 To this end, regard should be had, not so much to the nature and character of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - 691 페이지저자: Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell, Samuel Ames - 1846 - 872 페이지
...where the corporations have no private estate or interest in the grant. If the powers conferred be granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body, in its public and numicipal character; but if for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 페이지
...confusion. In separating them, regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...corporate body in its public, political or municipal BOARD or PABK Con M i»»i ONHRS r. COHHOIC COUNCIL or DITROIT. character. But if the grant was for... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1855 - 710 페이지
...character of the various powers conferred, as the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes, exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public or municipal character. But if for purposes of private advantage, though the public may derive a common... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 684 페이지
...powers, public and private, regard must be had to the, object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively they belong to the corporate body in its public, polftical or municipal character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument,... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1862 - 486 페이지
...of the private property of the city — as much so as the lands and houses within it. If powers are granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 페이지
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 페이지
...conferred, as to the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If FISHER v. NEW BERN. granted for public purposes, exclusively, they belong...political or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purpose of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
 | 1892 - 554 페이지
...of the various powers conferred as to the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public, political character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 914 페이지
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 904 페이지
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...and emolument, though the public may derive a common beneftt therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on... | |
| |
