A Selection of Cases on Constitutional LawLittle, Brown, 1900 - 1080페이지 |
도서 본문에서
67개의 결과 중 1 - 5개
viii 페이지
... Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction . 635 d . Controversies to which the United States or a State is a Party 673 1. Suits by or against the United States · 673 2. Controversies between States . 686 • 3. Controversies between a State and ...
... Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction . 635 d . Controversies to which the United States or a State is a Party 673 1. Suits by or against the United States · 673 2. Controversies between States . 686 • 3. Controversies between a State and ...
xxiv 페이지
... admiralty and maritime jurisdiction ; to controversies to which the United States shall be a party ; to controversies between two or more states , between a state and citi- zens of another state , between citizens of different states ...
... admiralty and maritime jurisdiction ; to controversies to which the United States shall be a party ; to controversies between two or more states , between a state and citi- zens of another state , between citizens of different states ...
82 페이지
... admiralty and maritime jurisdiction , to which , from the nature of the questions involved in them , or of the principles of decision to be applied to them , or from the character or citizenship of the parties to them , or to be ...
... admiralty and maritime jurisdiction , to which , from the nature of the questions involved in them , or of the principles of decision to be applied to them , or from the character or citizenship of the parties to them , or to be ...
258 페이지
... admiralty jurisdiction under the law of 1845 , but of the power of Congress over the commerce of the United States . The contracts sued on do not relate to the purely internal commerce of a State , but impliedly , at least , connect ...
... admiralty jurisdiction under the law of 1845 , but of the power of Congress over the commerce of the United States . The contracts sued on do not relate to the purely internal commerce of a State , but impliedly , at least , connect ...
259 페이지
... admiralty and maritime jurisdiction . Affirmed.1 1 In the case of LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY V. PENNSYLVANIA , 145 U. S. 192 ( 1892 ) , the question was as to the validity of a State tax on receipts from transpor- tation of freight ...
... admiralty and maritime jurisdiction . Affirmed.1 1 In the case of LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY V. PENNSYLVANIA , 145 U. S. 192 ( 1892 ) , the question was as to the validity of a State tax on receipts from transpor- tation of freight ...
목차
1 | |
40 | |
79 | |
102 | |
113 | |
122 | |
136 | |
189 | |
205 | |
235 | |
273 | |
303 | |
423 | |
436 | |
442 | |
459 | |
471 | |
478 | |
501 | |
515 | |
522 | |
541 | |
548 | |
557 | |
590 | |
815 | |
822 | |
838 | |
844 | |
855 | |
867 | |
878 | |
885 | |
891 | |
956 | |
964 | |
979 | |
998 | |
1030 | |
1050 | |
1071 | |
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
act of Congress action admiralty adopted affirmed amendment appeal applied arising authority bank bill bonds Chief Justice Circuit Court citizens claim clause common law conferred Constitution construction contract corporation debts decision declared defendant delivered the opinion District duty effect enacted enforce established exclusive executive exercise existence extend fact Federal courts foreign Fourteenth Amendment grant habeas corpus held imposed indictment interest interstate commerce issued judges judgment judicial power jury land lative legal tender legislation legislature license limits Louisiana Maryland matter means ment Missouri navigable necessary offence officers oleomargarine original jurisdiction parties Pennsylvania persons plaintiff in error President principle privileges proceedings prohibition protection punishment purpose question railroad company regulate commerce rendered respect river rule secured Stat statute suit Supreme Court taxation territory thereof tion treaty tribunals Union United validity vessels vested Wheat writ of error
인기 인용구
795 페이지 - that the laws of the several states, except where the Constitution, treaties or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States in cases where they apply.
754 페이지 - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
845 페이지 - And the said records and judicial proceedings, so authenticated, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the State from which they are taken.
706 페이지 - That the Circuit Courts of the United States shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, of all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum or value of two thousand dollars, and arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States...
837 페이지 - It is hereby ordained and declared by the authority aforesaid, that the following articles shall be considered as articles of compact between the original states and the people and states in the said territory, and forever remain unalterable, unless by common consent...
810 페이지 - If an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void, does it, notwithstanding its invalidity, bind the courts, and oblige them to give it effect ? Or, in other words, though it be not law, does it constitute a rule as operative, as if it was a law ? This would be to overthrow in fact, what was established in theory ; and would seem, at first view, an absurdity too gross to be insisted on.
810 페이지 - It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.
4 페이지 - The government of the United States, then, though limited in its powers, is supreme; and its laws, when made in pursuance of the Constitution, form the supreme law of the land, ' ' anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
166 페이지 - The result is a conviction that the states have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by Congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the general government.
447 페이지 - We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. But we think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion, with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution, which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it, in the manner most beneficial to the people.