Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Courts of Common Pleas, and Exchequer Chamber and in the House of Lords;: From Easter Term 36 Geo. III. 1796, to Trinity Term 39 Geo. III. 1799, Both Inclusive. With Tables of the Cases and Principal Matters, 1±ÇGreat Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer Chamber, Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords A. Strahan, law printer to the King's most excellent Majesty, 1814 - 658ÆäÀÌÁö |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
33°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
26 ÆäÀÌÁö
... prisoner were not inforced , for the purpose of making fatisfaction to the Plain- tiff by the durefs of imprisonment . The confinement of the De- fendant's perfon is the only means of compelling payment of the debt ; it is not therefore ...
... prisoner were not inforced , for the purpose of making fatisfaction to the Plain- tiff by the durefs of imprisonment . The confinement of the De- fendant's perfon is the only means of compelling payment of the debt ; it is not therefore ...
27 ÆäÀÌÁö
... prisoner was found abfolutely at large . On this narrow ground , I am prepared to say that the nonfuit was wrong . On the general one , I think it would require fome confideration . Undoubtedly the effect of procefs of execution is to ...
... prisoner was found abfolutely at large . On this narrow ground , I am prepared to say that the nonfuit was wrong . On the general one , I think it would require fome confideration . Undoubtedly the effect of procefs of execution is to ...
28 ÆäÀÌÁö
... prisoner from the bailiff's houfe to his own , and for what purpofe fignifies nothing ; he might as well have carried him to a horse - race . HEATH J. What is faid in Hobart 202. ( a ) is very material . The rule feems to be that a ...
... prisoner from the bailiff's houfe to his own , and for what purpofe fignifies nothing ; he might as well have carried him to a horse - race . HEATH J. What is faid in Hobart 202. ( a ) is very material . The rule feems to be that a ...
32 ÆäÀÌÁö
... prisoner at the time of the former oppofition , the Plaintiff was entitled to the cofts of that oppofition , before the new bail could be fuffered to justify . Sed per Curiam . The Court will not infift on the cofts of a former ...
... prisoner at the time of the former oppofition , the Plaintiff was entitled to the cofts of that oppofition , before the new bail could be fuffered to justify . Sed per Curiam . The Court will not infift on the cofts of a former ...
163 ÆäÀÌÁö
... and brought England as a prisoner at war , is not difabled from fuing while in confinement , on a contract entered into as a prifoner at war . 1797 . SPARENBURGH V. the forces of our faid Lord IN THE THIRTY - EIGHTH YEAR OF GEORGE III .
... and brought England as a prisoner at war , is not difabled from fuing while in confinement , on a contract entered into as a prifoner at war . 1797 . SPARENBURGH V. the forces of our faid Lord IN THE THIRTY - EIGHTH YEAR OF GEORGE III .
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
abfolute action affidavit affignment aforefaid againſt alfo alſo anfwer arife attorney bail bankrupt becauſe bill Blanc Serjt BULLER cafe caſe cauſe circumftances cofts commiffion common law confequence confideration confidered conftruction Court debt declaration deed Defendant demurrer devife diftinction diſcharged Eaft eftate eſtate EYRE Ch faid fame fecond fecurity feems feifed feme covert feoffment fet afide fhall fhew caufe fhip fhould fince firft firſt fome fpecial ftand ftated ftatute fubject fuch fufficient fuit fuppofed fupport ground himſelf houfe houſe iffue indorfed inftance infurance intereft John Whitelock judgment Juftice King's Bench KING'S LYNN laft London Lord Lord Mansfield muft muſt neceffary nonfuit opinion paffed party perfon Plaintiff plea pleaded poffeffion prefent premiſes prifoner purpoſe queftion reafon refident refpect revocation revoked Rothley Runnington ſaid ſhall Shepherd Serjt ſhip ſtated tenant Term Rep thefe theſe thofe thoſe tranfaction unleſs uſe verdict words writ
Àαâ Àο뱸
320 ÆäÀÌÁö - Be it known that as well in own name as for and in the name and names of all and every other person or persons to whom the same doth, may, or shall appertain, in part or in all...
555 ÆäÀÌÁö - For no country ever takes notice of the revenue laws of another. " <The objection, that a contract is immoral or illegal as between plaintiff and defendant, sounds at all times very ill in the mouth of the defendant. It is not for his sake, however, that the objection is ever allowed; but it is founded in general principles of policy, which the defendant has the advantage of, contrary to the real justice, as between him and the plaintiff, by accident, if I may so say. The principle of public policy...
555 ÆäÀÌÁö - The principle of public policy is this; ex dolo malo non oritur actio. No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act.
54 ÆäÀÌÁö - Know all men by these presents, that I, Hattie C. Ruddell, of the county of Beaufort and state of South Carolina, being in ill health but of sound and disposing mind and memory, do make and publish this, my last will and testament...
99 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... the form of the ftatute in fuch cafe made and provided. And...
160 ÆäÀÌÁö - The meaning of which was, that however unwilling the men might be to pay themselves, the officer would take care that they should pay. The question is, Whether the slopman did not in fact rely on the power of the officer over the fund out of which the men's wages were to be paid, and did not prefer giving credit to that fund, rather than to the lieutenant, who, if we are to judge of him by others in the same situation, was not likely to be able to raise so large a sum...
433 ÆäÀÌÁö - It is also understood that the permission granted by this article is not to extend to allow the vessels of the United States to carry on any part of the...
639 ÆäÀÌÁö - Lillie and the defendant, or one of them, their or one of their heirs, executors, or administrators, should and would well and truly pay or cause to be paid unto G.
4 ÆäÀÌÁö - Is the man who has paid over money to another's use to dispute the legality of the original consideration? Having once waived the legality, the money shall never come back into his hands again. Can the defendant then in conscience keep the money so paid? For what purpose should he retain it? To whom is he to pay it over, who is entitled to it but the plaintiff ? EYRE, Ch.
364 ÆäÀÌÁö - Does the omission enable the plaintiff to chuse his own time and place ? If so, the objection would be well founded. I think, that, if an original notice be given specifying the hour and place as well as the day, and that notice be afterwards continued with an alteration of the day only, the latter will refer to the former, and incorporate the hour and place; and that it would be an irregularity in the plaintiff to execute his writ of inquiry at any other hour or place than those mentioned in the...