Bales vs. State.... 220 Collins advs. State... 587 Barnard et al. vs. Lafayette County. 409 County Court of Crittenden Co. advs. Beavers advs. Overton.. State.. 360 623 Berry vs. Diamond ex.. 262 Craig advs. Trapnall adx. 243 Bertrand vs. Viser... 487 Biscoe et al. advs. Alderman and Crosby et al. advs. McDaniel ad.... 533 99 Town Council, etc... 417 D. Biscoe vs. State. 559 Bob, alias Robert Crow vs. Powers.. 424 Daniel et al. vs. Lefevre.. 201 695 Sadler exr. advs. Rheubottom et al. 496 Stewart advs. Kirkpatrick... Scantland ad. advs. Marlatt. Sessions vs. Peay, Recr.. same vs. same Shell et al. vs. Martin. Shields vs. Trammell et al. same advs. Bales same vs. County Court Crittenden County same vs. Mills 443 Stillwell advs. Fagan, Fin'l Rec'r.. 282 267 Stone advs. Hartman et al... 270 Sturdy & wife et al. vs. Jacoway. 139 Sullivan ad. vs. Deadman. 639 499 484 205 96 473 194 148 66 51 39 243 677 690 360 V. 476 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, AT THE JULY TERM, A D. 1857. BUTLER VS. REARDON ET AL. It was not the duty of the Swamp Land Commissioners to audit and certifiy accounts for printing the advertisements for the sale of the swamp lands, required by the act of January 12, 1853, to be made by the Land Agents. Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court. Hon. WILLIAM H. FEILD, Circuit Judge. PIKE & CUMMINS and GALLAGHER, for the appellant. The question as to the power and duty of the Board of Swamp Land Commissioners to audit and adjust the account presented and to give a certificate of its justice, before by law it could be paid at all, seems to us a very plain one. |