페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

GREAT MUTINY IN INDIA-Discussions in Parliament on that subject-The

Earl of Ellenborough on the 9th of June draws the attention of the

House of Lords to the state of affairs in the East Indies-His Speech,

and Earl Granville's answer-Mr. D. Kinnaird moves resolutions in the

House of Commons with respect to Grievances in the Administration of

India-Speeches of Mr. Vernon Smith, Sir E. Perry, Lord John Russell,

Mr. Mangles and other Members-The Previous Question is moved and

carried by 119 to 18-On the 20th of June the Earl of Ellenborough

again makes a Statement in the House of Lords, and offers various sug-

gestions as to the Measures required in the alarming position of affairs in

India-Lord Granville offers Explanations on behalf of the Government—

In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli addresses a series of Questions to

the President of the Board of Control-Speech of Mr. Vernon Smith in

answer-On the arrival of further news from India, Lord Ellenborough

again presses the Government with inquiries and suggestions-Speeches

of Lord Granville and of Lord Melville-Lord Palmerston in the House of

Commons gives an account of the Measures determined on by Govern-

ment-Debate on the best mode of transport for troops to India-Prefer-

ence given by Sir Charles Wood to sailing-ships over steam-vessels-

Unfortunate result of that decision-On the 29th of July Mr. Disraeli

makes a formal Motion on the Administration of India, which he intro-

duces in a long and elaborate Speech-Speeches of Mr. Vernon Smith,

Sir E. Perry, Mr. Whiteside, Mr. Mangles, and Lord John Russell, who

moves as an Amendment an Address to the Queen, expressing the resolution

[ocr errors]

LEGAL AND SOCIAL REFORMS. THE TESTAMENTARY JURISDICTION BILL

Introduced and explained by the Lord Chancellor on the 18th of May in

the House of Lords-Passed in that House, after undergoing some altera-

tions The Attorney-General moves the Second Reading in the House of

Commons on the 26th of June-His Speech-Mr. Henley seconds the

Motion-Speeches of Mr. Collier, Mr. Rolt, Mr. Cairns and other Members

-An important Amendment is carried in Committee against the Govern-

ment The Attorney-General intimates that the Bill may be withdrawn

in consequence; but Lord Palmerston concedes the point, and the Bill is

passed-MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE BILL-It occasions a warm conflict in

Parliament, and leads to protracted debates-The Lord Chancellor moves

the Second Reading of the Bill, and states the grounds on which it is

introduced-Speeches of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Lyndhurst,

Lord Wensleydale, Lord Campbell, the Duke of Norfolk, Lord Redesdale,

the Bishops of Salisbury, Oxford and London, and other Peers-The

Second Reading is carried by 47 against 18-The Bill is fully discussed

in Committee, and undergoes several alterations-Debates on the question

of Re-marriage of Divorced persons, on the Action for Crim. Con., and

other matters-The Third Reading is warmly opposed by the Bishop of

Oxford, Earl Nelson, and Lord Redesdale-It is passed by 46 against 25—

In the Commons the opposition is still more vigorous, and the debates are

protracted to great length-Mr. Henley moves to defer the Second Read-

ing for six months-The House rejects the Motion by 217 to 139-The

Attorney-General moves the Second Reading in an able Speech, taking a

ix

comprehensive survey of the law of Marriage and Divorce-He is opposed

by Sir William Heathcote, Lord John Manners, Mr. Drummond, Mr.

Sir George Grey and

Wigram, Mr. Bowyer and Mr. Gladstone-

Mr. Walpole vindicate the Bill-It is carried by a majority of

111-It is stoutly contested, clause by clause, in Committee-Amend-

ments adverse to the Government are carried by Lord John Manners—

Much debate on the question of the grounds of Divorce, the punishment

of Adulterers, the Abolition of the Action of Crim. Con., the Re-marriage

of Divorced persons, &c.-Major Warburton moves an Amendment to

relieve Clergymen having scruples of conscience from the obligation to

re-marry such parties-Powerful argument of the Attorney-General

against this proposition-Mr. Walpole and other Members press strongly

for exempting the Clergy, and the Government reluctantly concede the

point, but with a condition as to the use of the Parish Church-This

condition is opposed by some Members with much energy, but is carried

by 73 to 33-The Third Reading is delayed by long discussions in Com-

mittee until the 21st of August-Debate on this stage of the Bill-

Remarks of Lord Palmerston on the circumstances under which the Bill

had been carried through Parliament-It is passed, but meets with

further obstruction in the Upper House-Lord Redesdale attempts to

prevent the Amendments being considered, but is obliged to give way—

The Amendments made by the Commons are agreed to, with some un-

important exceptions, but the Bill is at last saved by a very narrow

majority, and becomes law.-FRAUDULENT TRUSTEES' BILL-Occasion of

this measure being proposed-Statement of its object and proposed

enactments by the Attorney-General-It is passed through the Commons

with little opposition-Lord St. Leonards suggests some objections in the

House of Lords, and introduces a Bill with a view of qualifying its

[153

apprehended effects, but ultimately withdraws the Bill, and the measure

of the Government is passed

how far the system has been carried out-Several Members support Lord

Goderich's views, and Lord Palmerston, with some qualifications, accedes

to the resolution, which is carried-CIVIL SERVICE SUPERANNUATION

FUND-Circumstances under which this subject was brought forward-

Complaint of the Civil Servants of the Crown against the system-

Report of the Commissioners not carried out by the Government-Lord

Naas takes up the cause of the Civil Servants and brings in a Bill—It is

strongly opposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Wilson, Mr.

Gladstone and Sir Francis Baring, and supported by Mr. G. Clive, Mr.

Weguelin, Mr. Seymour Fitzgerald and Mr. Disraeli-The Second Read-

ing is carried against the Government by 171 to 111, and the Third

Reading, being again opposed, by 91 to 23-It is moved in the House of

Lords by Lord Monteagle-Remarks of Lord Belper on the Bill, and on

the conduct of the Government-The Bill is passed-THE SOUND DUES-

Arrangement with the Danish Government for redeeming them for a

fixed sum-The Chancellor of the Exchequer states the facts of the case,

and the arrangement made with Denmark, and proposes a vote of money

for the purpose-After some debate the Motion is carried nem. con.—

FINANCE The Chancellor of the Exchequer on the 13th of August moves

the continuance of the existing Tea and Sugar Duties till April, 1860-

He makes a statistical statement as to the relative consumption of the

various classes of society, and explains the requirements and ways and

means of the current year-Mr. Gladstone criticises the statement of the

Minister in some particulars, but supports his propositions-Remarks of

Mr. Disraeli-Termination of the Session- Parliament prorogued on the

28th of August by Commission - The Royal Speech - Results of the

Session
[180

« 이전계속 »