require a fee of fifty cents from every appli cant registered. 28. [Same Commission AppointmentDuties.]-The court will, on or before the opening of the September term in each year, appoint a commission composed of five (5) persons, learned in law, to conduct examinations for the ensuing year. The commission so appointed shall, prior to the examinations, examine the proofs of qualifications filed in accordance with the foregoing rules, and may make such further investigation as to the qualifications of any applicant as it shall deem expedient. On the day appointed it shall commence the examination of applicants. The method of conducting the examinations shall be left to the discretion of the commission, it being expected that the commission will, in the conduct of such examinations, and in the investigation of the qualifications of applicants, take care that no person shall be recommended for admission who has not in all particulars shown himself to be well qualified. Oral examinations shall be reported by the stenographer of this court. 29. [Same-Report.]-As soon as practicable after the conclusion of the examination, the commission shall make a written report to the court of its conclusions, and all persons who shall be recommended for admission by a majority of the commissioners shall thereupon be admitted to practice, on taking the oath prescribed by law. 30. [Same-Rejection of applicant-Further certificate.]—If an applicant shall be rejected, he shall not again be admitted to an examination for one year from the time of such rejection, and until he shall file a certificate that he has studied law for one year since his rejection. 34. [Assignments of error on appeal.]-The party appealing must also file with his transcript and præcipe, or within thirty days after the adoption of this rule, a typewritten or printed brief setting forth only the errors complained of, and until further order must serve and file printed briefs of his points and citations in support thereof as provided in rules 9 and 10. 35. [Cross-appeal.]-Co-parties of appellants may join in the appeal or take cross-appeal, or other appellees may take cross-appeal by filing with the clerk of this court a typewritten or printed brief which shall contain only the errors complained of, the court from which the appeal is taken, the date of the judgment appealed from, and the names of the parties plaintiff and defendant respectively. Such brief must be filed within thirty days after service of notice of appeal upon them, or within the same time after having waived such service or within the time limited by statute for appealing. If such cross-appeal is taken more than thirty days after the service of the notice of appeal upon the party taking such cross-appeal, the præcipe required by rule 33 must be filed with such cross-appeal and notice be issued and served thereon, and such crossappeal shall not delay the hearing of the first appeal. 36. [Notice of appeal.]-Upon the filing of said transcript and præcipe, where no notice of appeal has been filed in the district court within ninety days after the rendition of the judgment or decree, the clerk shall issue a notice of appeal which shall designate as appellants the names of the parties joining in the appeal, and as appellees the names of all other parties. It shall also designate the court from which the appeal is taken and the date of judgment appealed from and sepa 31. [Same-Graduates of the College of Law.]-Graduates of the College of Law of the University of Nebraska shall make appli-rately state the names of the parties plaintiff cation and present proofs of qualifications in the same manner as other applicants. If found otherwise qualified by the commission, they shall be admitted without examination. 32. [Questions not involved in litigation.]-. Only questions involved in matters of actual litigation before the court will be entertained or judicially determined, and no opinion will be filed in answer to any merely hypothetical question. 33. [Præcipe.] The party or parties appealing shall file with the transcript, or within thirty days after the adoption of this rule, a præcipe which shall state the court from which the appeal is taken, the date of the judgment appealed from, the names of all parties and their relations to the case as they appeared in the court below. The præcipe shall also specify the party or parties appealing and designate all others made parties to the appeal as appellees. and the parties defendant respectively in the court below. The notice shall be returnable within thirty days after it is issued, and shall be served upon the appellees named therein or their attorney or attorneys of record in the court below. The service shall be made by the sheriff of the county in which the parties or attorneys may be found and as provided by law for the service of summons in civil actions in the district court. The issuing and service of the notice may be waived by writing, signed by the parties to be served, but such waiver will not dispense with the filing of the præcipe. 37. [Attorneys of record below attorneys in this court.]-The attorneys of record and guardians ad litem of the respective parties in the court below shall be deemed the attorneys and guardians of the same parties respectively in this court, until others are retained or appointed and notice thereof served on the adverse party. Denny, Beans v. (Iowa). Page 1 Dennie, Town of Partridge v. (Minn.).. 234 Farwell v. Minneapolis (Minn.).. Page 422 .1091 Denny, State v. (N. D.).. 869 Faulhaber, St. Paul Harvester Co. V. (Neb.) 702 Des Moines, Coggeshall v. (Iowa). 309 Faust, Ruthruff v. (Mich.). 902 Despatch Laundry Co. v. Employer's Lia- Fehd v. Oskaloosa (Iowa). 989 Fehlau, Chandler Lumber Co. v. (Wis.)..1057 52 (Minn.) Detroit Lumber Co. v. The Petrel (Mich.). Dietlein, Northwest Thresher Co. V. Dittmer v. Mierandorf (Iowa). Dobbs v. Atlas Elevator Co. (S. D.). Dodge County, Western Union Tel. Co. v. (Neb.) Doll, Jacobson v. (Neb.). Donahoe, Tossini v. (S. D.) Doremus, Garner v. (Mich.). 80 Fenton v. Iowa State Traveling Men's 251 Ferrell, Goulding v. (Minn.). 1046 .... 645 Feuerstein v. Richter (Mich.). 740 Fillingham v. Michigan United Rys. Co. (Mich.) 635 231 First State Bank of Red Lake Falls, 490 128 Fisher v. Radford (Mich.). 12 Fisher, In re (Minn.). Fisher, State v. (Neb.).. 846 66 882 Ohio German Fire Ins. Co. 468 Fitzer v. St. Paul City R. Co. (Minn.). 434 441 785 .1125 Flickinger v. Cornwell (S. D.). 743 Flormann, Tilton v. (S. D.). .1039 377 Douglas' Estate, In re (Iowa). 982 (Wis.) 944 Draper v. Brown (Mich.).. 213 Drayton, State v. (Neb.). 768 Forest City Steel & Iron Co. v. Detroit & 645 Driskill v. Rebbe (S. D.). 135 Dummer v. United States Gypsum Co. (Mich.) 317 Foster v. Watson (Mich.). 197 Fox's Estate, In re (Mich.). 558 East Grand Forks, Lodgord v. (Minn.).. 341 Eckerhardt, People's Light Co. v. (Iowa) 970 Fraternal Reserve Ass'n, Johnson V. 68 (Wis.) .1019 625 Frazer, State v. (S. D.).. 366 830 Ecorse Tp. v. Jackson, A. A. & D. Ry. (Mich.) Freeborn County v. Helle (Minn.). 153 158 89 Fronk, J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. (Minn.) 229 666 Frost Co., Elaterite Paint & Mfg. Co. v. (Minn.) 388 Egan, In re (S. D.). 874 Fullerton Lumber Co. v. Snouffer (Iowa).. 50 523 344 Eikelberg, Wapello County v. (Iowa). 978 Elaterite Paint & Mfg. Co. v. S. E. Frost Co. (Minn.)... 388 Gandy v. Bissell's Estate (Neb.) 349 Electric Supply Co. v. Purslow (Iowa).. Elliott, Erickson v. (N. D.)... 28 Gannon v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 361 (Iowa) 966 Elliott, Erickson v. (N. D.). 363 Garner v. Doremus (Mich.). 743 Elliott v. McAllister (Minn.). 921 Garrison, Ogden v. (Neb.). 714 Ely, Ashdown v. (Iowa). 976 Gaskill v. Weeks (Mich.). 647 Empey, Gragg v. (Minn.). 421 Empire Lumber Co., Swing v. (Minn.).. 467 Gem Fibre Package Co., Clemens v. (Mich.) 187 641 431 Employer's Liability Assur. Corporation, 506 G. F. Sanborn Co. v. Alston (Mich.). 625 404 628 59 435 Erickson v. Elliott (N. D.). Erickson v. Elliott (N. D.). Escanaba, Ridgeway v. (Mich.). Eslow v. Albion (Mich.) 361 Golden Rule, The, McQuade v. (Minn.). 484 483 864 .1046 .1027, 1126 Essex v. Douglas (Iowa).. 982 Graef, King v. (Wis.). ..1058 Gragg v. Empey (Minn.). 421 Grand Rapids & I. R. Co.. Chicago & K. 383 Grand Rapids & I. R. Co. v. Kalamazoo .1050 Fabrick, State v. (N. D.).. 864 Granger, Stiles v. (N. D.). 777 Fagan v. Fagan (Neb.). 992 Graves, State v. (Neb.).. 717 Fairchild, State v. (S. D.).. Farmers' Bank of Cuba City, Stuart v. (Wis.) 820 Farmers' Mut. Fire Ins. Co. of Manistee, Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Elm G. S. Blakeslee & Co. v. Reinhold Mfg. Co. |