...377 US sentation for equal numbers of people the fundamental goal . . . ." We concluded by stating: "No right is more precious in a free country than...basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. Our Constitution leaves no room for classification of people in a way that unnecessarily abridges this...

...377 US sentation for equal numbers of people the fundamental goal . . . ." We concluded by stating: "No right is more precious in a free country than...basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. Our Constitution leaves no room for classification of people in a way that unnecessarily abridges this...

...State elections." Mr. Justice Black, speaking for the Supreme Court in Wesbcrry v. Sander»' said. "No right is more precious in a free country than...basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. Our Constitution leaves no room for classification of people in a way that unnecessarily abridges this...

...State elections.18 Mr. Justice Black, speaking for the Supreme Court in Wesberry v. Sander»," said. "No right is more precious in a free country than...basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. Our Constitution leaves no room for classification of people in a way that unnecessarily abridges this...

...from its abuse * * *" B also McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US (4 Wheat.) 316, 433-34 (1819). For s reason, "other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote undermined." Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1, 17 (1964). And see William* v. Lee Optical Inc., 348 US...

...right to suffrage in this country. As the Supreme Court recently observed in Wesberry against Sanders: "No right is more precious in a free country than...laws under which, as good citizens, we must live." In an editorial which appeared on January 5, 1967, the Washington Post drew attention to this problem...

...landmark decision on the right to vote, Wesberry v. Sanders, the Supreme Court voiced the same thought: No right is more precious in a free country than that...basic, are illusory if the right to vote Is undermined. Tf we as a nation are seriously dedicated to solvin.ir our racial problems, we will not rest with halfway...

...landmark decision on the right to vote, Western/ v. Sanders, the Supreme Court voiced the same thought : No right is more precious in a free country than that...basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. If we as a nation are seriouslv dedicated to solving our racial nroblems, we will not rest with halfway...

...protection from infringement by the States.7 Similarly we have said with reference to the right to vote: "No right is more precious in a free country than...are illusory if the right to vote is undermined." 8 No extended discussion is required to establish that the Ohio laws before us give the two old, established...

...facade. In We»berry v. Sanders (376 US 1), the Supreme Court expressed its concern about the franchise: "No right is more precious in a free country than...who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we most live. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. Our...