To Limit the Jurisdiction of United States District and Circuit Courts in Certain Cases: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Sixty-Seventh Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 10212 ... March 28-June 8, 1922U.S. Government Printing Office, 1922 |
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
action affecting ambassadors appeal argument arising cents CHANDLER circuit court citizens of different city of Chicago Columbus commerce commission committee conferred confiscation confiscatory constitutional rights contracts controversy Cook County court of Cook court of equity Court of Illinois courts inferior defined denied deprive diversity of citizenship EAGLESON effect enforce essential ETTELSON existing Federal court Federal district court Federal Government fourteenth amendment furnish due process gentlemen governmental GRAHAM grant HATTON W hearing HERSEY Hunter's Lessee indorsed inferior courts injunction interstate commerce judicial department judicial power judicial system justice legislative LIMIT THE JURISDICTION litigation MICHENER Municipalities nickel car fare Ohio ordain and establish power shall extend power to destroy process of law protection provides public ministers public utilities commission questions of fact Railway remedy restraining Sangamon County statute SUMNERS Supreme Court THOM tion traction companies tribunal unconstitutional United vested violated VOLSTEAD withdraw writ YATES
인기 인용구
160 페이지 - Constitution, and the laws of the united States made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land ; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
143 페이지 - Whoever, by virtue of public position under a State Government, deprives another of property, life or liberty, without due process of law, or denies or takes away the equal protection of the laws, violates the constitutional inhibition ; and as he acts in the name and for the State, and is clothed with the State's power, his act is that of the State.
146 페이지 - Either some Caesar or Napoleon will seize the reins of government with a strong hand, or your Republic will be as fearfully plundered and laid waste by barbarians in the 20th Century as the Roman Empire was in the fifth...
146 페이지 - Your fate I believe to be certain, though it is deferred by a physical cause. As long as you have a boundless extent of fertile and unoccupied land...
140 페이지 - is the power of a court to decide and pronounce a judgment and carry it into effect between persons and parties who bring a case before it for decision.
146 페이지 - I seriously apprehend that you will in some such season of adversity as I have described, do things which will prevent prosperity from returning...
132 페이지 - The writ of injunction shall not be granted by any court of the United States to stay proceedings in any court of a state, except in cases where such injunction may be authorized by any law relating to proceedings in bankruptcy.
146 페이지 - It is quite plain that your government will never be able to restrain a distressed and discontented majority. For, with you, the majority is the government, and has the rich, who are always in the minority, absolutely at its mercy.
144 페이지 - In many states the judges are dependent for office and for salary on the will of the legislature. The constitution of the United States furnishes no security against the universal adoption of this principle. When we observe the importance which that constitution attaches to the independence of judges, we are the less inclined to suppose that it can have intended to leave these constitutional questions to tribunals where this independence may not exist, in all cases where a state shall prosecute an...
158 페이지 - ... specified instances, belongs to Congress. If Congress has given the power to this Court, we possess it. not otherwise ; and if Congress has not given the power to us, or to any other court, it still remains at the legislative disposal. Besides, Congress is not bound, and it would, perhaps, be inexpedient, to enlarge the jurisdiction of the Federal courts to every subject, in every form, which the Constitution might warrant.