ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

On March 1, 1913, each party shall deposit, under the same conditions as above, its counter-memorial, with the papers appertaining thereto, and its final conclusions.

The tribunal shall meet at The Hague, in the second fortnight of March, upon the convocation of its president.

ARTICLE 4

For all points not covered by the present compromis, the stipulations of the compromis of March 6, 1912,1 and of the agreement of April 4, 1912,2 shall be applicable to the present litigation.

Done at Paris, November 8, 1912.

(Signed) L. RENAULT (Signed) G. FUSINATO

Agreement between France and Italy settling definitively the "Tavignano," "Camouna" and "Gaulois" controversy.-Signed at The Hague, May 2, 1913.3

As the two affairs of the Carthage and the Manouba are about to be settled by arbitral award, the Government of the French Republic and the Royal Italian Government consider that a direct settlement of the affair concerning the Tavignano and the two Tunisian mahones is particularly desirable because of the similar nature of the dispute. The two Governments are especially desirous of taking this course which gives them another opportunity to show the spirit of cordial friendship which mutually animates them. To this end they have agreed that it will be equitable to indemnify the individuals for the losses sustained by them. The Royal Italian Government having declared itself willing to pay the sum of five thousand francs for this purpose, the Government of the French Republic has declared that it will accept the same and consider this affair thus definitively settled.

The undersigned have testified to the agreement of their Governments by the present act, which shall have the force of law. Signed: L. RENAULT

1Ante, pp. 336, 351.

2 Ante, p. 340.

G. FUSINATO

3Translation. For the original French text, see Appendix, p. 623.

TABULAR STATEMENT

OF

AWARDS AND REPORTS

OF THE

HAGUE TRIBUNALS

AND

COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY

[blocks in formation]

CASES DECIDED BY

Parties

Mexico vs. United States

Germany, Great Britain, Italy vs. Venezuela et al.
France, Germany, Great Britain vs. Japan
France vs. Great Britain

France vs. Germany

Norway vs. Sweden

Great Britain vs. United States

United States vs. Venezuela
France vs. Great Britain

Italy vs. Peru
Russia vs. Turkey

France vs. Italy

Netherlands vs. Portugal

CASES REFERRED TO

[blocks in formation]

1The name of the president of the tribunal appears first in this list. Not a member of the Permain charge of the Carthage and Manouba cases, but they were finally settled out of court by a special agree

424

[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

Arbitrators1

Matzen, Sir Edward Fry, Martens, Asser, de
Savornin Lohman

Mourawieff, Lammasch, Martens

Gram, Renault, Motono

Lammasch, Melville W. Fuller, de Savornin Loh

man

Hammarskjöld, Sir Edward Fry, Fusinato,
Kriege, Renault

Loeff, Beichmann,2 Hammarskjöld

Lammasch, de Savornin Lohman, George Gray,
Sir Charles Fitzpatrick, Drago

Lammasch, Beernaert, de Quesada

Beernaert, Renault, Lord Desart, Gram, de
Savornin Lohman

Renault, Fusinato, Calderón

Lardy, Baron de Taube, Mandelstam,2 Herante
Abro Bey,2 Ahmed Réchid Bey2
Hammarskjöld, Renault, Fusinato, Kriege, Baron
de Taube

[blocks in formation]

Lardy

HAGUE COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY

Date of Agreement

Date of Report

Commissioners

[blocks in formation]

Admirals, Spaum, Doubassoff, Beaumont, Fournier, Davis

Captains James Segrave, Sombron, Zerbi

nent Court. These cases were also referred, by compromis of November 8, 1912, to the Hague tribunal ment of May 2, 1913.

425

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »