페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

when the conditions are so varied by different chemists - alkaline or acid solutions, hot or ordinary temperatures, excess of permanganate or notthat the standards given by different authorities would be of little use here. Some German chemists multiply the amount of oxygen absorbed from the permanganate by 20, and call the figure "organic matter."' Over 0.2 part absorbed oxygen is the usual limit, though some allow more. The limits suggested by Frankland and Tidy for the processes which they have respectively investigated and described are:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Several cases have been recorded where the standard limits mentioned have not been reached, and waters have been polluted to a sufficient extent to cause disease.

Local standards may be established more safely than such general ones, since the pure waters of a given district have usually the same general characters. In the case of a suspected well it is advisable to have an analysis of a neighboring well known to be pure, or at least presumably so, for comparison.

The necessity for obtaining all the information possible about a water, as well as the results of the chemical examination, is clearly of the greatest importance in deciding upon the safety of any particular supply. As a rule, too much is expected of chemists to whom water may be sent for analysis, and too little is done by those interested most in the matter, in the way of careful examination of the surroundings of their sources of water supply.

Professor Church gives an account of a well in a small English town which suddenly dried up without apparent cause. An investigation showed that a neighbor had had a water-closet close by, but had taken it out, and had substituted an earth closet, thereby cutting off the supply from the well.' The case seems an extreme one, but numbers of cases almost as bad are to be found on record.

In connection with these remarks it may be of interest to present analyses of some waters, etc., which have been accused, on very good grounds, of having transmitted or caused disease. The evidence with regard to some cannot be looked upon as absolutely conclusive, and indeed, with regard to almost all, some caution is used with those describing the sources and their surroundings, in asserting that these waters were positively the sole and only source of the contagion, though the evidence points very strongly in that direction.

It is noticeable that in some of these cases the chemical analysis, interpreted according to some of the standards quoted, failed to indicate contamination.

1 Fischer, Chem. Techn. des Wassers, p. 139.

2 Plain Words about Water. London, 1877.

[graphic]

Analyses of Drinking-Waters which have communicated or produced (?) Disease. (Results in parts per 100,000.)

[blocks in formation]

Analyst

Chlorine

Phosphoric acid.

Nitrogen in nitrates....

Nitrogen in nitrites.

Free ammonia.

Albuminoid ammonia

Organic carbon..

Oxygen absorbed '.

Hardness.

Organic and volatile

Total solids.

1 Tidy's test.

"Lime.

REFERENCES AND NOTES TO PRECEDING TABLE.

Nos. 1 and 2, Germantown, Pa. -From the same well. Taken nine days apart, during the prevalence of the epidemic. The "total solids" recorded under No. 1, was from still another sample. A child living some distance from the place drank some of the water and sickened in consequence, otherwise the cases were among those living in the neighborhood and using the water. Well, ten feet from a brick sewer, which was somewhat choked at that point.-Chemical News, xliii., 183.

No. 3, Fairhaven, Mass.-First case, September 30th; second case, October 3d; third case, October 6th; fourth and fifth cases, October 7th; sixth case, October 8th; seventh case, October 9th; eighth, mild case, middle of October.

The entire family. No others took the disease except the nurse and her mother who nursed her. Neither of them drank any of the water. Well, one hundred feet from privy vault. Connection between the two proved by throwing salt into the privy vault and finding an increase in the chlorides in the well a few days later." Massachusetts State Board of Health Report for 1879," Supp., p. 270.

No. 4, Scituate, Mass.-Examination made about a month after the disease prevailed in the family and among neighbors who drank the water. None of the cases fatal. Only three other cases (a mile away) in the town previous to the outbreak at this spot. Well, thirty feet from privy. Water contained bacteria and infusoria.—“ Massachusetts State Board of Health Report for 1879," Supp., p. 273.

No. 5, Grouville, Island of Jersey.-Female Orphans' Home. House isolated. Well, sixty feet from an old cesspool used only for urine and soapsuds at the time of the outbreak. Disease apparently generated de novo. No new cases occurred after the pump was removed.-Chemical News, xl., 97.

No. 6, Eagley, near Bolton, England.-Brook received the excreta of operatives at a factory, among which one man had typhoid fever. Water said to have been used only to wash the milk cans. No one affected except those who drank the milk from this dairy." Massachusetts State Board of Health Report for 1877," p. 123.

No. 7, New York, Manhattan Island—Asylum.--Well over one hundred feet deep. No ostensible cause for the appearance of the disease, except communication through the drinking-water. Sewage appeared to reach the well in about two hours from the time of deposition in the sewer. Connection between sewer and well proved by appli

cation of the "lithia test."

No. 8, Broad St., St. James Parish, London, England, 1854.-The number of cases is unknown; 609 deaths are believed to have resulted directly or indirectly from drinking the water of this well. Of two factories situated side by side, the workmen in one drank the water and were almost all attacked, while in the other, other water was drunk and the workmen escaped. An old lady, living entirely outside of the affected district, drank the water, as did also her niece living with her, and both died of the disease. No one else in their immediate neighborhood was attacked. The well was closed up at the time, but opened a year after the outbreak and pumped out, after which this sample was taken.-Sixth Report Rivers Pollution Commission," p. 497. Cistern (wooden),

No. 9, New Orleans, La.-Odor of the water, like swamp water. old and rotten.-"Report on the Water Supply of New Orleans and Mobile. Smart.

National Board of Health Bulletin," vol. i., 317.

Dr. Chas.

No. 10, Mobile, Ala.-Case similar to the last. With regard to this, Dr. Smart notes particularly that the fever "prevailed in the absence of prominent sources of malarial exhalation to account for the presence of the disease."-" National Board of Health Bulletin," i., 317.

No. 11, Rye Beach, Mass.-Digestive disturbance caused, "characterized by a sensation of giddiness and nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, severe abdominal pain, all of which was accompanied by fever, loss of appetite, continued indigestion, and mental depression.' Ice taken from a shallow pond choked with marsh mud and decomposing sawdust, and used in the hotel where all the cases occurred.-"Massachusetts State Board of Health Report for 1876," p. 467.

VOL. II.-28

1

Testing Connection of Well and Cesspool, etc.-Wells in the neighborhood of houses are especially liable to contamination from the cesspool, drain or privy vault. The most convenient mode of testing whether any connection exists between the well and such possible sources of contamination, is by adding to the cesspool or privy vault some soluble compound, and testing for its presence in the well. Sometimes large quantities of salt are thrown in, and the well water is then tested for an increase in the proportion of chlorides. This method may be affected by temporary or local conditions, and is, on that account, inferior to the more expensive method of throwing soluble lithium salts into the cesspool, sewer, etc., and testing the water afterward for the presence of lithia. Except in the water of mineral springs, lithia is of rare occurrence; moreover, very minute traces can be detected by the spectroscope, and though much of the lithia is probably absorbed by the soil, enough will usually work its way through if the suspected connection exists.

ICE.

A few words on the impurities in the ice so lavishly used in this country for cooling our beverages in hot weather. Cases of illness have occurred which have been traced to the use of ice in this way, though not very frequently. The commonly received impression that water in freezing not only rejects all impurities, but that any germs if frozen into it are necessarily killed, requires some correction. Water in freezing will enclose particles of organic or other matter which may be suspended in it, and almost any microscopist can testify to the persistent vitality of many of the lower forms of organisms, even after being imprisoned for a long time in blocks of ice, perhaps benumbed and dormant until released, but living. The general rule that "a pond or river which is unfit as a water supply should not be used as a source of ice supply "" is a good one, but often disregarded.

2

As regards the chemical analysis of ice, it should contain no perceptible suspended matter when melted, very little dissolved matter, or chlorine, and the albuminoid ammonia should not exceed 0.005 part per 100,000.

CONCLUSION.

In discussing the question of water supply reference has necessarily been made to certain theories which are now engaging the attention of sanitarians, and which (inasmuch as they are theories or hypotheses) have both strong supporters and vigorous opponents. Such are: The germ theory of disease; the "drinking-water theory;" the purification of rivers by flow; the generation of diseases de novo; and finally the value of certain of the chemical tests applied to water.

It must be remembered that these theories have been advanced after a careful study of numerous facts, and whether true or not as they are now stated, they cannot be regarded lightly. Future study of sanitary science may modify these views as at present held by their supporters, but it will be always desirable to keep on the safe side in selecting a location for our dwellings or deciding upon a water supply for our households, and we should not unnecessarily risk the health or lives of our families.

I Nichols, Water Supply, p. 132.

2 Ibid., p. 52.

$ Ibid., p. 54.

THE CHARACTERS AND DISTRIBUTION OF

AMERICAN SOILS.

BY N. L. BRITTON, PH.D.

THE soil is generally understood to be the upper, superficial portions of the accumulations of loosely consolidated materials, which in most regions form the surface of the earth. In this chapter it will be so considered. It is the part of the earth's crust which, directly or indirectly, supports vegetable and animal life, and is thus of immense importance to mankind. The thickness of this superficial material varies greatly in different localities; in some we find very little, or, indeed, none at all, the rocks coming directly to the surface; but such are limited in area and mostly confined to the slopes and summits of mountains; nearly everywhere there is an appreciable quantity of soil, and the accumulations are occasionally over one hundred feet deep.

To render what follows intelligible to all, it has been deemed advisable to preface this dissertation with some of the leading facts relating to the origin, structure, and constituents of soils in general.

STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION.

The soil is constituted of variously sized fragments of mineral and organic matters, and its character depends on the relative abundance of the different constituents, the dimensions of the fragments, and their greater or lesser consolidation. It is invariably permeated to some extent by water and air, and the quantity of these fluids depends on the permeability and the absorbing property of the soil, which vary greatly. The size of the component fragments is very variable, and ranges from microscopical particles, which make up the greater part of the mass, to boulders of huge proportions.

Mineralogically considered, it consists primarily of sand and clay; these constituents occur either alone or intermingled with each other in various proportions; they are often accompanied by pebbles, or even large stones of different kinds of rock, and generally by small amounts of other inorganic or organic matters. Most of the latter is derived from plants and is known as peat, humus, etc. Clay and sand are, however, the bases of all soils, and one of these minerals is always present.

ORIGIN OF SOILS.

All soils have been derived from previously existing rocks by processes of decay and disintegration acting through immensely long periods of time, and are still forming wherever rock masses are exposed to agents which produce and forward these changes. The materials resulting from

« 이전계속 »