (Ejectment-Devise)

-

Duncan v. Carlton (Time for pleading to Essoign declarations—

Judgment-Practice)

Page

• 226

- 246

Edge v. Frost (Guarantee-Joinder of Counts-Practice-Bail) 243
Edwards v. Tucker (Insolvent Act-Second arrest-Practice) 216
Gilbert v. Tomison (Trespass-Exception of Custom)
Guthrie v. Ford (Habeas Corpus-Practice)

- 222

- 271

Hancock v. Southall (Variance-Pleading-Evidence)

- 202

Harrison v. Bainbridge (Costs in Equity-Set off-Lien—
Practice)

- 363

In re Rix (Record of Conviction, form of—3 G. 4. c. 23., con-
struction of Mandamus)

Anonymous (Attachment--Bail)

Kennard v. Harris (Award-Costs-Practice)

Knott v. Farren (Statute of Limitations—Pleading)

Lee v. Goodlad (Inferior Court-Certiorari-Practice-51G.3.

c. 124, s. S., construction of)

Memoranda

Morgan v. Palmer (Notice of Action-Fees-Justices)

Parker v. Bailey (Form of Action-Practice)

Phillips v. Whitmore (Insolvent Debtors' Act, 3 G. 4. c. 123.,

construction of)

- 347

Place v. Jackson (Inclosure Act-Right of common)

Ravenga v. Mackintosh (Malicious arrest-Practice)

- 318

- 187

Rex v. Aire and Calder Navigation, the Company of Proprie-
tors of the (Rates, form of)

v. Bathwick (Settlement by renting a tenement-Evidence) $35

v. Gainsbury (9 G. 1. c. 22. s. 8., construction of-Evidence
Pleading)

v. Hallow (Settlement by hiring and service)

v. Iddesleigh (Settlement by apprenticeship)

v. Ilchester, Mayor, &c. of (Mandamus)

355

- 250

- 299

- 332

- 324

v. Lydd (Settlement by hiring and service - Exceptive
hiring)

295

Page

Rex v. Market Bosworth (Settlement by hiring and service)
v. Marsh (Game conviction, form of—5 Ann. c. 14. s. 2.,
construction of)

- 306

- 260

v. Middlesex (County Court, fees legally to be taken in) 273
v. Northweald Bassett (Settlement by dower)

v. Perkins (Charter—who shall be free burgesses in Col-
chester)

- 276

v. Polesworth (Settlement by hiring and service-Excep-
tive hiring)

v. St. Mary (Settlement by hiring and service-Connected
service)

Robinson v. Vale (Damages in an action of tort, a debt within

the 46 G. 3. c. 135, proveable, &c.)

Scuerhop v. Schmanuel (Affidavit of debt-Practice)
Shaw v. Hislop (Joinder of parties-Plea in abatement-Costs.
Practice)

427

258

309

430

- 180

Simonds v. White (Average loss to be adjusted at the ship's port

of destination)

Simpson v. Routh (27 G. 2. c. 20. s. 2., construction of--Over

seers of Poor, notice of action against—Pleading)

241

375

- 181

Swaine v. Bland (Bail bond, when not to be cancelled-Practice) 373 Thomas v. Pearce (Service of process-Practice)

Thwaites v. Gallington (Bail-Practice)

v. Piper (Attorney's bill-Practice)

Weaver v. Lloyd (Libel, justification of-Pleading)

- 317

- 365

- 194

- 230

Williams v. Lord Bagot (Inferior Court-Certiorari-Practice) 315

-v. Glenister (1 W. & M. c. 13. s. 18., construction of -Pleading)

217

In the Press, and will be ready for delivery in January next,

A TREATISE

ON THE

JURISDICTION OF COURTS OF EQUITY IN MATTERS OF FRAUD.

BY JOHN EYKIN HOVENDEN, Esq.

OF GRAY'S INN, BARRISTER AT LAW.

This Work will present a compressed, but general, view of the principles and authorities according to which Equity, in the correction of Frauds, is administered in the Court of Chancery; whether under its prescriptive or statutory Jurisdiction; whether sitting in Equity, or Bankruptcy; or by virtue of a specially delegated power of administration, as in cases of Lunacy. The slight differences in point of form, and the diversity in some few instances, as to the extent of relief given by the Court of Exchequer in equitable causes, will be duly noticed: and Illustrations of the several heads of the subject, by reference to collateral decisions of Courts of Common Law, will not be overlooked.

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

COURT OF KING'S BENCH

IN

TRINITY TERM,

IN THE FIFTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF GEORGE IV.

MEMORANDA.

SIR John Richardson, Knight, one of the puisne Judges of the Court of Common Pleas, retired from the Bench in consequence of ill health.

Stephen Gaselee, Esq. one of His Majesty's Counsel learned in the law, was appointed one of the puisne Judges of the Court of Common Pleas, in the room of Sir John Richardson, Knt.; and being called to the degree of a Serjeant at Law, gave rings with the motto " Bonis legibus, judiciis gravibus." Towards the close of this Term he took his seat on the Bench.

R. Spankie, Esq. of the Honorable Society of Inner Temple, Barrister at Law, was called to the degree of a Serjeant at Law, and gave rings with the motto "Bonis legibus, judiciis gravibus."

John Adams, Esq. of the Honorable Society of Middle Temple, Barrister at Law, was called to the degree of a Serjeant at Law, and gave rings with the motto "Bonis legibus, judiciis gracibus."

1824.

The KING v. The INHABITANTS of CATESBY. (a)

Wherea parish TWO Justices, by their order, removed George Cox, his

certificate was

described

granted by two wife and their child from the parish of Badby to the parish persons, who of Catesby, both in the county of Northampton. On apthemselves on peal, the sessions confirmed the order, subject to the opinion of this Court upon a case which stated,

the face of it

to be, "the only churchwarden, and

the only over

seer of the poor of the

That George Cox, Ann, his wife, and their child Mary Ann, were removed by an order of justices from the parish of Badby, in the county of Northampton, to the parish of parish" Held, Catesby, in the same county. This order was appealed after a lapse of 63 years, in the against; and on the hearing of the appeal, the respondents absence of evi- produced a certificate, of which the following is a copy :Northamptonshire to wit.-In pursuance of a late act of parliament, intitled "An Act for supplying some defects in the law for the relief of the poor of this Kingdom," We, William Goodman, the only churchwarden, and Edward Webb, the only overseer of the poor of the parish of Cates

dence to the

contrary, that the Court

would intend, first, that the parish had by

custom but one church

that one had

warden; and second, that by, in the said county of Northampton, do hereby certify there had been the churchwardens and overseers of the poor of the parish originally two overseers, but of Badby, in the said county of Northampton, that we do own and acknowledge Thomas Cox the younger, of Badby died, and consequently, that aforesaid, butcher, and Mary his wife, and Richard, John, the certificate and Elizabeth, their children, to be inhabitants legally setwas valid, as having been tled in our said parish of Catesby. And we do hereby granted by a majority of the oblige ourselves, the said churchwarden and overseers of existing body the poor of Catesby aforesaid, and our successors for the time being, to receive and provide for the said Thomas Cox meaning of the and Mary his wife, and the said Richard, John, and Elizabeth, their children, and all other the children which the

of overseers,

within the

Certificate

Act, 8 & 9
W. 3. c. 30.

(a) A warrant under the Royal Sign Manual having issued ten days before the end of Easter Term, pursuant to 3 Geo. 4. c. 102. the puisne Judges of this Court sat in a room adjoining the Guildhall at Westminster, from the 1st to the 16th June, both days inclusive, for the dispatch of business, when this and the following cases were decided.