Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Superior Court of the City of New York, 5±ÇW.C. Little & Company, 1851 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
98°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
30 ÆäÀÌÁö
... decided that the preliminary proofs were sufficient , to which decision the defend- ants ' counsel excepted . ( It appeared that the suit was commenced in October , 1847. ) The plaintiffs proved by a sister of the master of the vessel ...
... decided that the preliminary proofs were sufficient , to which decision the defend- ants ' counsel excepted . ( It appeared that the suit was commenced in October , 1847. ) The plaintiffs proved by a sister of the master of the vessel ...
32 ÆäÀÌÁö
... decided that it was inadmissible , to which decision the defendants ' counsel excepted . The defendants called as a witness Captain Simmons , of the ship Magnolia of New Bedford , which in November , 1846 , and before and after that ...
... decided that it was inadmissible , to which decision the defendants ' counsel excepted . The defendants called as a witness Captain Simmons , of the ship Magnolia of New Bedford , which in November , 1846 , and before and after that ...
33 ÆäÀÌÁö
... decided to exclude it , to which decision defendants ' counsel excepted . Defendants ' counsel further offered to prove , that previous to the date of the policy in suit , it had been the general and uniform usage at New Bedford of ...
... decided to exclude it , to which decision defendants ' counsel excepted . Defendants ' counsel further offered to prove , that previous to the date of the policy in suit , it had been the general and uniform usage at New Bedford of ...
34 ÆäÀÌÁö
... decided by the court to be inadmissible , to which decision defendants ' counsel excepted . The testimony having been closed , the counsel for the defendants requested the court to charge the jury , that the provision in the policy ...
... decided by the court to be inadmissible , to which decision defendants ' counsel excepted . The testimony having been closed , the counsel for the defendants requested the court to charge the jury , that the provision in the policy ...
52 ÆäÀÌÁö
... decided that the private sale by Sus to Miller & Parsons , constituted no defence to the action , if the auction sale were in other respects a fair sale of the lemons ; and he submitted to the jury the following questions : -First , Was ...
... decided that the private sale by Sus to Miller & Parsons , constituted no defence to the action , if the auction sale were in other respects a fair sale of the lemons ; and he submitted to the jury the following questions : -First , Was ...
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action affidavit alleged amount appeared applied assignment attorney authority bank bill bill of lading bottomry CALIFORN cause chancery charge charter party claim codicil commenced complaint contract corporation costs counsel court of chancery court of equity creditors damages debt decision declaration decree deed defendant defendant's delivered delivery demurrer devise dollars DUER entitled error evidence execution fact filed flour fraud fraudulent given ground held Horace Gray injunction insolvent intent interest James Roosevelt Bayley judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice land liable lien ment Morris Canal mortgage motion OAKLEY objection owner paid party payment piers plaintiff possession premises proceedings proof proved provisions purchase question received recover referred rendered replevin residuary estate revised statutes rule SANDFORD suit supreme court testator tion transfer trial trust Union Theological Seminary valid verdict vessel void Wend whaling York