Employers' liability and workmen's compensation, 1-6권 |
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
accidents adjuster ambulance chasers amendment amount attorney believe Brotherhood of Locomotive CARLIN cent centum Chairman claim agents COBURN commerce clause commission committee common carriers common law compensation act compensation bill compensation law Congress constitutional contributory negligence death defenses disability Division enacted expenses fault favor Federal FLOYD Garretson gentlemen Georgia give GOMPERS GRAHAM HARDWICK hearings Hoke Smith HOWLAND indorsed injured employee injury interest interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission jury killed lawyer legislation liability act liability law litigation Locomotive Engineers matter month negligence NORRIS Ohio opposed Order of Railway paid passed payment pensation ployee present proposed proposition question railroad company railroad employees Railway Conductors received recover recovery regulation remedy represent resolution SABATH Senator REED Senator SMITH Senator SUTHERLAND statement statute STERLING Supreme Court tion to-day Trainmen trial trial by jury United wages WEBB widow workman workmen's compensation
인기 인용구
264 페이지 - ... except where the injury is occasioned by the willful intention of the injured employee to bring about the injury or death of himself or of another...
34 페이지 - A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. That is only one of the forms of municipal law, and is no more sacred than any other. Rights of property which have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due process ; but the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed at the will, or even at the whim, of the legislature, unless prevented by constitutional limitations.
28 페이지 - Everything to which the legislative power extends may be the subject of taxation, whether it be person or property, or possession, franchise or privilege, or occupation or right. Nothing but express constitutional limitation upon legislative authority can exclude anything to which the authority extends from the grasp of the taxing power, if the legislature in its discretion shall at any time select it for revenue purposes.
333 페이지 - If an employee receive an injury which of itself would only cause permanent partial disability but which, combined with a previous disability, does in fact cause permanent total disability, the employer shall provide compensation only for the disability caused by the subsequent injury...
36 페이지 - That the auditing of the accounts of a receiver of public moneys may be, in an enlarged sense, a judicial act, must be admitted. So are all those administrative duties the performance of which involves an inquiry into the existence of facts and the application to them of rules of law.
261 페이지 - True, prior to the present act, the laws of the several States were regarded as determinative of the liability of employers engaged in interstate commerce for injuries received by their employees while engaged in such commerce. But that was because Congress, although empowered to regulate that subject, had not acted thereon, and because the subject is one which falls within the police power of the States in the absence of action by Congress.
109 페이지 - It is quite conceivable that Congress, contemplating the inevitable hardship of such injuries, and hoping to diminish the economic loss to the community resulting from them, should deem it wise to impose their burdens upon those who could measurably control their causes, instead of upon those who are, in the main, helpless in that regard.
31 페이지 - And in the next, it would seem that there may be other cases beside the everyday one of taxation, in which the share of each party in the benefit of a scheme of mutual protection is sufficient compensation for the correlative burden that it is compelled to assume.
32 페이지 - It may be put forth in aid of what is sanctioned by usage, or held by the prevailing morality or strong and preponderant opinion to be greatly and immediately necessary to the public welfare.
34 페이지 - Any employer who employs five or more workmen or operates regularly in the same business, or in or about the same establishment who shall pay into the state insurance fund the premiums provided by this act, shall not be liable to respond in damages at common law or by statute...