THE CANADIAN LAW TIMES Edited by E. DOUGLAS ARMOUR, Of Osgoode Hall, Barrister-at-Law. VOL. V. TORONTO: CARSWELL & CO., PUBLISHERS. 1885 Entered according to Act of Parliament of Canada, in the year one thousand eight hundred and eighty-six, by CARSWELL & Co., in the office of the Minister of Agriculture. PRINTED BY MOORE & Co., LAW PRINTERS, TORONTO. 24 1969 TABLE OF CASES. A Bickford v. Chatham, 594 Blagden v. Bennett, 367 Abbinett v. North Western Mutual Bogart v. Township of Seymour, 599 Bois, ex parte, 525 Borthwick v. Corporation of Ottawa, re, 178 Alexander v. School Trustees of Boultbee v. Burk, 134 Ins. Co., 480 Ackman v. Monkman, 478 Adair v. Wade, 134 Adamson v. Yeager, 30 Gloucester, 591 Andrews, in re, 516 Armstrong v. Farr, 279 treal, 503 Boughton v. Citizens' Ins. Co., 522 Bradley v. Bradley, 190 Brassert v. McGiven, 372 Brice v. Munro, 130, 182 Attorney-General v. Bank of Mon- Bridges v. Real Estate Loan Co., B Baker v. Jackson, 237, 373 219 Brigham v. Warner, 235 Brookes v. Conley, 82 Brown v. Nelson, 92, 93 Bruce v. McLay, 29 Brussels v. Ronald, 278 Bryce v. Salt, 523 Buckley v. Russell, 528 Bank of B. N. A. v. Western Assur- Budworth v. Bell, 186 Beasley v. Corporation of Hamllton, Cameron v. Bickford, 176 v. North-West Trans. Co., Canada Life Assurance Co. v. Nut tal, 381 Canada Publishing Co. v. Gage, 578 Canadian Land and Emigration Co. v. Dysart, 143, 221, 380 Bell Telephone Co. v. Minister of Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Agriculture, re, 38, 371 Conmee, 584 Carey v. City of Toronto, 281 Doyle v. Bell, 30 Carson v. Veitch, 463 Carter v. Barker, 287 Duncan v. Tees, 381 Dunn v. Allen, 384 Chapman v. McLaughlin, in re, 227 | Dyment v. Thompson, 369 City of Montreal v. Hall, 275 Clark, in re, v. Corporation of Clark v. Hamilton Provident Co., 83 Clark v. Union Fire Ins. Co., 96 Claxton v. Shibley, 555 Cleator, in re, 554 Clendenan v. Grant, 140 Clendenning v. Turner, 136 Close v. Exchange Bank, 556 Conmee v. C. P. R. Co., 584 Conway v. C. P. R. Co., 129 Cook v. Edwards, 318 v. Lemieux, 235 Cooke v. Driffil, in re, 232 Copeland v. Corporation of Blenheim, 132, 380 Core v. Ontario Loan Co., 221 Corporation of Oakville and Chisholm, in re, 548 Corporation of Stratford v. Wilson, 38 Cosgrave v. Starrs, 281 Cottingham v. Cottingham, 280, 286 Coulter, in re, 230 Crowter, in re; Crowter v. Henman, 518 Culverwell v. Birney, 188 D Darling v. Midland Railway, 324 Davies B. and M. Co. v. Smith, 238 De Forrest v. Holland, 44 Glass v. Cameron, 375 Gliddon, ex parte; in re The Maritime Demorest v. Midland Railway, 240 Goring v. Cameron, 92 v. London Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 186, 373 Graham v. Williams, 87, 318 v. Lang, 593 Grahame v. Bolton, 378 Keays v. Emard, 598 Kenny v. McKenzie, 509 Kinnear v Blue, 42 Hately v. Merchants' Despatch Co., Kinver v. Phoenix Lodge, 78 Harnden, in re, 329 Hay v. Paterson, 468 314, 506 Kitchen v. Dolan, 319 L Labatt v. Campbell, 40 La Compagnie Gibraltar v. Hughes, 73 Lake Superior Native Copper Co., in re, 331 Lake Superior Copper Co., in re; L. Langtry v. Dumoulin, 84, 218 Lean v. Huston, 228 Lett v. St. Lawrence & Ottawa Ry. Co., 30 Lewin,J. D., ex parte, 416 Lewin v. Wilson, 75 Lewis, in re; Jackson v. Scott, 467 Lightbound v. Bower, 469 Ings v. Bank of Prince Edward Liquor License Act, 1883, in re, 66 Island, 414 Irwin v. Sperry, 559 Ivey v. Knox, 315 J Jackson v. Staley, 371 Livingstone v. Trout, 93 Locomotive Engine Co. v. Copeland, Lynch v. Wood, 76 Lyttle v. Brodie, 587 Jamieson v. Prince Albert Coloniza- Lyon v. McKay, 183 tion Co., 522 |