 Whenever the main purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some pecuniary or business purpose of his own, involving either a benefit to himself or damage to the other contracting party, his promise is not within...  The Cornell Law Quarterly - 41 페이지1925전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1901 - 864 페이지
...and object of the promisor is, not to answer for another, but to subserve some purpose of his own, his promise is not within the statute, although it...may incidentally have the effect of extinguishing the liability of another. ' 3 Pars. Cont. (5th Ed.) 24. "The statute of frauds was intended to protect... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - 1857 - 524 페이지
...purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some purpose of his own, his promise is not within the statute, although it...may incidentally have the effect of extinguishing the liability of another. If there be an oral promise to pay the debt of another, and also to do some... | |
 | 1863 - 498 페이지
...purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some purpose of his own, his promise is not within the statute, although it...may incidentally have the effect of extinguishing the liability of another. If there be an oral promise to pay the debt of another, and also to do some... | |
 | Causten Browne - 1863 - 616 페이지
...the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some pecuniary or business purpose nfhis own, involving either a benefit to himself or damage...promise is not within the statute, although it may be inform a promise to pay the debt of another, and although the performance of it may incidentally-have... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - 1866 - 810 페이지
...purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some purpose of his own, his promise is not within the statute, although it...may incidentally have the effect of extinguishing the liability of another, (t) There are several classes of cases which may perhaps be more satisfactorily... | |
 | 1892 - 554 페이지
...whenever the main purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some pecuniary or business purpose of his own, involving...of another, and although the performance of it may accidentally have the effect of extinguishing that liability.' It is possible that the language qnoted... | |
 | Causten Browne - 1870 - 616 페이지
...Whenever the main purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some pecuniary or business purpose of his own, involving...promise is not within the statute, although it may be infopm a promise to pay the debt of another, and although the performance of it may incidentally have... | |
 | Montgomery Hunt Throop - 1870 - 852 페이지
...Whenever the main purpose and object of the promisor is not to answer for another, but to subserve some pecuniary or business purpose of his own, involving...party, his promise is not within the statute, although it.may be in form a promise to pay the debt of another, and although the performance of it may incidentally... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Samuel Freeman Miller - 1875 - 756 페이지
...consideration moving between the parties. But whenever the main purpose and object of the promissor is not to answer for another, but to observe some...incidentally have the effect of extinguishing that liability. Nelson v. Boynton, 3 Met. 400; Leonard v. Vredenburg, 8 Johns. R. 39; Farley v. Cleveland, 4 Cow. 432;... | |
| |
