Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 2±ÇU.S. Government Printing Office, 1912 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
1433 ÆäÀÌÁö
... rather , the Judiciary Committee of the Senate of the United States , in framing the Sherman Act had that distinction most clearly in mind , and that the language of that statute so disclosed - it was never the intention to apply ...
... rather , the Judiciary Committee of the Senate of the United States , in framing the Sherman Act had that distinction most clearly in mind , and that the language of that statute so disclosed - it was never the intention to apply ...
1439 ÆäÀÌÁö
Assuming that it is true that the antitrust law was intended to apply to railroads , as to which there was a strong dissent , apparently all the cases except the Knight case have been correctly decided . I think the decision in the ...
Assuming that it is true that the antitrust law was intended to apply to railroads , as to which there was a strong dissent , apparently all the cases except the Knight case have been correctly decided . I think the decision in the ...
1448 ÆäÀÌÁö
Do you not think that the Congress oi the United States should give to the people of this country a more definite law for the judges to apply than to say that ...
Do you not think that the Congress oi the United States should give to the people of this country a more definite law for the judges to apply than to say that ...
1463 ÆäÀÌÁö
Permit me to suggest that a pure holding company would not have to apply for a Federal license in view of the fact it is not engaged in business . Senator NEWLANDS . It is not engaged in interstate business ? Mr. KRAUTHOFF .
Permit me to suggest that a pure holding company would not have to apply for a Federal license in view of the fact it is not engaged in business . Senator NEWLANDS . It is not engaged in interstate business ? Mr. KRAUTHOFF .
1466 ÆäÀÌÁö
I believe that most of the evils of the large trusts and monopolies are due to the decision of the Supreme Court in the Knight case and to the failure to apply and to enforce the existing laws promptly , uniformly , and efficiently .
I believe that most of the evils of the large trusts and monopolies are due to the decision of the Supreme Court in the Knight case and to the failure to apply and to enforce the existing laws promptly , uniformly , and efficiently .
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action agree agreement amendment American Federation antitrust apply association attempt authority bank believe bill boycotts called capital carry cent CHAIRMAN charge clearing combination commission committee common competition concerns Congress Constitution contract corporation cost course decision defendants effect engaged establish examiner existing fact Federation of Labor further give Government holding individual industry International interstate commerce KRAUTHOFF legislation limit machinery machines manufacturers matter means monopoly MORAWETZ necessary operation opinion Organizer reports parties passed person practically present production profit prohibit pushed question reason referred regulation respect restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Sherman shoe statement statute Supreme Court thing tion trust union United violation