Minutes and 30 Second announcements may combine to earn weekly frequency discounts. Weekly TAP Plans and All Night Show Plans may not combine to One (1) announcement (Specified rate) weekly of same length as regular sched- ule, and within time category. Maximum number of rate holder spots allowable on 26 week contract-5. Maximum number of rate holder spots allowable on 52 weeks contract--10. Democrats: Joseph Heinle BALTIMORE CITY CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES Mayoral candidates primary expenditures Clarence M. Mitchell, III. William E. Roberts.. George L. Russell.. William D. Schaefer 1 (ran on slate: Orlinsky, city council president; Hyman Pressman, comptroller) primary and general. 1 report missing for period of Dec. 2, 1971-April 2, 1972. Francis J. Valle___. Republicans: Monroe Cornish (letter sent) approximately. Samuel Shapiro (reports not on file). Ross Z. Pierrepoint, primary and general_ $605. 32 71, 956. 28 356.99 435, 026. 79 596, 759. 06 23, 738. 37 3, 067. 00 350. 00 40, 600. 87 (Primary and general) Clarence Burns, Robert L. Douglas, and Robert J. Fitz- Republican: Carl C. Burk (no primary, entered general). Third District: Democrats: 1 $7, 828. 05 920. 91 6, 653. 59 13, 480. 00 129. 55 2,204. 71 6, 294. 15 Republicans (no primaries, entered in general election): 18, 113. 59 14, 347. 13 A. Moran DeLapp-- Fourth District: Democrats: 1 Mary B. Adams__. Victorine G. Adams.. Emerson R. Julian. Republican: Earl Koger (no primary, entered general). 318. 43 4, 569. 32 13, 133. 15 40, 189. 59 1, 557. 24 5, 430. 00 16, 830. 16 5, 222. 22 2, 942. 56 0 2, 473: 28 3, 850. CO 3,850. 00 5, 945. 64 .204. 00 County Executive, Montgomery County Campaign Expenditures, 1970 Elections Friends of Greenhalgh__. Less Transfer to Democrats for Greenhalgh..... Total..... Ad Hoc Committee of Lawyers for Greenhalgh.......... Total--- $99, 284. 07 12, 690. 00 5, 744. 74 3, 685.00 121, 403. 81 127, 806. 76 48, 622. 86 2, 002. 96 46, 619.90 7,815.00 6, 065. 00 1,750.00 46. 21 176, 222.87 Note: In addition to the above, Mr. Greenhalgh received financial support from a slate called Democrats for the Seventies Funded by the Montgomery County Democratic Central Committee. Reports on file indicated that Democrats for the Seventies spent $119,912.12 in support of approximately 37 candidates including Councilmen, State Senators, House of Delegate Candidates, Sheriff, County Executive, and Members of the Democratic Central Committee. There were no breakdowns of amounts expended for each candidate. Population of Montgomery County by 1970-523,000. County Councilmen (Winners), Montgomery County Campaign Expenditures 1970 Note: All of the above elected Councilmen ran on the slate Democrats for the Seventies (See note on County Executive sheet). The above expenditures are in addition to amounts expended by the slate. MARCH 29, 1974. 1973 NEW YORK CITY ELECTIONS FOR MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF CITY COUNCIL Source of Information: Mrs. Cynthia Lefferts, Common Cause, 11 West 42d Street, New York, N. Y., (212) 736-5240. Note: Mrs. Lefferts is of opinion that in the last 10 years the person who has won the mayoral election has spent over $1,000,000. THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, Washington, D.C., February 15, 1974. To: The Honorable Walter Fauntroy, Attention: Harley Daniels. From: Sandra S. Osbourn, Analyst, Government and General Research Division • (Kenneth E. Gray, Division Chief). Subject: Expenditures by Candidates for municipal office. This memorandum is being provided to you in response to your request for data on campaign expenditures by candidates for the mayor or the city council in eight cities. There is no national collection of such data, so it was necessary to call each of the cities. Because of the variations in local reporting requirements, the data is more complete for some cities than others, and was not available at all in three of the cities. Atlanta has no reporting requirements, so no official figures are available. Baltimore and Newark require the candidates to report their expenditures to the Clerk of the Circuit Court and the City Clerk respectively, but the figures are not compiled in a readily useable manner, and are not totalled. Spokesmen for both cities said that the only way to get the data that you requested would be an on-site visit and analysis of the reports. The following table provides expenditure data for the remaining five cities: Boston, Houston, Pittsburgh, Seattle, and St. Louis. |