ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub
[ocr errors]

Then as to the natural theological questions which (owing to circumstances needless now to bo recalled or explained) are here throughout brought into what most naturalists, and some other readers, may deem undue prominence, there are many who may be interested to know how these increasingly prevalent views and their tendencies are regarded by one who is scientifically, and in his own fashion, a Darwinian, philosophically a convinced theist, and religiously an acceptor of the "creed commonly called the Nicene," as the exponent of the Christian faith.

"Truth emerges sooner from error than from confusion," says Bacon; and clearer views than commonly prevail upon the points at issue regarding "religion and science" are still sufficiently needed to justify these endeavors.

BOTANIC GARDEN, CAMBRIDGE, Mass., June, 1876.

CONTENTS.

This Table of Contents, and the coplous Index to the volume, we
obligingly prepared by the Rev. G. F. WRIGHT, of Andover,

ARTICLE I.

THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION.
Views and Definitions of Species.-How Darwin's differs from that
of Agassiz, and from the Common View.—Variation, its Causes
unknown.-Darwin's Genealogical Tree.-Darwin and Agassiz
agree in the Capital Facts.-Embryology.-Physical Connec
tion of Species compatible with Intellectual Connection.-How
to prove Transmutation.-Known Extent of Variation.-Cause
of Likeness unknown,-Artificial Selection.-Reversion.-In-
terbreeding.-Natural Selection.-Classification tentative.-
What Darwin assumes.-Argument stated.-How Natural So
lection works-Where the Argument is weakest.-Objections.
-Morphology and Teleology harmonized:-Theory not athe
Istical.--Conecivable Modes of Relation of God to Nature

PAGS

ARTICLE II.

DESIGN versus NECESSITY-A DISCUSSION.

How Design in Nature can be shown.-Design not inconsistent
with Indirect Attainment

[ocr errors]

PART II.-Limitations of Theory conceded by Darwin.—What Dar-
winism explains.ivological Argument strong in the Tertiary
Period,―Correspondence between Rank and Geological Sue.
cession.-Difficulties in Classification.-Nature of Affluity.-
No Absolute Distinction between Vegetable and Animal King.
doms,➡ Individuality,—Gradation

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

PART III.-Theoriés contrasted. —Early Arguments against Darwin-
ism.-Philosophical and Theological Objections.—Theory may
. be theistic.-Final Cause not excluded.—Cause of Variation
unknown.-Three Views of Efficient Cause compatible with
Theism.-Agassiz's Objections of a Philosophical Nature.-

Minor Objections.—Conclusion

87

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

ARTICLE Y.

BEQUOIA AND ITS HISTORY: THE RELATIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN TO NORTH-

KANTERN ASIAN and to TERTIARY VEGETATION.

Age and Size of Sequoia.—Isolation.—Decadence.-Related Go
nera.—Former Distribution.—Similarity between the Flora of
Japan and that of the United States, especially on the Atlantic
Side,—Former Glaciation as explaining the Present Dispersion
of Species.-This confirmed by the Arctic Fossil Flora of the
Tertiary Perlod.—Tertiary Flora derived from the Preceding
Cretaceous,--Order and Adaptation in Orgaule Nature likened
to a Flow,—Order Implies an Ordalner

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

PAGE

[ocr errors]

ARTICLE VIIL

[ocr errors]

Dr. Hodge's Book with this Title criticised.-He declares that Dar
winism is Atheism, yet its Founder a Theist-Darwinism

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

ARTICLE X.

INSECTIVOROUS PLANTS.

[ocr errors]
« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »