CROSS-EXAMINATION. See Evidence, 3.
DAM. See Eminent Domain.
DEATH. See Employers' Liability Act.
DECLARED WAR. See War.
DECREES. See also Antitrust Acts.
Final order and decree in United States v. Wyoming, see p. 895.
See Aliens, 1.
DEFAULT JUDGMENTS.
DEFECTS. See Procedure, 1.
DENATURALIZATION PROCEEDINGS. See Aliens, 1.
DEPORTATION. See Aliens, 2; Constitutional Law, II, 2.
DIRECT APPEAL. See Jurisdiction, II, 1.
DISCRIMINATION. See Constitutional Law, XII; Transporta-
tion.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. See Constitutional Law, VIII.
DRUGS. See Food and Drugs.
DUE PROCESS. See Constitutional Law, XI.
ELECTIONS. See also Criminal Law, 1.
Political parties-Formation-State regulation.-Illinois require-
ment that petition to form new political party be signed by 25,000
voters, including 200 from each of at least 50 of 102 counties, valid.
MacDougall v. Green, 281.
EMERGENCY PRICE CONTROL ACT. See Constitutional Law,
VII; Jurisdiction, II, 1.
EMINENT DOMAIN. See also Jurisdiction, I, 4.
Taking of lands-Measure of compensation-Federal Power Act.-
In state court proceeding under state law, Federal Power Act did
not preclude inclusion of value of land for power project, though
condemnor had federal license and condemnee did not. Grand River
Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro, 359.
EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE. See Constitutional Law, II, 1;
Employers' Liability Act; Labor.
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT.
1. Liability of carrier-Negligence-Defective appliance.-Liabil-
ity of railroad for death of employee whose track car crashed into
train which stopped unexpectedly due to defective brakes. Coray v.
Southern Pacific Co., 520.
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT-Continued.
2. Liability of carrier-Death of employee-Negligence.-Evidence
as insufficient to sustain recovery. Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania R.
Co., 329.
ENEMY ALIENS. See Aliens; Constitutional Law, II, 2; XI, 3;
Jurisdiction, I, 1; War.
EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS. See Constitutional Law, XII.
ESTATE TAX. See Taxation.
EVIDENCE. See also Constitutional Law, VI; VII; Employers'
Liability Act, 2.
1. Admissibility-Confessions-Federal courts.-Confession made
by arrested person after 30 hours without having been taken before
commissioner, inadmissible. Upshaw v. United States, 410.
2. Admissibility-Evidence unlawfully obtained-Codefendant.-
Admission of evidence unlawfully obtained as to one codefendant
was prejudicial as to other. McDonald v. United States, 451.
3. Admissibility - Hearsay - Character - Reputation Prior ar-
rest.-Permitting prosecutor in bribery case to ask character witness
on cross-examination whether he had heard that defendant had been
arrested 27 years previously for receiving stolen property, not re-
versible error. Michelson v. United States, 469.
EXPENDITURE. See Criminal Law, 1.
FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT. See Constitutional Law, II, 1;
Jurisdiction, I, 3; Labor, 1.
FAIR TRIAL. See Constitutional Law, VIII; XI.
FEDERAL ESTATE TAX. See Taxation.
FEDERAL POWER ACT. See Eminent Domain; Jurisdiction,
I, 4.
FEDERAL QUESTION. See Jurisdiction, I, 4; II, 4.
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. See Procedure, 3.
FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. See Proce-
dure, 4.
FINANCE COMPANIES. See Antitrust Acts.
FINDINGS OF FACT. See Jurisdiction, II, 3.
FIRST AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, IV; V.
FOOD AND DRUGS. See also Criminal Law, 2.
1. Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act-Offenses-Misbranding-Intro-
duction in interstate commerce.-Drugs "misbranded" though litera-
ture (labels) shipped separately; labels as "accompanying" article.
Kordel v. United States, 345.
2. Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act.-Misbranded devices-Condemna-
tion.-Machines condemnable as "misbranded when introduced" into
interstate commerce though leaflets (labels) were sent at different
time. United States v. Urbuteit, 355.
FORMAL DEFECTS. See Procedure, 1.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. See Constitutional Law, IV.
FREIGHT RATES. See Transportation.
GAS. See Constitutional Law, IX.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. See Constitutional Law, VIII.
GREAT BRITAIN. See Constitutional Law, II, 1; Labor, 1.
HABEAS CORPUS.
Power to issue writ-Federal district court-Presence of prisoner.—
Federal district court without jurisdiction if prisoner not within
district when petition is filed; waiver invalid. Ahrens v. Clark, 188.
HARRISON NARCOTICS ACT. See Constitutional Law, VIII.
HEARSAY. See Evidence, 3.
ILLINOIS. See Constitutional Law, I; Transportation; Trusts.
IMMUNITY. See Constitutional Law, VII; XIII; Witnesses.
IMPARTIAL JURY. See Constitutional Law, VIII.
INDICTMENT. See Criminal Law, 2; Jurisdiction, II, 2.
IN FORMA PAUPERIS. See Procedure, 3.
INFORMATION. See Criminal Law, 2.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Constitutional Law, IX; Em-
ployers' Liability Act; Food and Drugs; Transportation.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. See Bankruptcy,
1-2; Transportation.
INTOXICATING LIQUORS. See Constitutional Law, XII, 2–3.
JUDGMENTS. See Aliens; Decrees; Antitrust Acts.
JUDICIAL POWER. See Constitutional Law, III; Jurisdiction.
JURISDICTION. See also Constitutional Law.
I. In General.
II. Supreme Court.
III. District Courts.
References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction.—Admin-
istrative Law, I, 1; Admiralty, III, 1; Alien Enemy Act, I, 1; Aliens,
I, 1; Appeal, II, 1-4; Bermuda, I, 3; Case, I, 2; Compensation, I, 4;
Concurrent Findings, II, 3; Condemnation, I, 4; Constitutional Law,
II, 2, 4; Contempt, II, 1; Controversy, I, 2; Courts of Appeals,
I, 6; Criminal Appeals Act, II, 1, 2; Criminal Law, II, 1; III, 2;
Direct Appeal, II, 1; Emergency Price Control Act, II, 1; Eminent
Domain, I, 4; Fair Labor Standards Act, I, 3; Federal Power Act,
I, 4; Federal Question, I, 4; II, 4; Findings, II, 3; Habeas Corpus,
III, 2; Indictment, II, 2; Labor, I, 3; Local Law, I, 5-6; Moot
Question, I, 1; Parties, II, 1; Political Question, I, 3; Price Control
Act, II, 1; Record, II, 4; Suits in Admiralty Act, III, 1; Waiver,
III, 2.
1. Federal courts-Review of administrative action-When pre-
cluded.-Order under Alien Enemy Act for removal of alien enemy
from United States, not judicially reviewable. Ludecke v. Watkins,
160.
2. Case or controversy-Moot question.-Question presented as not
moot. Ford Motor Co. v. United States, 303.
3. Political questions.-Whether Fair Labor Standards Act appli-
cable to Bermuda military base was not political question beyond
competence of courts to decide. Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell,
377.
4. Federal question.-Effect of Federal Power Act on measure of
compensation in condemnation proceeding in state court was federal
question. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro, 359.
5. Local law.-State court's construction of state law binding here.
Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro, 359.
6. Id.--Effect of decision of state law by United States Court of
Appeals for circuit embracing state. Estate of Spiegel v. Commis-
sioner, 701.
1. Direct appeal-Criminal Appeals Act.-United States as party
entitled to appeal from judgment barring prosecution for contempt
of injunction under Price Control Act. United States v. Hoffman, 77.
2. Scope of review-Criminal Appeals Act.-Court not required
to pass upon constitutionality of Act when dismissed indictment did
not state offense under it. United States v. C. I. O., 106.
3. Scope of review-Findings of fact.-Conclusiveness of concurrent
findings of fact by district and appellate courts. Comstock v. Group
of Investors, 211:
4. Review of state court-Federal question-Presentation.-Record
adequately raised federal constitutional question of right to counsel.
Uveges v. Pennsylvania, 437.
1. Suit against United States--Suits in Admiralty Act.-Libel in
personam which was not brought in specified district, but which
United States answered on merits, improperly dismissed. Hoiness
v. United States, 297.
2. Habeas corpus-Power to issue writ-Presence of prisoner.-
District court without habeas corpus jurisdiction if prisoner not
within district when petition is filed; waiver invalid.
JURY TRIAL. See Constitutional Law, VIII.
JUST COMPENSATION. See Eminent Domain.
LABELS. See Food and Drugs.
LABOR. See also Criminal Law, 1; Employers' Liability Act.
1. Fair Labor Standards Act-Coverage-Possession of United
States.-Area in Bermuda leased from Britain for military base was
"possession" of United States within coverage of Fair Labor Stand-
ards Act. Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell, 377.
2. State regulation-Closed shop-Contracts.-Validity of state
laws banning discrimination in employment opportunities because
of membership or non-membership in labor organization; discrimi-
natory contracts. Lincoln Union v. Northwestern Co., 525; A. F.
of L. v. American Sash Co., 538.
|