 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 964 페이지
...give the benefit of the contract on the one hand to (A), and charge with liability on the other (c), the unnamed principals: and this, whether the agreement...be in writing by the Statute of Frauds : and this eridence in no way contradicts the written agreement. It does not deny that it is binding on those... | |
 | Colin Blackburn Baron Blackburn - 1845 - 374 페이지
...the contract on the one hand to, and " charge with liability on the other, the unnamed " principal, and this, whether the agreement be or be " not required...does not deny that it is binding on " those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind, but " shews that it also binds another, by reason that the " act... | |
 | William Paley - 1847 - 732 페이지
...contracting parties were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract, EO as to give the benefit of the contract on the one...the statute of frauds ; and this evidence in no way contradwts the written agreement. It does not deny that it is binding upon those whom, on the face... | |
 | 1848 - 1170 페이지
...acted as such agents in making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract on the one hand, and charge with liability, on the other, the unnamed...evidence in no way contradicts the written agreement." So it is submitted here the evidence was admissible to give the benefit of the contract to the plaintiff,... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 756 페이지
...benefit of the contract to (u), the unnamed principal, such evidence will be received ; and this, too, whether the agreement be or be not required to be in writing by the Statute of Frauds. The distinction between these two cases is, that, in the former the parol evidence would clearly contradict... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1862 - 670 페이지
...contracting parties were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract of sale, so as to give the benefit of the contract, on the...required to be in writing, by the statute of frauds. But the court mark the distinction broadly between such a case and a fa.se where an agent, who has... | |
 | Judah Philip Benjamin - 1868 - 748 페이지
...terms of tho contract suffices. Distinction between "agreement" and " bargain." Egerton r. Mathews. the benefit of the contract on the one hand to, and...does not deny that it is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind; but shows that it also binds another, by reason that the act of... | |
 | Henry Oldright - 1870 - 896 페이지
...land, but a license irrevocable to permit the plaintiff to enjoy certain privileges thereon, which was not required to be in writing by the Statute of Frauds, and consequently 1861 might be granted without deed. If the doctrine here laid RiPLEV down were uncontroverted... | |
 | Joseph Goodeve - 1871 - 914 페이지
...Parke, B. : — " There is no doubt that, where such an agreement is made, it is competent to show that one or both of the contracting parties were agents...and this evidence in no way contradicts the written (1) Doe v. Webster, 12Adolphii3 & Ellis, p. 441. (2) Lano c. Neal, 2 Starkie's Reports, p. 105. (3)... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott, Henry Bompas, Edmund Lumley - 1871 - 684 페이지
...unnamed principals" (unnamed principals there meaning principals not named in the contract itself), " and this, whether the agreement be or be not required...does not deny that it is binding on those whom on the face of it it purports to bind ; but shews that it also binds another by reason that the act of... | |
| |
There is no doubt that where such an agreement is made, it is competent to show that one or both of the contracting parties were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract on the... 
