-15 should have disqualified himself in accordance VI. Recommendations 1. All penalties for violation of the taxicab 2. The regulations should be amended so that they 3. 4. Criminal conviction records of drivers, including - those not involving the operation of a taxicab, should be forwarded to the Public Vehicles Division. Upon conviction of a felony, there should be statutory authority for suspension of a license. The taxicab regulations should be amended so that 5. The Hackers' License and Appeals Board should be -16 the drivers can be adequately protected by An official record of this proceeding should be 6. The regulations should be amended so that a license may be suspended if the hacker fails to appear before the hearing examiner. The hearing examiner should have the power to suspend and to request that the police pick up the license from the driver. 7. Petitions for reconsideration subsequent to a 8. The process of initiating a complaint should be simplified by creating a standard form to be filled out by the passenger. These forms should be carried by all police officers. In addition, all cabs should have a sign posted on the back of the seat indicating the phone number for information regarding the reporting of complaints. 9. The information solicited on license application -17 10. There should be increased staff at the PVD office. The present number of ten is not sufficient to adequately maintain the files and carry out the responsibilities with respect to 12,000 drivers. This increase will also be needed if this office is to handle all complaints and hearings on license revocation or suspension. 11. There should also be an increase in the number of police officers specifically assigned to the monitoring of taxicabs. In conclusion, the system amounts to a maze of bureaucratic procedures, leaving no agency equipped to function adequately in the regulation of the industry. Without coordination and centralization within the system, the taxicab driver and the consuming public will not be afforded the proper safeguards. SUBJECT: Regulation of the Taxicab Industry in Jurisdictions In response to your request for information on the above subject, the attached summaries are submitted. The jurisdictions studied were: Alexandria, Virginia Arlington County, Virginia Prince Georges County, Maryland Montgomery County, Maryland State of Virginia State of Maryland Respondents from each of the above jurisdictions were asked to provide the following items of information with respect to the re gulation of the taxicab industry within those jurisdictions, as appropriate. 4. Identification of any owners' associations in the jurisdiction 5. 6. 7. 8. Identification of any drivers' association or union in Identification of those agencies of local or state government which regulate the taxicab industry in their jurisdiction, in any manner Identification of the relevant local or State code citations which govern taxicab industry regulation in the Jurisdiction Copies of those relevant State or local code sections Information was received from a variety of sources. The prin cipal taxicab companies operating in each of the jurisdictions were identified by contacting the area's chamber of commerce and/or the taxicab division of the local police department. Information about the number of cabs and the number of drivers in each jurisdiction was obtained from those governmental departments which exercised primary regulatory powers over the industry in each jurisdiction. Information about owners' and drivers' associations and/or unions was obtained by direct contact with owners and operators of the principal companies in each jurisdiction, and by reference to the International Taxicab Association headquartered in Chicago. |