Prigg vs. Pennsylvania (Fug- itive Slave law). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1842; 16 Peters, 539, STORY, J., Vol. I, 536, 541, 543 Prize Cases, The. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1862; 2 Black, 635, GRIER, J., Vol. II, 124, 126 Propagation of the Gospel,
Society for. See Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. Provincial Fisheries, In re. Sup. Ct. Canada, 1895; 26 Can. Sup. Ct. 444, SIR HENRY STRONG, TASCHEREAU, GWYNNE, GIROUARD, JJ.
Quah, Sah, case of. See Sah
Quah's case. Quarantine Cases. Compagnie Francaise vs. State Board of Health. Minn. & St. P. R. R. Co. vs. Milner. Morgan S. S. Co. vs. Board of Health, La. People vs. Compagnie Generale.
Quarles, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1895; 158 U. S. 532, GRAY, J., Vol. I, 537, 551 Queue, The Chinese Case. See Ho-Ah-Kow vs. Nunan.
Quimby, United States vs.
United States vs. Quimby.
Quock Ting vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 140 U. S. 417, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Quong Woo, In re. See United States vs. Quong Woo. Quong Woo, United States vs. See United States vs. Quong Woo.
163 U. S. 504, WHITE, J., Vol. II, 33, 34, 63, 86, 130,132 133, 134, 214 Race Horse, Ward vs. See Ward vs. Race Horse. Radford, Craig vs. See Craig
vs. Radford. Rahrer, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1891; 140 U. S. 545, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. II, Rahtjen's &c. Co., Holzapfel's &c. Co. vs. See Holzapfel's &c. Co. vs. Rahtjen's &c. Co. Railroad Co., Dennick vs. See Dennick vs. R. R. Co. Railroad Companies. See Bell vs. Atl. & Pac. R. R. Co. Bell's Gap R. R. Co. VS. Pennsylvania. Buffalo R. & P. R. R. Co. vs. Lavery. Buttz vs. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. Capital Traction Co. vs. Hof. Cherokee Nation vs. Southern Kansas Ry. Co. Chicago, Milwaukee &c. R. R. Co. vs. Tompkins. Chicago, Rock Island and Pac. R. R. Co. vs. McGlinn. Dennick vs. R. R. Co. Fort Leavenworth R. R. Co. vs. Lowe. Herman vs. New Orleans R. R. Co. Hubgh vs. New Orleans R. R. Co. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. Illinois. Leavenworth &c. R. R. Co. vs. United States. Metropolitan R. R. Co. vs. Dist. of Col. Minn. & St. P. R. R. vs. Milner. Missouri, K. & T. R. R. Co. vs. Roberts. Missouri, K. & T. R R. Co. vs. United States. Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. vs. Ken- ney. Phila. & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. Stimpson. Pittsburgh & Southern Coal Co. vs. Bates. St. Paul &c. Ry. Co. VS. Phelps. Stroud vs. Missouri River R. R. Co. United States vs. Joint Traffic Assn. United States vs. Union Pa- cific Ry. Co. Utah & Nor. R. R. Co. vs. Fisher. Ramsey, Murphy vs. phy vs. Ramsey.
NICHOLLS, Ch. J., Vol. II, 53, 55 | Rauscher, United States
Race Horse, In re. U.S. Cir.
Ct. Wyoming, 1895; 70 Fed. Rep. 598, RINER, J., reversed sub nomine Ward vs. Race Horse. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896;
See United States vs. Rauscher. Ravesies vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. Alabama, 1889; 37 Fed. Rep. 447, PARDEE, J.,
Raymond vs. Thomas. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1875; 91 U. S. 712, SWAYNE, J., Vol. I, 500, 551 Real Estate Co., Beck vs. See Flournoy &c. Co. vs. Beck. Realty Co., United States vs. See United States vs. Realty Co.
Reeder, Crane vs. See Crane vs. Reeder.
Reid, Webster vs. See Web- ster vs. Reid. Reilly, Roberts vs. erts vs. Reilly.
S. D. N. Y. 1889; 39 Fed. Rep. 204, BROWN, J., Vol. II, 266, 275 Rent (Tory) Case. See Rutgers
vs. Waddington. Repentigny, United States vs. See United States vs. Repen- timmy. Republic Francaise, La vs. Schultz. U. S. Cir. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1893; 57 Fed. Rep. 37, TOWNSEND, J., Vol. II, Republic of Hawaii, Lewis vs. See Lewis vs. Hawaii. Republic of Hawaii, Peacock
vs. See Peacock vs. Hawaii, &c.
Respublica VS. De Long- champs. Oyer & Terminer, Phila., 1784; 1 Dallas, 111, MCKEAN, J., Vol. II, Respublica vs. Gordon. Sup. Ct. Penna. 1788; 1 Dallas, 252, MCKEAN, Ch. J., Vol. II, Respublica vs. Sweers. Sup. Ct. Penna. 1779; 1 Dallas, 45, MCKEAN, Ch. J., Vol. I, 537 543
Rhodes vs. Iowa. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1898; 170 U. S. 412, WHITE, J., Vol. I, 547, 548 Rhodes, United States vs. See United States vs. Rhodes. Rice, United States vs. See United States vs. Rice. Richter vs. Reynolds. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1893; 17 U. S. App. 427, DALLAS, J., Vol. II, Ridgway vs. Hays. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col. 1836; 5 Cranch, 23, CRANCH, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Riggs, Geofroy vs. See Geofroy vs. Riggs.
Rio Arriba L. & C. Co. vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1897; 167 U. S. 298, FUL- LER, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Rio Grande Dam &c. Co., Uni- ted States vs. See United States vs. Rio Grande Dam &c. Co.
Risch, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct.
Texas, 1888; 36 Fed. Rep. 546, SABIN, J., Vol. II, Ritchie, United States vs. See United States vs. Ritchie. Rixner's Succession. Sup. Ct. Louis'a, 1896; 48 L. Ann. 552, WATKINS, J., Vol. II, Robbins vs. Shelby Taxing District. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1887; 120 U. S. 489, BRAD- LEY, J., Vol. I, Roberts vs. Reilly. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1885; 116 U. S. 80, MAT- THEWS, J., Vol. I.,
46, 79, 83 Roberts vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. Claims, 1 Devereux, 31, BLACKFORD, J., Vol. II, Roberts, Missouri, K. & T. R. R. Co. vs. See Missouri, K. & T. R. R. Co. vs. Roberts. Roberts, Standley vs. See Stand- ley vs. Roberts.
Robertson vs. Baldwin. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1897; 165 U. S. 275, BROWN, J., Vol. I, Robertson, Bartram VS. See Bartram vs. Robertson. Robertson, Edye vs. See Edye vs. Robertson or Head Money Cases. Robertson, Netherclift VS. See Netherclift vs. Robertson. Robertson, Whitney vs. See Whitney vs. Robertson.
Robins (Nash alias), United States vs. See United States
vs. Nash (alias Robins).
Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1895; 29 U. S. App. 468, GIL- BERT, J., Vol. II,
Robouam's Heirs vs. Robo- uam's Exrs. Sup. Ct. Louisiana, 1838; 12 La. (0. S.) 73, MARTIN, J., Vol. II, Rochester, Blight VS. See Blight vs. Rochester. Rodgers, United States vs. See United States vs. Rodgers (two cases).
Rodriguez, In re. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Texas, 1897; 81 Fed. Rep. 337, MAXEY, J., Vol. II, 'Rogers, United States vs. See United States vs. Rogers. Roland, Ladiga vs. See Ladiga vs. Roland.
Ropes vs. Clinch. U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1871; 8 Blatchford, 304; Fed. Cas. 12,041, WOODRUFF, J., Vol. II, Rose vs. Himeley. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1808; 4 Cranch, 241, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I,
537, 544 551, 552 358, 361
Rose, United States vs. United States vs. Rose. Roselius, United States vs. See United States vs. Roselius. Ross vs. Eells. U. S. Cir. Ct. Washington, 1893; 56 Fed. Rep. 855, HANDFORD, J., Vol. II, Ross vs. United States. U.S. Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29 Ct. of Clms. 176, RICHARDSON, Ch. J.
Ross, Bauman vs. See Bauman vs. Ross.
Ross, Eells vs. See Eells vs. Ross.
Ross, Ex parte. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Ohio, 1869; 2 Bond, 252; Fed. Cas. 12,069, LEAVITT, J., Vol. II,
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 140 U. S. 453, FIELD, J., Vol. 1, 54, 537, 541, 545, 552 553, 556, 557, 559, 560 64, 139, 140, 238, 333 335, 345, 346 U. S. Dist. Ct. 1883; 15 Fed.
Rep. 506, BROWN, J., Vol. II, 267 Roulet, Alexander vs. See Al
exander vs. Roulet.
Roulet, New York Ins. Co. vs.
See New York Ins. Co. vs. Roulet.
Rowe, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct. 8th Cir. Ct. 1896; 77 Fed. Rep. 161, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II, 267 Ruiz, Ornelas vs. See Ornelas vs. Ruiz.
Russian Deserter Case. See United States, &c., vs. Alexandroff.
VS. Waddington
(Tory Rent Case). Mayor's Ct. N. Y. City, 1784; Vol. II, 36 Sah Quah's Case. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Alaska, 1886; 31 Fed. Rep. 327, DAWSON, J., Vol, I, 554 556, 557, 559, 562 166, 168, 235
Sailors Snug Harbor, Inglis vs. See Inglis vs. Sailors Snug Harbor.
St. Oloff, The. U. S. Dist.
Ct. 1790; 2 Peters Adm. Rep. 428, PETERS, J., Vol. II, 330, 331 St. Oloff, Weiburg vs. See Weiburg vs. St. Oloff. St. Paul &c. Ry. Co. VS. Phelps. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1890; 137 U. S. 528, LAMAR, J., Vol. II,
Salamoni, Feol vs. See Feol vs. Salamoni.
Sala's Succession. Sup. Ct. Louisiana, 1898; 50 La. Ann.
1009, NICHOLLS, Ch. J.,
Jugiro, In re Shibuya. Ship Apollo, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of Clms. 411, PEELLE, J., Vol. II, Ship Betsey, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1888; 23 Ct. of Clms. 277, NOTT, J., Vol. II, 284 Ship Concord, The. U. S. Ct.
of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of Clms. 432, NOTT, Ch. J., Vol. II, Ship Ganges, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1896; 31 Ct. of Clms., 17, DAVIS, J., Vol. II, Ship Jane, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1889; 24 Ct. of Clms. 74, NOTT, J., Vol. II, Ship Juliana, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of Clms. 400, PEELLE, J., Vol. II, Ship Parkman, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of Clms. 406, WELDON, J., Vol. II, Ship Richmond vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815; 9 Cranch, 102, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, Ship Star, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of Cims. 387, WELDON, J., Vol. II, Ship Tom, The. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1893; 29 Ct. of Clms., 68, NOTT, J., Vol. II,
Ships, names of. See Vessels,
Silver Bow Co., Talbot vs. See Talbot vs. Silver Bow Co. Slaughterhouse Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1872; 16 Wallace, 36, MILLER, J., Vol. I, 53, 62, 537 541, 543, 550, 556, 557, 583 Vol. II, 1, 56, 57, 58, 59 Slidell vs. Grandjean. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1883; 111 U. S. 412, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Sloop Betsey, Glass, vs. The. See Glass vs. The Sloop Betsey.
Smith vs. State of Maryland. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1810; 6 Cranch, 286, WASHINGTON, J., Vol. I, 557 Vol. II,
16, 318 Smith vs. Turner (Passen- ger cases). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1849; 7 Howard, 283, Vol. II, 51 Smith (Famous) vs. United
States. See Famous Smith vs. United States.
Smith, State (So. Car.) vs. See State So. Car. vs. Smith. Smith, Thorington vs. See Thor- ington vs. Smith.
Snow vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1873; 18 Wallace, 317, BRADLEY, J., Vol. I, 539 Snug Harbor, Sailors', Inglis See Inglis vs. Sailors' Snug Harbor. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Hartland. U. S. Cir. Ct. 1814; 2 Payne, 536; Fed. Cas. 13155, THOMPSON, J., Vol. II, Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Pawlett. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830; 4 Peters, 480, STORY, J., Vol. II, Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Town of New Haven. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1823; 8 Wheaton, 464, WASHINGTON, J., Vol. II, 12, 131, 146 78 Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Wheeler. U. S. Cir. Ct. New Hampshire, 1814; 2 Matthews, 105; Fed. Cas. 13156, STORY, J., Vol. II,
118, 129, 538 539, 541 159, 314
Dist. Ct. Cala. 1884; 10 Saw- yer, 268, HOFFMAN, J., Vol. II,
Short vs. Deacon. Sup. Ct. Penna. 1823; 10 Sarg. & Rawle, 125, TILGHMAN, Ch. J., Vol. II, Shoup, Opel vs. See Opel vs. Shoup.
Sibbald, United States vs. See United States vs. Sibbald. Siebold, Ex parte. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1879; 100 U. S. 371,
« 이전계속 » |