No. 67, Misc. CAVALLUCCI v. BURKE, WARDEN. Su preme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied. No. 73, Misc. ROBERTS V. CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Reported below: See 82 Cal. App. 2d 654, 187 P. 2d 27. No. 99, Misc. GOODMAN v. SWENSON, WARDEN. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied. below: Md., 60 A. 2d 527. No. 100, Misc. Reported TEDFORD V. HEINZE, WARDEN. Su preme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Cal. 2d 693, 192 P. 2d 3. No. 114, Misc. IN RE BARBER. Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 196 P. 2d 695. Okla. Cr., No. 116, Misc. MONAGHAN v. PENNSYLVANIA. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied. No. 123, Misc. BYRNES V. CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Reported below: See 84 Cal. App. 2d 64, 72, 190 P. 2d 286, 290. No. 129, Misc. SMITH V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Stark County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 130, Misc. DEDERER V. NEW YORK. Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 298 N. Y. 624, 81 N. E. 2d 359. · No. 132, Misc. REED V. NIERSTHEIMER, WARDEN. Circuit Court of St. Clair County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. October 18, 25, 1948. 335 U.S. No. 135, Misc. WILLIAMS v. NEW JERSEY. Supreme No. 137, Misc. MEYERS v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 140, Misc. WILDE V. CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Reported below: See 82 Cal. App. 2d 879, 187 P. 2d 825. No. 141, Misc. SKENE v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Kane County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 142, Misc. RICHARDSON v. NEW YORK. Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied. Su No. 143, Misc. O'BRIEN v. MAYO, CUSTODIAN. preme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 160 Fla. 776, 36 So. 2d 805. OCTOBER 25, 1948. Per Curiam Decisions. No. 11. DOUBLEDAY & CO., INC. v. NEW YORK. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York. Argued October 21, 1948. Decided October 25, 1948. Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Whitney North Seymour argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was George G. Gallantz. Whitman Knapp argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Frank S. Hogan. Kenneth W. Greenawalt filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. Reported below: 297 N. Y. 687, 77 N. E. 2d 6. No. 19. PENN v. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY Co. Certiorari, 333 U. S. 866, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Argued October 14, 1948. Decided October 25, 1948. Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed. Myers v. Reading Co., 331 U. S. 477. Royal W. Irwin argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Drennan J. Slater argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lowell Hastings. Reported below: 163 F.2d 995. No. 319. RING v. MARSH, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Per Curiam: The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 78 F. Supp. 914. No. 324. PIERCE ET AL. v. BOSTON; and No. 325. MCCARTHY ET AL. v. BOSTON. Appeals from the Superior Court of Massachusetts, County of Suffolk. Per Curiam: The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Frank W. Grinnell and Richard Wait for appellants. William H. Kerr for appellee. Reported below: No. 324, see 322 Mass. 709, 79 N. E. 2d 713. Miscellaneous Orders. No. 291. ARMY; and MCCAFFREY V. ROYALL, SECRETARY OF THE No. 131, Misc. MCCAFFREY V. ROYALL, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY. In No. 291, the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is denied. In No. 131, Misc., the motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Dayton M. Harrington and James D. Graham, Jr. for petitioner. The No. 9, Original. ILLINOIS v. INDIANA ET AL. Third Special Report of the Special Master is approved. The amended bill of complaint is dismissed as to (1) Bates Expanded Steel Corporation, a Delaware corporation, now known as East Chicago Expanded Steel Company, pursuant to the stipulation entered into by and among the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, City of East Chicago and Bates Expanded Steel Corporation (a Delaware corporation), now known as East Chicago Expanded Steel Company; (2) Bates Expanded Steel Corporation, an Indiana corporation, pursuant to joint motion entered into by and among the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, the City of East Chicago and Bates Expanded Steel Corporation, an Indiana corporation; (3) Rogers Galvanizing Company, pursuant to joint motion entered into by and among the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, the City of East Chicago and Rogers Galvanizing Company; (4) U. S. S. Lead Refinery, Inc., pursuant to joint motion entered into by and among the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, the City of East Chicago and U. S. S. Lead Refinery, Inc. Costs against these defendants are to be taxed in accordance with the recommendations of the Special Master. No. 9, Original. ILLINOIS v. INDIANA ET AL. The Third Interim Report of the Special Master dated September 7, 1948, is approved. The Court orders and directs the Special Master to continue the proceedings in accordance with the order of this Court dated February 17, 1947, 330 U. S. 799-800. The Court further orders that the recommendation of the Special Master as to the apportionment of costs be adopted and costs for the period from September 8, 1947, to September 7, 1948, inclusive, shall be taxed as recommended in the Third Interim Report. No. 155, Misc. IN RE ECKSTEIN. Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE REED, MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, and MR. JUSTICE BURTON are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948). MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE MURPHY, and MR. Justice RutleDGE are of the opinion that motion for leave to file should be granted and that the case should be set for argument forthwith. MR. JUSTICE JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Certiorari Granted. No. 226. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. CENTRAL-ILLINOIS SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.; No. 227. STREETER ET AL. v. CENTRAL-ILLINOIS SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.; No. 243. HOME INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. CENTRAL-ILLINOIS SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.; and No. 266. CENTRAL-ILLINOIS SECURITIES CORP. ET AL. V. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. Solicitor General Perlman and Roger S. Foster for the Securities & Exchange Commission, petitioner in No. 226 and respondent in No. 266. Lawrence R. Condon and Milton Maurer for Streeter et |