ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

Page

(Chinese Laundry Case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1885; 113 U. S. 703, FIELD, J., Vol. II, 131 Soulard VS. United States (Smith vs. United States). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830; 4 Peters, 511, MARSHALL, Ch. J., and 1836, 10 Peters, 100 and 326, BALDWIN, J., Vol. I, 538, 554, 559 Vol. II, 147, 165, 178 Southack, Fox vs. See Fox vs. Southack.

South Carolina Dispensary
Case. See Cantini vs. Till-

[blocks in formation]

Vol. II, Spoliation Claims. See French

Spoliation Cases.

Sprague vs. Thompson. U.

S. Sup. Ct. 1886; 118 U. S. 90, MATTHEWS, J., Vol. I, Sprague, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Sprague. Springville vs. Thomas. U.

548

S. Sup. Ct. 1897; 166 U. S. 707, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 539 Spybuck, Summers VS. See

Summers vs. Spybuck.
Stairs vs. Peaslee. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1855; 18 Howard,
521, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I,
Standley vs. Roberts. U. S.
Cir. Ct. App. 8 Cir. 1894; 59
Fed. Rep. 836, SANBORN, J.,
Vol. II,

Stanton, Georgia VS. See
Georgia vs. Stanton.
Star, The Ship. See Ship Star,
The.

[blocks in formation]

167

221

State of Arkansas, Wilburn vs. See Wilburn vs. State of Arkansas,

State of California, Almy vs. See Almy vs. California. State of California, Hurtado vs. See Hurtado vs. California. State of California, McCall vs. See McCall vs. California. State of California, People of, vs. Gerke. See People vs. Gerke.

State of California, People of, vs. Naglee. See People vs. Naglee.

State of California, People of, vs. Washington. See Peo

Page

ple (Cala.) vs. Washington. State of Georgia vs. Brailsford. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1794; 3 Dallas, 1, JAY, Ch. J., (and other justices), Vol. II, State of Georgia vs. Stanton. See Georgia vs. Stanton. State of Georgia, Cherokee Nation vs. See Cherokee Nation vs. State of Georgia. State of Georgia, Chisholm vs. See Chisholm vs. Georgia. State of Georgia, Lascelles vs. See Lascelles vs. Georgia. State of Georgia, Worcester vs. See Worcester vs. Georgia. State of Illinois, Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. See Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Ker vs. See Ker vs. State of Illinois. State of Illinois, Moore VS. See Moore vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Munn vs. See Munn vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Spies vs. Spies vs. Illinois.

See

11

[blocks in formation]

son vs.

See Frederickson vs.

State of Louisiana. State of Louisiana, Kennard vs. See Kennard vs. Louisiana. State of Louisiana, New Hampshire vs. See New Hampshire vs. Louisiana. State of Louisiana, New York Same as New Hampshire

VS.

Page

vs. Louisiana. State of Louisiana, Treas'r of, Poydras vs. See Poydras vs. Treasurer of Louisiana. State of Maine vs. Newell. Sup. Ct. Maine, 1892; 84 Maine, 465, EMERY, J., Vol. II, State of Maryland, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Maryland. State of Maryland, McCulloch vs. See McCulloch vs. Maryland.

State of Maryland, Smith vs. See Smith vs. State of Maryland. State of Maryland vs. Warren. See Maryland vs. Warren. State of Massachusetts, Manchester vs. See Manchester vs. Massachusetts. State of Massachusetts, Rhode Island vs. See Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. State of Massachusetts, Sheafe VS. See Commonwealth vs. Sheafe.

VS.

State of Massachusetts, Thurlow
See License Cases.
State of Michigan, People of, vs.
Tyler. See People (Mich.)vs.
Tyler.
State of Minnesota vs. Camp-
bell. Sup. Ct. Minu. 1893;
53 Minn. 354, MITCHELL, J.,
Vol. II,
State of Missouri vs. Andriano,
See Missouri vs. Andriano.
State of Missouri, Brooks vs.
See Brooks vs. Missouri.
State of Missouri, Cummings vs.
See Cummings vs. Missouri.
State of Missouri, Emert vs.
See Emert vs. Missouri.
State of Missouri vs. Lewis,
See Missouri vs. Lewis.
State of Nebraska, Boyd vs.
See Boyd vs. Nebraska.
State of Nevada, Crandall vs.
See Crandall vs. Nerada.
State of New Hampshire vs.

229

230

Page

Louisiana. See New Hampshire vs. Louisiana. State of New Hampshire, Pierce vs. See License Cases. State of New Jersey vs. Wilson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1812; 7 Cranch, 164, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, State of New Jersey, Brown vs. See Brown vs. New Jersey. State of New York vs. Dibble. See Cutler vs. Dibble. State of New York vs. Louisiana. Same as New Hampshire vs. Louisiana. State of New York (People of), Canal Appraisers vs. See Canal Appraisers vs. People. State of New York (People) vs. Conklin. See People (N. Y.) vs. Conklin.

State of New York, People &c.

vs. Curtis. See People (N. Y.) &c., vs. Curtis. State of New York, (People of,)

vs. McLeod. See People (N. Y.) vs. McLeod.

State of New York, People &c. vs. Stout. See People (N. Y.) &c., vs. Stout.

State of New York, People of vs. Warren. See People (N. Y.) vs. Warren.

State (North Dakota) ex rel. Tompton vs. Donoyer. Sup. Ct. N. Dak. 1897; 6 No. Dak. 586, BARTHOLOMEW, J., Vol. II,

230

214

State (Ohio) vs. Vanderpool.
Sup. Ct. Ohio, 1883; 39 Ohio,
273, JOHNSON, Ch. J., Vol. II, 271
274

State of Oregon, Lane vs. See
Lane vs. Oregon.

State of Penna. vs. Wheeling
Bridge Co. See Pennsyl
vania vs. Wheeling Bridge
Co.

State of Penna., Bell's Gap R. R.

Co. vs. See Bell's Gap R. R.
Co. vs. Pennsylvania.
State of Penna., Phila. &
Southern S. S. Co. vs. See
Phila. & Southern S. S. Co.
vs. Pennsylvania.

State of Penna., Prigg vs. See

Prigg vs. Pennsylvania. State of Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. See Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts.

State of Rhode Island, Fletcher vs. See License Cases. State (So. Car.) vs. Smith. Ct. Appeals, So. Car. 1829; 1 Bailey, So. Car. Law. 283; 19 Am. Decisions, 679, JOHNSON, J., Vol. II, State of Tennessee, Coleman VS. See Coleman vs. Ten

nessee.

State of Tennessee vs. Davis.
See Tennessee vs. Davis.
State of Tennessee, Henderson
VS. See Henderson vs. Ten-

nessee.

State of Tennessee, Van Brock-
lin vs. See Van Brocklin vs.
State of Tennessee.
State of Texas vs. White. See
Texas vs. White.

State of Texas, Asher vs. See
Asher vs. Texas.

Page

State (Texas), Blandford vs.
See Blandford vs. State.
State of Texas, United States
VS. See United States vs.
Texas (two cases).
State of Texas, White vs. See
White vs. Texas.
State of Utah, Thompson vs.
See Thompson vs. Utah.
State of Vermont vs. Brews-
ter. Sup. Ct. Vermont,
1835; 7 Vt. 118, PHELPS, J.,
Vol. II,
State of Vermont vs. Society
for the Propagation of the
Gospel. U. S. Cir. Ct. Ver-
mont, Fed. Cas. 16919 and
16920, 1826, THOMPSON, J.,
Vol. II,
State of Vermont, O'Neill vs.
See O'Neill vs. Vermont.
State of Virginia, Cohens vs.
See Cohens vs. Virginia.
Steamboat Company
Livingston.

VS.

New York Ct.

of Errors, 1825; 3 Cowen, 713, SANDFORD Chan., Vol. I, Steamer Spark vs. Lee Choi Chum. U. S. Cir. Ct, Cal. 1 Sawyer, 713, Sawyer, J., Vol. II, Steamship &c. Companies. Compagnie Francaise vs. State Board of Health. Huus vs. N. Y. & Porto Rico S. S. Co. Liverpool &c. Stm. Co. vs. Phoenix Ins. Co. Monongahela Nav. Co. vs. United

278

278

12

549

342

States. Morgan S. S. Co. vs. La. Board of Health. New Orleans vs. Steamship Co. North German Lloyd S. S. Co. vs. Hedden. North German Lloyd S. S. Co. vs. Magone. People vs. Compagnie Generale &c. Phila. & Sou. S. S. Co. vs. Pennsylvania. Steamboat Co vs. Livingstone. Thingvalla Line vs. United States.

Page

Stearns vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1867; 6 Wallace, 589, SWAYNE, J., Vol. I, 538 551, 554 Steele, Lawton vs. See Law

ton vs. Steele.

Steele Co. (Illinois), Budzisz
VS. See Budzisz vs. Illinois
Steel Co.

Stephens vs. Cherokee Na-
tion. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1899;
174 U. S. 445, FULLER,
Ch. J., Vol. II,
202
Sternaman vs. Peck. U. S.
Cir. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1897;
80 Fed. Rep. 883, WALLACE,
J., affirming Ex parte Stern-
aman. U. S. Dist. Ct. N. D.
N. Y. 1896; 77 Fed. Rep.
595, COXE, J., reargument de-
nied, 83 Fed. Rep. 690, Vol. II, 267
Sternaman, Ex parte. See

Sternaman vs. Peck. Stevens vs. Thatcher. Sup. Ct. Maine, 1897; 91 Maine, 70, EMERY, J., Vol. II, 34, 214 Stewart vs. Callaghan. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col. 1835; 4 Cranch, C. C. 594, PER CURIAM, Vol. II, Stimpson, Philadelphia & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. See Philadelphia & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. Stimpson.

[blocks in formation]

298

141, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 547, 583 Stout, People N. Y. ex rel.

539

Young vs. See People (N. Y.) &c. vs. Stout, Strader vs. Graham. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1850; 10 Howard, 98, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, Strike Cases. See In re Debs. Strother vs. Lucas. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1832; 6 Peters, 763, THOMPSON, J., Vol. I, 538, 539 553, 554, 559

[blocks in formation]

See United States vs. Stur-
geon.

Sturges vs. Crowninshield.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1819; 4
Wheaton, 122, MARSHALL,
Ch. J., Vol. I,
Sturges vs. The Collector &c.

549

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1870; 12 Wallace, 19, CLIFFORD, J., Vol. II, 74 Succession of Pargoud. See Pargoud, Succession of. Succession of Rabasse. See Rabasse, Succession of.

[blocks in formation]

United States vs. Sunol. Sulphur, D. & M. Co., Utah M. & Mfg. Co. vs. See Utah M. & Mfg. Co. vs. Dickert & M. Sulphur Co. Swan, The. U. S. Dist. Ct. Washington, 1892; 50 Fed. Rep. 108; HANDFORD, J., Vol. I, 537, 557

Swan, The James G., United
States vs. See United States
vs. The James G. Swan.
Sweers, Republica vs. See Re-
publica vs. Sweers.
Taber vs. United States. U.S.
Cir. Ct. Mass. 1839; 1 Story,
1, STORY, J., Vol. I,
Talbott vs. Jansen. U. S.

Sup. Ct. 1795; Dallas, 133
RUTLEDGE, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Talbott vs. Silver Bow Co.

U. S. 438, BREWER,

Vol. I,

Taltan vs. Mayes. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896; 163 U. S. 376, WHITE, J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

562

221, 231

Tamerling vs. U. S. Freehold and Emigration Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1876; 93 U. S. 644, DAVIS, J., Vol. II,

Tampico Duty Case. See Fleming vs. Page.

185

34

Taylor vs. Brown. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1893; 147 U. S. 640,
FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Taylor vs. Morton. U. S. Cir.
Ct. Mass. 1855; 2 Curtis, 454,
CURTIS, J. Same case affirmed
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1862; 2 Black,
481, CLIFFORD, J., Vol. I, 448
544, 559, 560, 561
Vol. II, 63, 68, 69, 71, 72, 183, 361
Taylor, United States vs. See
United States vs. Taylor.

Tax Cases. See License Tax
Cases, The. Knowlton vs.
Moore (War Revenue Tax).
Philadelphia S. S. S. Co. vs.
Pennsylvania. Pollock vs.
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
(Income Tax of 1894). Veasie
vs. Moor (State Bank Tax).
Taxing District, Shelby, Robbins
vs. See Robbins vs. Shelby
Taxing District.
Taylor, Shepard vs.

See Shep

ard vs. Taylor. Tennessee vs. Davis. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1879; 100 U..S. 257, STRONG, J., Vol. I, 537, 543, 551 556, 557 Coleman vs. See

Tennessee,

Coleman vs. Tennessee.

Tennessee, Henderson vs. See
Henderson vs. Tennessee.
Tennessee, State of, Van Brock-
lin vs.
See Van Brocklin vs.
Tennessee.

Territory of Arizona, Marsh vs.
See Marsh vs. Arizona.
Texas vs. White. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1868; 7 Wallace, 700, CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 250, 537 541, 543, 557 Texas, State of, Asher vs. See

Asher vs. Texas.

549

124

Texas, State of, Blandford vs. See Blandford vs. State. Texas, United States vs. See

Page

United States vs. Texas (2
cases).

Thatcher, Stevens VS. See
Stevens vs. Thatcher.
Thayer, Nebraska ex rel., Boyd

219

VS. See Boyd vs. Nebraska. Thebo vs. Choctaw Tribe of Indians. U. S. Cir. Ct. Appeals, 8th Cir. 1895; 66 Fed. Rep. 372, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II, Thingvalla Line vs. United States. U. S. Ct. Claims, 1889; 24 Ct. Clms. 255, RICHARDSON, Ch. J., Vol. II, 77, 301 Thirty Hogsheads of Sugar vs. Boyle. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815; 9 Cranch, 191, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, 498, 551 557

Thomas vs. Gay. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1898; 169 U. S. 264,
SHIRAS, J., Vol. I,
Vol. II,

539, 547 86, 221

Thomas vs. United States.
U.S. Ct. Claims, 1 Devereux,
29, BLACKFORD, J., Vol. II, 298
Thomas, Danforth vs. See
Danforth vs. Thomas.
Thomas, In re. U. S. Dist.

Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1874; 12
Blatch. 370, Fed. Cas. 13,887,
BLATCHFORD, J., Vol. II, 267
Thomas, Raymond vs.
Raymond vs. Thomas.

See

Thomas, Springville vs.

See

Springville vs. Thomas.

[blocks in formation]

Bales of Cotton. See Am.
Ins. Co. vs. Canter.

Thurlow vs. Massachusetts. See
License Cases.

Tiburcio Parrott, In re. See

Parrott, In re Tiburcio. Tillman, Cantini vs. See Cantini vs. Tillman. Tingy, Bas vs. See Bas vs. Tingy.

Titusville, Brennan vs. See Brennan vs. Titusville. Tobacco Factory, United States VS. See United States vs. Tobacco Factory.

Tobin vs. Wilkinshaw (three cases). U. S. Cir. Ct. Cala. 1855 and 1856; 1 McAllister, 26, 151, 186; Fed. Cas. 14,068-69-70, MCALLISTER, J., Vol. II, Tompkins, Chicago, Mil. &c. R. R. Co. vs. See Chicago, Mil. &c. R. R. Co. vs. Tompkins.

Tompton, State &c. vs. Donoyer. See State (Nor. Dak.) vs. Donoyer. Tom Yum, In re.

U S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1894; 64 Fed. Rep. 485, MORROW, J., Vol. II, Toombs, Hornbuckle vs. See Hornbuckle vs. Toombs. Topeka, Loan Ass'n vs. See Loan Ass'n vs. Topeka. Tory Rent Case. See Rutgers vs. Waddington.

Page

179

119

Town vs. De Haven. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Oregon, 1878; 5 Saw-
yer, 146; Fed. Cas. 14,113,
SAWYER, J., Vol. II, 83, 168
Town of New Haven, Society
for the Propagation of the
Gospel vs. See Society &c.
vs. Town of New Haven.
Town of Titusville, Brennan vs.
See Brennan vs. Titusville.
Toy Long, Chapman vs. See
Chapman vs. Toy Long.
Trade Mark Cases. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1879; 100 U. S. 82, MILL-
ER, J., Vol. II, 244, 324, 326
Traffic Ass'n, Joint, United
States vs. See United States
vs. Joint Traffic Ass'n.
Treasurer of Louisiana Poyd-
ras VS. See Poydras vs.
Treasurer of Louisiana.
Truscott vs. Hurlburt L. &c.
Co. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »