For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

(Cal. App.) 180 P. 30.
"Dangerous instrumentality."-Moore v. Roddie
(Wash.) 180 P. 879.
"Delivery."-Noble v. People (Colo.) 180 P.

not only as a circumstance tending to create [ "Damage by the elements."-Hamer v. Ellis
feeling, but also as involving conduct expressive
of feeling; but the inquiry should be strictly
limited to what is necessary to show the extent
or degree of bias or prejudice, and care should
be exercised to avoid obscuring real issue.-
State v. Beaton, 180 P. 146.

(D) Inconsistent Statements by Witness.
388(2) (Cal.App.) Question to a witness,
"Did you ever make any statement to that ef
fect when you were on the former trial of this
case?" was properly excluded, where defendant
did not lay proper foundation for the question
by calling the witness' particular attention to
any former testimony given by her.-People v.
Richaud, 180 P. 50.

392 (1) (Cal.) A letter written to witness'
brother by witness' mother was inadmissible
upon cross-examination of witness, although
it contained some alleged statements of wit-
ness at variance with his testimony; such evi-
dence being hearsay, and it not being shown
that witness was in any way responsible for
it.-Campbell v. Genshlea, 180 P. 336.

WORDS AND PHRASES.

"Accident."-Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime &
Portland Cement Co. (Kan.) 180 P. 793.
"Acknowledgment."--Nixon v. Ramsey (Cal.
App.) 180 P. 649.

"Act."-Herbring v. Brown (Or.) 180 P. 328.
"Action at law."-Board of Com'rs of El Paso

County v. City of Colorado Springs (Colo.)
180 P. 301.

"Actual damages."-Winans v. Chapman (Kan.)
180 P. 266.

"Aggrieved."--Patten & Davis Lumber Co. v.
Inman (Cal. App.) 180 P. 26.
"Anywhere."-Dabney v. Connecticut Fire Ins.
Co. (Kan.) 180 P. 784.
"Arising out of and in course of employment."-
Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corporation v.
Pallaro (Colo.) 180 P. 95.

"Arising out of employment."-Smith v. Kaw
Boiler Works Co. (Kan.) 180 P. 259; Gilli-
land v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement
Co., Id. 793.

"Assessment."-Flinn v. Zerbe (Cal. App.) 180
P. 650.

"Bill."-Herbring v. Brown (Or.) 180 P. 328.
"Boarding house keeper."-McIntosh v. Schops
(Or.) 180 P. 593.

v.

562.

"Delusion."-In re Sturtevant's Estate (Or.)
180 P. 595.

.

180 P. 125.

"End of trial."-Bublitz v. Reeves (Cal. App.)
180 P. 28.
"Equitable action."--State v. Ronald (Wash.)
"Evidence reasonably tending to support ver-
dict."-Tate v. Colgate State Bank (Okl.)
180 P. 687.
"False representation."-Bowman v. Provident
Realty Inv. Co. (Cal. App.) 180 P. 18.
"Federal census."-In re Cleveland's Claim
"Final census."-In re Cleveland's Claim (Okl.)
(Okl.) 180 P. 852.

180 P. 852.

"Full answer."-Wyatt v. Collins (Kan.) 180
"Gilt edge."-Martin v. Moreland (Or.) 180 P.

P. 789.

933.

"Guest."-McIntosh v. Schops (Or.) 180 P.

593.

"Holder in due course."-E. D. Fisher Lumber
& Coal Co. v. Robbins (Kan.) 180 P. 264.
"Innkeeper."-McIntosh v. Schops (Or.) 180
P. 593.
"Intoxicating liquor."-McLean V. People
(Colo.) 180 P. 676.

"Joint resolution."-Herbring v. Brown (Or.)
180 P. 328.
“Judgment."-San Diego Inv. Co. v. Crane
(Cal. App.) 180 P. 837.
"Labor."-Multnomah County v. United States
Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Or.) 180 P. 104.
"Local concern."-Board of Com'rs of El Paso
County v. City of Colorado Springs (Colo.)
180 P. 301.

"Lodger."-McIntosh v. Schops (Or.) 180 P.

593.

"Lodginghouse keeper."-McIntosh v. Schops
(Or.) 180 P. 593.

"Manager."-Sullivan v. Evans-Morris-Whitney
Co. (Utah) 180 P. 435.
"Manual labor."-Arizona Eastern R. Co. v.
Matthews (Ariz.) 180 P. 159.
"Material to be used or consumed."-Consoli-
dated Lumber Co. v. Bosworth (Cal. App.)
180 P. 60.

"Mechanical labor."-Arizona Eastern R. Co.
v. Matthews (Ariz.) 180 P. 159.
"More or less."-McCombs v. Church (Cal.)
180 P. 535.

"Murder."-Allen v. State (Okl. Cr. App.) 180
P. 564.

180 P. 633.

"Business of public character."-Coombs
Burk (Cal. App.) 180 P. 59.
"Care."-Alberty v. Alberty (Okl.) 180 P. 370.
"Change of occupation."-Union Health & Ac-
cident Co. v. Anderson (Colo.) 180 P. 81;"Net profits."-Cuneo v. Giannini (Cal. App.)
Jaques v. Order of United Commercial Trav-
elers of America (Kan.) 180 P. 200.
"Children."-In re Hutton's Estate (Wash.)
180 P. 882.
"Collusion."-Bice v. Nelson (Kan.) 180 P. 206.
"Commercial indorsement."-E. D. Fisher
Lumber & Coal Co. v. Robbins (Kan.) 180
P. 204.

V. Hartnett

"Common carrier."-Engstrand
(Wash.) 180 P. 132.
"Contemplation of death."-In re Minor's Es-
tate (Cal.) 180 P. 813.

"Contingent claim."-Sharp v. Sharp (Utah)
180 P. 580.

"Continuing offense."-State v. Meeks (N. M.)
186 P. 295.
"Continuous transaction."-International Trust
Co. v. Clark Hardware Co. (Colo.) 180 P.
300.
"Contract."-Irwin v. Silva (Cal. App.) 180 P.

361.

"Conversion."-McClintock v. Parish (Okl.)
180 P. 689.

"County."-Board of Com'rs of Osborne Coun-
ty v. City of Osborne (Kan.) 180 P. 233.
"Custom."-Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. Merriam (Kan.)
180 P. 224.

"Now."-White v. Greenwood (Cal. App.) 180
P. 45.
"Occupation."-Union Health & Accident Co. v.
Anderson (Colo.) 180 P. 81.
"Original contract."-Irwin v. Silva (Cal.
App.) 180 P. 361.
"Package."-Noble v. People (Colo.) 180 P.
562.

"Party to crime."-Carrico v. State (Okl. Cr.
App.) 180 P. 870.

"Pending."-Stockard v. Hamilton (N. M.) 180
P. 294.

"Pending case."-Stockard v. Hamilton (N. M.)
180 P. 294.
"Permit."-Dorris v. McKamy (Cal. App.) 180
P. 645.

"Person."-Board of Com'rs of Osborne County
v. City of Osborne (Kan.) 180 P. 233.
"Powers in trust."-Crystal Pier Co. v. Schnei-
der (Cal. App.) 180 P. 948.
"Proximate cause."-Larson v. Calder's Park
Co. (Utah) 180 P. 599.
"Receipt."-State v. Frasier (Or.) 180 P. 520.
"Residence."-Board of Com'rs of Osborne
County v. City of Osborne (Kan.) 180 P.
233.

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am,Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

"Restraint of trade."-State v. Gurley (N.
180 P. 288.

"Restricted lands."-King v. Shults (Okl.) 180
P. 550.

"Resident owner."-Board of Com'rs of Os- cepting them expected, or ought to have ex-
borne County v. City of Osborne (Kan.) 180 pected, that they were to be paid for.-Lemley
P. 233.
v. Doak Gas Engine Co., 180 P. 671.
M.)4(2) (Wash.) Where subcontractor to do
road improvement work broke its contract with
its haulage contractor, who canceled the con-
tract, but, to prevent interruption of the work,
continued to do haulage after the cancellation,
which the subcontractor permitted without ob-
jection, a promise on its part to pay the rea-
sonable value of the services will be implied.-
Bishop v. T. Ryan Corst. Co., 180 P. 126.

"Ship."-Noble v. People (Colo.) 180 P. 562.
"State officer."-State v. Hurn (Wash.) 180 P.
400.

"Substantial injury."-Felsenthal v. Warring
(Cal. App.) 180 P. 67.

"Surplusage."-In re Wolcott's Estate (Utah)
180 P. 169.

"Thing hired."-Hamer v. Ellis (Cal. App.) 180

P. 30.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACTS.
See Courts, 95; Master and Servant,
347-405; Parties, 6, 35.

WRIT OF ERROR.

See Appeal and Error.

WRITS.

See Attachment; Certiorari; Execution; Gar-
nishment; Habeas Corpus; Injunction;
Mandamus; Process; Prohibition; Replevin.