 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 페이지
...business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master...as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1876 - 762 페이지
...the fraud was committed by the agent in the transaction of the ordinary business of the principal. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...in the' course of the service, and for the master's or principal's benefit, though no express command or privity by the master or principal be proved(c).... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1876 - 996 페이지
...Can. Rail. Co. v. Conybeare, ' 22 Law J- Q- B- 69- <""'<•• See Wilson v. Kankin, LR, I 438 eral rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service, and for the master's or principal's benefit, though no express command or privity by the master or principal be proved,... | |
 | William Macpherson, Herbert Cowell, Arthur Maynard Talbot - 1878 - 268 페이지
...answerable for the act of his agent in the course of his master's business and for his master's benefit, and for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is...committed in the course of the service, and for the masters IND. APP. VOL. V.] INDEX. 241 MEASURE OF DAMAGE— continued, benefit. Though the master may... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey, John Henry Truman - 1879 - 586 페이지
...agent in the course of his master's business and for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case...as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. ... In all... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 968 페이지
...App. 394, and the doctrine above adverted to reiterated, the court saying " there is no distinction between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong;" and both cases hold that an action of deceit may be maintained against a company, whether incorporated... | |
 | Sir John Macdonell - 1883 - 792 페이지
...(q) — an action against a bank for fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of its manager — " that the master is answerable for every such wrong...of the service and for the master's benefit, though (g) Cockburn, CJ, in Patten v.Rca R. 2 Ex. 259. (1857), 2 CBNS 607. (m) Bayley, J., in A.-O. v. Sid(h}... | |
 | 1916 - 1326 페이지
...common employment under the same master was an exception to the general common-law rule that " a " master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant...course of the service and " for the master's benefit": Per Willes, J., in Barwck v. iMfulim .1 funt Stock Bank(l). Under this rule a master is liable to answer... | |
 | William Edward Hearn - 1883 - 422 페이지
...company never authorized him to do." I may add the following observations by Mr. Justice Willesf : — "The general rule is that the master is answerable...such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed 1 in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of... | |
| |
The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant, or agent, as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master't benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. 
