For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
limit liability and render it liable for delay.- U. S. v. Middleton, 3 F. (2d) 384.
Owner had burden of justifying delay.-Id. Burden of proof on part of owner, in action for delay caused by repairs, stated.-Id.
Evidence held to prove that shippers expected immediate shipment when they put cotton on board vessel.-Id.
Evidence held not to prove delay because of repairs reasonable.-Id.
Measure of damages for delay in shipment of cotton stated.-Id.
Owner held not liable to shipper's agents for delay in shipment.-Id.
—121(1) (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) Failure to repair before voyage held to deprive owner of right to limit liability and render it liable for damage by stranding.-U. S. v. Middleton, 3 F. (2d) 384. 121(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Crates of onions with contents visible charged carrier with no- tice and bound it to furnish vessel seaworthy for cargo. The Buckleigh, 3 F. (2d) 829.
131 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Measure of damages for damage to cargo difference between con- tract price and price received.-Florida Grain & Elevator Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emer- gency Fleet Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 314.
131 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Measure of damages on delivery of shipment in damaged condition stated.-The Bencleuch, 3 F. (2d) 824.
Properly allowed libelant in action for dam- ages to goods during shipment.-Id.
Allowance of damages for lemons sold subse- quent to first auction sales, in libel for dam- ages during shipment, held proper.-Id.
131 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Measure of damages stated. The Buckleigh, 3 F. (2d) 829.
132 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.China) Limitation in contract of time for bringing action for dam- ages must be specially pleaded.-Green Star S. S. Co. v. Nanyang Bros. Tobacco Co., 3 F. (2d) 369.
132(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Stipulations in bill of lading not available, unless pleaded.-The Bencleuch, 3 F.(2d) 824.
132(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Libelant held to have burden of proving good condition of hides when stowed and that bad condition on delivery was due to sea water.-The Goyaz, 3 F. (2d)
132(5) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Repair of vessel raises no inference of prior unseaworthiness or unfitness for cargo.-The Goyaz, 3 F. (2d) 553.
132(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Evidence of naviga- tion in dense fog, resulting in vessel grounding and delay causing injury to onion cargo, held to require finding of gross negligence.-The Buckleigh, 3 F. (2d) 829.
136 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Contract with barge held not to include towing tug; "affreightment contract."-Sacramento Nav. Co. v. Salz, 3 F. (2d) 759.
Harter Act held not to relieve tug from lia- bility for negligence in towing barge.-Id.
claim was barred by limitation in contract, waives such defense.-Oelbermann v. Toyo Kis- en Kabushiki Kaisha, 3 F. (2d) 5.
142 (U.S.C.C.A.China) Defense of limita- tion held waived.-Green Star S. S. Co. v. Nan- yang Bros. Tobacco Co., 3 F. (2d) 369.
Authority of representative to waive limita- tion in bills of lading.-Id.
Limitation of time for bringing suit for dam- age to shipment held unreasonably short and invalid.-Id.
143 (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) Broker, who loaded cargo on ship after expiration of certiùcate of inspection, held not liable to owner.-U. S. v. Middleton, 3 F. (2d) 384.
154 (U.S.D.C.Md.) Admiralty has juris- diction to enforce pledge of freights for mari- time purpose.-In re Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific S. S. Co., 3 F. (2d) 309.
Assignment of freights in consideration for advancements made without restriction as to use creates no maritime lien.-Id.,
154 (U.S.D.C.Md.) Assignee of freights held to have no lien.-In re Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific S. S. Co., 3 F. (2d) 311.
VIII. CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS.
166(2) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Action for assault of passenger held not barred by limitation print- ed on ticket, requiring notice of claim within 10 days.-Sutton v. Pacific S. S. Co., 3 F. (2d) 72.
X. GENERAL AVERAGE. 186 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) General average not ordered where damage to cargo by delay was caused by gross negligence in navigation.-The Buckleigh, 3 F. (2d) 829.
XI. LIMITATION OF OWNER'S LIABILITY. 208 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Owner held entitled to limitation of liability for stranding.-The North Star, 3 F. (2d) 1010.
209 (1) (U.S.C.A.Tex.) Denial) of limita- tion of shipowner's liability held not to release surety on stipulation.-Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. of Hartford v. Southern Pac. Co., 3 F.(2d) 923.
Stipulation for value given by shipowner seeking limitation of liability is substitute for vessel and freight.-Id.
Claimants may waive appraisement and treat ad interim stipulation as substitute for vessel and freight.-Id.
209(1)(U.S.D.C.Wash.) Duty of federal court to adjudicate rights and restrain litiga- tion claims in state court, where shipowner entitled to limitation of liability.-The Victoria, 3 F.(2d) 330.
209 (2) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Dismissal of pe- tition for limitation of liability refused on the ground of probability of claims in excess of value of vessel and pending freight.-The Vic- toria, 3 F. (2d) 330.
138 (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) Failure to repair be- fore voyage held to deprive owner of right to limit liability.-U. S. v. Middleton, 3 F. (2d) 384. See Libel and Slander. 138 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Liability for damage to cargo; error in navigation of vessel; "man- agement of the vessel."-The Newport, 3 F. (2d) 1017.
140 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Exceptions in bills of lading apply only to vessel on which the goods are laden.-Sacramento Nav. Co. v. Salz, 3 F. (2d) 759.
141(1) (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Limitation of lia- bility for delay in bills of lading held not to ex- tend to damage due to negligence.-Florida Grain & Elevator Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 314. Carrier held not relieved from liability for damage to cargo by provision against delay in bills of lading.-Id.
142 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Carrier, answering claim on merits, without setting up defense that
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
1. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF REMEDY IN GENERAL.
6(U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Rule of mutuality of remedy not applied, where it is understood that title is in another than vendor.-Ward v. Pear- sall, 3 F. (2d) 365.
III. GOOD FAITH AND DILIGENCE. 92 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Tender before or at trial held sufficient.-Ward v. Pearsall, 3 F. (2d) 365.
IV. PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF.
121 (1) (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Specific perform- ance of prenuptial agreement for change of
beneficiary of war risk insurance not decreed, in absence of clear and convincing proof of terms of agreement.-Layne v. U. S., 3 F. (2d) 431.
III. PROPERTY, CONTRACTS, AND LIA- BILITIES.
101 (U.S.D.C.Or.) Contractor's bond held to include payment to subcontractor of rent- al value of equipment used on public contract. -State of Oregon v. Security Const. Co., 3 F. (2d) 274.
Contractor's bond held to include cost of load- ing, transporting, unloading, and returning equipment used on public contract.-Id.
Contractor's bond held not to include cost of equipment subcontractor was bound to fur- nish, and which was not consumed in work. -Id.
Attorney's fees allowable in suit on contrac- tor's bond given under public contract.—Id.
STATUTE OF FRAUDS.
See Frauds, Statute of.
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
See Limitation of Actions.
For statutes relating to particular subjects, see the various specific topics.
1. ENACTMENT, REQUISITES, AND VA- LIDITY IN GENERAL.
64 (7) (U.S.D.C.Ga.) Invalidity of provi- sion creating presumptions held not to invali- date body of act.-Fenner v. Boykin, 3 F. (2d) 674.
VI. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. (A) General Rules of Construction. 183 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Sensible construc- tion must be adopted, if possible, though con- flicting with dry words.-Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 F. (2d) 428.
189 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Court bound by literal reading if statute is clear.-In re Linklater, 3 F. (2d) 691.
190 (App.D.C.) Scope of unambiguous stat- ute cannot be limited or extended by courts and administrative officials.-Coombe v. U. S. ex rel. Selis, 3 F. (2d) 714.
Unambiguous statute presumed to express full intention of Legislature.-Id.
219 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Departmental
Act 1909, March 4, ch. 321, 35 Stat. 1088.
struction of act entitled to great weight.-Balt- § 1(4). Amended 1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § zell v. Mitchell, 3 F. (2d) 428.
Act 1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379.
219 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Administrative construc- tion may be considered, though not conclusive.- In re Linklater, 3 F. (2d) 691.
219 (App.D.C.) Established administrative practice entitled to great weight in construing doubtful statutes or regulations.-Coombe v. U. S. ex rel. Selis, 3 F. (2d) 714.
226 (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) State statute strued by federal court in accordance with con- struction of statute of other state from which it was adopted.-Kraus v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 3 F. (2d) 277.
§ 269. Amended 1919, Feb. 26, ch. 48. 40 Stat. 1181...
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
PENAL CODE.
See Criminal Code.
1916, Sept. 7, ch. 451, § 3, 39 Stat. 729. Amended 1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 3, 41 Stat. 989...
894 1916, Sept. 7, ch. 451, § 9, 39 Stat. 730.. 808 1916, Sept. 8, ch. 463. § 2(b), 39 Stat. 757 361 1916, Sept. 8, ch. 463, §§ 14a, c, 39 Stat. 772
452 1916, Sept. 8, ch. 463, 203, 39 Stat. 778 194 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 3, 39 Stat. 875.. 234, 276, 398, 551, 836 15, 39 Stat. 885.. 17, 39 Stat. 887..
1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29,
1890, Aug. 19, ch. 802, § 1, art. 25,
1890, Aug. 19, ch. 802, § 1, art. 29, Stat. 328..
108, 276, 551, 695, 849 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 20, 39 Stat. 890. 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 33, 39 Stat. 896. 1917, Feb. 5, ch. 29, § 34, 39 Stat. 896.. 1917, March 2, ch. 145, § 41, 39 Stat. 965..
1917, June 15, ch. 30, tit. 11, § 6, 40 Stat.
1892, July 16, ch. 195, 27 Stat. 177. 1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, 27 Stat. 445..384, 759 1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, § 3, 27 Stat. 445. 1017 1893, Nov. 3. ch. 14, § 2, 28 Stat. 8.. 1897, June 7, ch. 4, § 1, art. 15, 30 Stat. 99
1898, July 1, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544. See Bankruptcy Act.
1902, July 1, ch. 1352, § 7 (27, 43), 32 Stat. 626, 628.
1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, §§ 13, 16, 32 Stat. 799, 800.
1917, Oct. 6, ch. 106, § 9, 40 Stat. 419. 714 182, 509 691 1918, May 9, ch. 69. § 1, 40 Stat. 542.. 1918, May 20, ch. 77, § 1, 40 Stat. 555... 602 1918, May 22, ch. 81, § 1e, 40 Stat. 559.. 803 1918, Oct. 16. ch. 186, 40 Stat. 1012. Amended 1920, June 5, ch. 251, 41 Stat, 1008
1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, 33 Stat. 724.. 1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, § 5, 33 Stat. 725.. 1906, March 23, ch. 1131, 34 Stat. 86.. 903 1906, June 29, ch. 3592, §§ 4, 4(2), 34 Stat. 596..
1906, June 29, ch. 3592, § 4 (7), (8). Add- ed 1918, May 9, ch. 69, § 1, 40 Stat. 542 691 1907, March 2, ch. 2534, § 5, 34 Stat. 1229 836 1907, March 4, ch. 2939, § 2. 34 Stat. 1416 138 1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35 Stat. 65......
822, 882, 988 1908, April 22, ch. 149, § 1, 35 Stat. 65... 818 1908, April 22, ch. 149, § 6, 35 Stat. 66. Amended 1910, April 5, ch. 143, § 1, 36 Stat. 291..
1909, March 4, ch. 321, 35 Stat. 1088. See Criminal Code. 1909, Aug. 5, ch. 6, § 38, 36 Stat. 112. 280 1910, April 5, ch. 143, § 1, 36 Stat. 291.. 822 1910, June 23, ch. 373, 36 Stat. 604... 309 1910, June 23, ch. 373, § 1, 36 Stat. 604. Amended 1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 30(P), 41 Stat. 1005. .1015 1910, June 25, ch. 412, § 8, 36 Stat. 840.. 232 1910, June 25, ch. 412, §§ 11, 12, 36 Stat. 842
.145, 933 1919. Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, §§ 5, 6, 41 Stat. 309, 310..
1913, Oct. 3, ch. 16, § 2, G(a, b), 38 Stat. 172
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit, 2, § 22, 41 Stat.
1913, Dec. 23, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251.
1913, Dec. 23, ch. 6, § 13(1), 38 Stat. 263. Amended 1917, June 21, ch. 32, § 4, 40 Stat. 234..
.598, 722 .334, 499, 721 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 26, 41 Stat. 315 ..145, 503, 652, 791 1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 28, 41 Stat. 316
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 29, 41 Stat.
1913, Dec. 23, ch. 6, § 16(12), 38 Stat. 265 465 1913, Dec. 23, ch. 6, § 19, 38 Stat. 270. Amended 1917, June 21, ch. 32, § 10, 40 Stat. 239.. 465 1914, Sept. 2, ch. 293, 38 Stat. 711...431, 602 1914, Sept. 26, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717..105, 961 1914, Oct. 15, ch. 323, § 2, 38 Stat. 730... 415 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, 38 Stat. 785.
117, 243, 514 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 1, 38 Stat. 785.... 243 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 1, 38 Stat. 785. Amended 1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 1006, 40 Stat. 1130. 780, 992 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 2, 38 Stat. 786..243, 992 1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 8, 38 Stat. 789.... 243 1915, March 3, ch. 90, 38 Stat. 956... 913 1915, March 4, ch. 153, § 7(4), 38 Stat. 1166
1920, Feb. 25, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437. 1920, Feb. 25, ch. 85, § 18. 41 Stat. 443.. 403 1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § 206, 41 Stat. 461 26 1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § 310, 41 Stat. 472 488 1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § 400, 41 Stat. 474.. 826 1920, March 9, ch. 95, § 1, 41 Stat. 525... 808 1920, May 29, ch. 212, 41 Stat. 630.. 353 1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 3, 41 Stat. 989.. 894
1691.. § 1706.. ..10142308a.
1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 30 (R), 41 Stat. 1005
1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 33, 41 Stat. 1007..
168, 329, 845 §§ 3239, 3240. 1453947..
1920, June 5, ch. 251, 41 Stat. 1008. 1921, March 3, ch. 126, 41 Stat. 1313.. 92 3962.. 1921, May 19, ch. 8, § 2(d), 42 Stat. 5... 398 1921, Nov. 23, ch. 134, §§ 1-5, 42 Stat. 222, 223.
1921, Nov. 23, ch. 134, § 5, 42 Stat. 223..
1921, Nov. 23, ch. 136, § 253, 42 Stat. 268 226 1921, Nov. 23, ch. 142, § 1, 42 Stat. 323.. 326 1922, June 10, ch. 212, 42 Stat. 625.. 1922, June 30, ch. 254, § 1, 42 Stat. 766.. 1922, Sept. 21, ch. 356, §§ 584, 586, 587, 593, 42 Stat. 980, 981, 982.
4628 et seq. §§ 5563-5565.. 5947... 6287g..
$$ 6287g-6287q.
1924, June 2, ch. 234, § 1018, 43 Stat. 344 190
JOINT RESOLUTIONS.
§§ 7707, 7719, 7778.
$$ 7783-7787
$$ 7837, 7848.
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
« 이전계속 » |