페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

ute of; Guaranty; Indemnity; Insurance; Master and Servant, §§ 30, 36, 39, 65; Mortgages; Municipal Corporations, §§ 343–374; Parent and Child, § 9; Patents, § 195; Pleading, 88 49, 216; Principal and Surety; Receivers, § 128; Release; Sales; Specific Performance; Stipulations; Subrogation; Towns, § 38; Trade-Marks and Trade-Names, § 35; Trusts, §§ 210, 283; Vendor and Purchaser; Waters and Water Courses, § 156; Work and Labor.

I. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY. (A) Nature and Essentials in General. § 10 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract for advertising, giving the advertising company right to cancel on five days' notice, was not void for lack of mutuality.-Realty Advertising & Supply Co. v. Englebert Tyre Co., 151 N. Y. S. 885.

(B) Parties, Proposals, and Acceptance. § 24 (N.Y.Sup.) A letter in response to an application for a loan held not an acceptance of the loan or a completed contract, where it contained a number of essential details not covered by the application.-Kingsway Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 151 N. Y. S. 609.

(D) Consideration.

§ 54 (N.Y.Sup.) The release of a doubtful claim, as to which there is a dispute in good faith, is a sufficient consideration for a promise to pay money.-Reichman v. Pretzfelder, 151 N. Y. S. 898.

$75 (N.Y.Sup.) Writing of personal letters for members of assembly held a part of the duties of assembly stenographers, appointed under Legislative Law, § 7, and agreement by member of the assembly to pay therefor without_consideration.-Temple v. Brooks, 151 N.

Y. S. 490.

(E) Validity of Assent.

§ 98 (N.Y.Sup.) A party may rescind a contract for fraud and sue for the consideration paid, sue for a rescission and in that action obtain full relief, or, without rescinding, sue for damages.-Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works, 151 N. Y. S. 495.

(F) Legality of Object and of Consideration.

§ 123 (N.Y.Sup.) Contract by assembly stenographer, appointed under Legislative Law, 7, for work outside her official duty, held not against public policy.-Temple v. Brooks, 151 N. Y. S. 490.

§ 127 (N.Y.Sup.) A clause in a contract for the adjustment of all differences between the parties by arbitration is invalid. and does not bar an action on the contract.-Sutro v. H. W. Balk, Inc., 151 N. Y. S. 764.

§ 128 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Penal Law, § 570, a guaranty of the genuineness of forged indorsements, in consideration of an agreement not to prosecute the forger, is unenforceable.-Catskill Nat. Bank v. Lasher, 151 N. Y. S. 191.

II. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERA

TION.

(A) General Rules of Construction. § 143 (N.Y.Sur.) A "rule of construction" gov. erns the effect of an ascertained intention, while a "rule of interpretation" governs the ascertainment of the meaning of the maker of the instrument.-In re Union Trust Co., 151 N. Y. S. 246.

§ 152 (N.Y.Sup.) Words used in contracts are ordinarily to be interpreted in accordance with their usual meaning, and where there is no ambiguity resort to rules of construction may not be had.-Mecca Realty Co. v. Kellogg's Toasted Corn Flakes Co., 151 N. Y. S. 750. § 152 (N.Y.Sup.) A written contract must be interpreted according to its reasonably plain terms as expressed, together with such reasonable implications as the express words require. -Marshall v. Sackett & Wilhelms Co., 151 N. Y. S. 1045.

§ 155 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract will not be construed so as to lack mutuality, and thereby relieve the one who drew it from liability, if it is capable of a construction that will uphold it.-Rice v. Miner, 151 N. Y. S. 983.

§ 155 (N.Y.Sup.) The party to a contract, who drew a written agreement, is not to be favored in its construction; but it must be construed strictly against him.-Marshall v. Sackett & Wilhelms Co., 151 N. Y. S. 1045.

$169 (N.Y.Sup.) In construing written contracts it is the court's duty to place itself in the situation of the parties, and from a consideration of the circumstances, and the apparent object of the parties, to determine the intent.Mecca Realty Co. v. Kellogg's Toasted Corn Flakes Co., 151 N. Y. S. 750.

§ 176 (N.Y.Sup.) Where a written contract is unambiguous, its interpretion is for the court. -Marshall v. Sackett & Wilhelms Co., 151 N. Y. S. 1045.

(B) Parties.

§ 186 (N.Y.Sur.) Contract under seal between trustees, life tenants, and remaindermen held not enforceable as contract between remaindermen and life tenants, because infant remaindermen were not parties_thereto.-In re Bishop's Estate, 151 N. Y. S. 768.

(D) Place and Time.

§ 212 (N.Y.) A property owner, who procured a release of claims on it on agreement to pay the releasor a portion of the proceeds of the property held bound to sell within a reasonable time if having an opportunity.-Simon v. Etgen, 107 N. E. 1066, 213 N. Y. 559.

(F) Compensation.

plaintiff for designing and superintending in§ 229 (N.Y.Sup.) Provision of a contract for stallation of fixtures, that arbitrators shall fix the consideration to be paid him, if contracts for construction be not let, does not apply where they are installed, but defendants prevent him doing his work.-Zadek v. Olds, Wortman & King, 151 N. Y. S. 634.

IV. RESCISSION AND ABANDON-
MENT.

8266 (N.Y.Sup.) A party rescinding a contract for fraud and seeking to recover the consideration paid must first restore or offer to restore the thing received by him.-Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works, 151 N. Y. S. 495.

CONVERSION.

See Trover and Conversion.

CONVEYANCES.

See Assignments for Benefit of Creditors; Husband and Wife, §§ 492, 52; Mortgages; Vendor and Purchaser.

V. PERFORMANCE OR BREACH. § 303 (N.Y.Sup.) Refusal of defendants to pay for the drawing of logs under contract authorizes the plaintiff to refuse to proceed fur- See Evidence, § 185. ther with the contract and to recover for the drawing of the logs.-Sturdevant v. Mittelstaedt, 151 N. Y. S. 298.

$314 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract that plaintiff will, in consideration of a commission, do certain work for defendants, impliedly covenants that he shall have opportunity to do it, and so it is breached where they deprive him thereof.Zadek v. Olds, Wortman & King, 151 N. Y. S. 634.

§319 (N.Y.Sup.) A contractor, failing to complete the work of installing a boiler, held entitled to recover at most the difference between the reasonable cost to the owner of completing the work and the balance due under the contract. Olney & Warren v. Daniel Birdsall & Co., 151 N. Y. S. 907.

§321 (N.Y.Sup.) Defendants depriving plaintiff of opportunity to complete his contract for architectural work on commission, he may recover the value of that done, or damages for the breach.-Zadek v. Olds, Wortman & King, 151 N. Y. S. 634.

§ 322 (N.Y.Sup.) Evidence held sufficient to show that defendant was justified in terminating plaintiff's painting contract for imperfect performance.-Richman v. City of New York, 151 N. Y. S. 744.

§ 323 (N.Y.Sup.) Whether the architect's certificate delivered to the owner was a final certificate under a building contract, or only a memorandum, held under the evidence for the jury.-H. P. Sickles Co. v. McCurdy & Norwell Co., 151 N. Y. S. 906.

VI. ACTIONS FOR BREACH.

§ 324 (N.Y.Sup.) Where fraud is perpetrated in procuring the execution of a contract, party defrauded held entitled to rescind, or to continue to perform and sue for damages.-Driggs v. Hendrickson, 151 N. Y. S. 858.

$335 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Code Civ. Proc. § 533, complaint neither pleading the facts of performance by plaintiff nor that he had "duly" performed the contract sued on held defective. -Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works, 151 N. Y. S.

495.

$337 (N.Y.Sup.) Action by copartner against defendant, agreeing as attorney in fact to settle the partnership affairs according to a certain balance sheet, for breach of such agreement, held to state no cause of action.-Blumenfeld v. Cohen, 151 N. Y. S. 926.

CONTRADICTION.

See Witnesses, §§ 345-380.

COPY.

CORPORATIONS.

See Assignments, §§ 23, 137; Banks and Banking; Carriers; Counties, § 122; False Pretenses, §§ 42, 49; Fraud, § 11; Municipal Corporations; Patents, § 195; Railroads; Specific Performance, § 105; Street Railroads; Taxation, §§ 103, 122; Trade-Marks and Trade-Names, § 35.

I. INCORPORATION AND ORGAN

IZATION.

$30 (N.Y.Sup.) In litigation between persons jointly interested in organizing a number of corporations, held, that the corporate entities could not be disregarded, and their rights determined as participants in a joint venture, and not as stockholders in a corporation.-Conklin v. United Construction & Supply Co., 151 N. Y. S. 624.

IV. CAPITAL, STOCK, AND DIVI-
DENDS.

(B) Subscription to Stock.
stock of a sufficient amount not in excess of
$76 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract to subscribe for
$19,000, to provide a corporation with suffi
cient working funds and capital, is not too in-
definite for enforcement.-Sanders v. Barnaby,
151 N. Y. S. 580.

$79 (N.Y.Sup.) Where plaintiff contracted with defendant to organize a corporation, incorporators to take the stock, the defendant alone to furnish money by subscribing for $19,000 worth of stock, there was a valid contract enforceable by the corporation when formed or the plaintiff as its assignee.-Sanders v. Barnaby, 151 N. Y. S. 580.

(C) Issue of Certificates.

$99 (N.Y.Sup.) Deposit of worthless stock with corporation, as attempted justification for representations that entire capital stock was fully paid in, held not such a payment as gave one of the two stockholders an equal interest in the corporation, notwithstanding his refusal to pay for his share of the unissued stock.Conklin v. United Construction & Supply Co.,

151 N. Y. S. 624.

§ 110 (N.Y.Sup.) One of two organizers of corporation, who, when it was embarrassed, refused to take any part of unissued stock, held not entitled, after it became prosperous, to have stock taken by the other organizer canceled, in order that he might be equally interested in the corporation.-Conklin v. United Construction & Supply Co., 151 N. Y. S. 624.

For cases in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Indexes see same topic and section (§) NUMBER

VII. CORPORATE POWERS AND

LIABILITIES.

(A) Extent and Exercise of Powers in

General.

CORROBORATION.

See Witnesses, §§ 345-380.

CORRUPT PRACTICES.

§ 395 (N.Y.Sup.) A corporation cannot defeat the rights of creditors to know who its stock- See Elections, §§ 316, 329. holders are by failing to keep a stockbook.Moore v. Institute of Educational Travel, 151 N. Y. S. 929.

$396 (N.Y.Sup.) Stock Corporation Law, 8 32, is highly penal, and will be construed strictly against the judgment creditor, and recovery of the penalty will not be allowed, unless refusal to allow inspection of its stockbook was willful.-Moore v. Institute of Educational Travel, 151 N. Y. S. 929.

A corporation that had issued no certificates of stock, and which consequently had no stockbook, could not willfully refuse to exhibit such book to its judgment creditor.-Id.

The right of action for the penalty for failing to keep a stockbook is in the state.-Id.

(B) Representation of Corporation by Officers and Agents.

§ 406 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract by the president of a corporation on its behalf to furnish its employés suits of clothes held ultra vires on the

part of the officer.-Wolford v. Soter Co., 151

N. Y. S. 516.

COSTS.

See Appeal, §§ 163, 936; Attorney and Client,
§ 182; Partition, § 114.

I. NATURE, GROUNDS, AND EXTENT
OF RIGHT IN GENERAL.
§18 (N.Y.City Ct.) Under Municipal Court
Act, § 1, subd. 14, plaintiffs' suit for damages
for injury to real property held one that might
have been brought in the Municipal Court, so
that he was not entitled to costs under Code
Civ. Proc. 3228, subd. 5, despite Municipal
Court Act, § 2.-Post v. Levitan, 151 N. Y. S.

947.

§ 32 (N.Y.Sup.) Where plaintiff succeeded in establishing a material and controverted cause of action against defendant, an award of costs in his favor is proper.-Shoemaker v. Buffalo Steam Roller Co., 151 N. Y. S. 207.

Municipal Court Act, § 248, be dismissed, with § 44 (N.Y.Sup.) A complaint cannot, under § 407 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract of employment selves.-Sheeks v. Sample, 151 N. Y. S. 884. costs, where the parties settle the case themheld that of a shareholder, and not of the corporation, so that it was not liable thereon.ed and awarded to appellant were principally § 69 (N.Y.Sup.) Where the disbursements taxShankland v. Crane Oxygen Works & Ambu- for printing the record, a great part of which lance Co., 151 N. Y. S. 899. was taken up by appellant's unsuccessful attempt to show a certain fact, costs and disbursements will be directed to abide the event. Barnes v. Roosevelt, 151 N. Y. S. 322.

§ 432 (N.Y.Sup.) In corporation's action to recover proceeds of checks deposited by president in his personal account, evidence as to transactions claimed to have extinguished the corporation's claim against the president held erroneously excluded.-E. Moch Co. v. Security Bank of New York, 151 N. Y. S. 756.

(D) Contracts and Indebtedness.

§ 482 (N.Y.) Bonds secured by a trust mortgage on the stock of another corporation, though duly issued and certified by the trustee, held not entitled to participate in the proceeds at foreclosure, having been retained in the treasury of defendant, which succeeded the original mortgagor.-Trust Co. of America v. United Boxboard Co., 107 N. E. 574, 213 N. Y. 334.

(G) Crimes and Criminal Prosecutions. § 529 (N.Y.Sup.) In view of Penal Law, §§ 580, 1932, and General Construction Law, 1-37, declaring "person" to include corporations, a corporation may be convicted of conspiracy, in which specific intent is a necessary element.People v. Dunbar Contracting Co., 151 N. Y. S. 164.

XII. FOREIGN CORPORATIONS.

§ 662 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Code Civ. Proc. § 1780, subd. 4, as amended by Laws 1913, c. 60, a foreign corporation doing business in the state cannot sue another foreign corporation not doing business in the state.-United States Asphalt Refining Co. v. Comptoir National D'Escompte De Paris, 151 N. Y. S. 604.

IV. SECURITY FOR PAYMENT. $110 (N.Y.Co.Ct.) The right of a defendant to security for costs in actions in the county court by non residents, conferred by Code Civ. Proc. § 3268, subd. 1, is absolute, though it may be lost by laches.-Tedeschi v. Bacigalupo, 151 N. Y. S. 649.

$112 (N.Y.Co.Ct.) Defendant's right to demand security for costs held not waived because motion was not made until after issue was joined.-Tedeschi v. Bacigalupo, 151 N. Y. S. 649. The court may in its discretion, upon a reasonable excuse for the delay, require security for costs after defendant has served his answer. -Id.

$136 (N.Y.Sup.) The right to require plaintiff to give security for costs is waived by answer before motion for such security.-W. A. Ives Mfg. Co. v. Smith & Hemenway Co., 151 N. Y. S. 275.

VII. ON APPEAL OR ERROR, AND
ON NEW TRIAL OR MOTION
THEREFOR.

$250 (N.Y.Sup.) Where respondent moved to dismiss an appeal, though he was equally in default with appellant, appellant, filing opposing affidavits, was entitled to costs on denial of motion.-In re Fred, 151 N. Y. S. 229.

A party, required to file opposing affidavits on motion for reargument of a motion previous

ly denied, held entitled to costs on denial of their rights under the contract.-Engel v. Shusecond motion. Id.

IX. IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS. § 294 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Code Cr. Proc. § 308, the allowance to each of two counsel, appointed by the court to defend accused, charged with murder in the first degree, of $250 for successfully demurring to the indictment, held proper. -People ex rel. Van Doren v. Prendergast, 151 N. Y. S. 674.

COUNCIL.

See Municipal Corporations, § 60.

COUNTERCLAIM.

See Set-Off and Counterclaim.

COUNTIES.

See Execution, §§ 332, 448; Highways; Mandamus, §§ 73, 101.

III. PROPERTY, CONTRACTS, AND

LIABILITIES.

(B) Contracts.

§ 122 (N.Y.Suo.) Where a public service corporation, of which a county supervisor was an officer was required by the other supervisors to furnish electric current to the county, the supervisor did not violate Penal Law, § 1868, prohibiting public officials from becoming indi vidually interested in contracts.-Schenectady Illuminating Co. v. Board of Sup'rs of Schenectady County, 151 N. Y. S. 425.

Where a corporation furnished a county with electric current in accordance with Transportation Corporation Law, § 62, the county could not defeat compensation, because a member of the board of supervisors was a corporate officer.-Id.

bert Theatrical Co., 151 N. Y. S. 593.

Agreement in contract to submit in case of dispute to jurisdiction of foreign courts held not to prevent action in the courts of this state, even if valid.-Id.

§ 24 (N.Y.Sup.) Consent of the parties cannot confer on a court jurisdiction of the subject-matter of an action beyond its jurisdiction.-Herpe v. Herpe, 151 N. Y. S. 503.

§ 37 (N.Y.Sup.) Jurisdiction as to the subject-matter may be inquired into at any stage of the proceeding and is not waived by defendant's demurrer to the complaint.-Eldert v. Cross Country R. Co., 151 N. Y. S. 441.

II. ESTABLISHMENT, ORGANIZA-
TION, AND PROCEDURE IN

GENERAL.

(D) Rules of Decision, Adjudications, Opinions, and Records.

land

§ 89 (N.Y.) Earlier cases construing grants are of great weight as precedents, even though plaintiff was not a party to the action. -People v. Santa Clara Lumber Co., 107 N. E. 495, 213 N. Y. 226.

$93 (N.Y.Sup.) Prior decisions, that damages were allowable for injuries to abutting property from change of railroad grade on its own right of way incident to elimination of grade crossings, held not a rule of property.-In re Grade Crossing Com'rs of City of Buffalo, 151 N. Y. S. 146, 148.

$95 (N.Y.City Ct.) In construing a provision of the uniform Negotiable Instruments Act, decisions in other states which have adopted the act should be given the same authority as decisions in New York.-Century Bank of City of New York v. Breitbart, 151 N. Y. S. 588.

III. COURTS OF GENERAL ORIGINAL
JURISDICTION.

(B) Courts of Particular States.

§122 (N.Y.Sup.) A contract by supervisors with a corporation of which a member of the board was a stockholder and officer, being illegal under Penal Law, § 1868, was unenforceable.-risdiction of an action brought under Tax Law, § 148 (N.Y.Sup.) The Supreme Court has juSchenectady Illuminating Co. v. Board of Sup'rs 265, 266, to enforce payment of a mortgage of Schenectady County, 151 N. Y. S. 830. tax.-People v. Park Row Realty Co., 151 N. Y. S. 804.

§ 122 (N.Y.Sup.) A sale by a corporation to county supervisors was void, because a member of the board was a shareholder and officer of the corporation, regardless of whether there was a misdemeanor, within Penal Law, § 1868.-People ex rel. Schenectady Illuminating Co. v. Board of Sup'rs of Schenectady County, 151 N.

Y. S. 1012.

COURTS.

See Appeal, 88 84, 1194, 1195; Appearance; Constitutional Law, § 45; Divorce, §§ 62, 326; Judgment, § 640; Justices of the Peace; Municipal Corporations, § 408; Trial, §§ 388395.

I. NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE
OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL.
$23 (N.Y.Sup.) Provision of eontract for sub-
mission to jurisdiction of foreign courts, held
not to prevent action in this state for false
representations, whereby plaintiffs released

IV. COURTS OF LIMITED OR INFERI-
OR JURISDICTION.

§ 188 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Municipal Court Act, § 139, and Personal Property Law, § 65, held, that buyer's action to recover amounts paid, where goods are retaken under a contract of conditional sale, was not within the jurisdiction of the court.-Edelson v. Wagman, 151 N. Y. S. 40.

§ 188 (N.Y.Sup.) The Municipal Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and possesses no powers except those conferred by the statute.Junk v. Moore, 151 N. Y. S. 63.

§ 188 (N.Y.Sup.) The Municipal Court of the city of New York has no jurisdiction of an equitable action.-Herpe v. Herpe, 151 N. Y. S. 503.

8188 (N.Y.City Ct.) Under Municipal Court Act, § 1, subd. 14, plaintiffs' suit for damages

For cases in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Indexes see same topic and section (§) NUMBER

for injury to real property held one that might have been brought in the Municipal Court.Post v. Levitan, 151 N. Y. S. 947.

$189 (N.Y.Sup.) A technical conversion by one who acts in good faith and under color of title, is not a "willful injury," within Municipal Court Act, § 56, so as to render him subject to arrest.-Cohn v. Melancon, 151 N. Y. S. 39.

$189 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Municipal Court Act, a case, marked "Reserved generally," which has never been restored to the trial calendar, is not subject to a motion for dismissal.-Junk v. Moore, 151 N. Y. S. 63.

Code Civ. Proc. § 822, part of chapter 8, which by section 3347, subd. 6, is made to apply only to proceedings taken in the courts specified, of which the Municipal Court is not one, does not apply to Municipal Courts, so as to authorize the dismissal of a case marked "Reserved generally."-Id.

Code Civ. Proc. § 822, is not made applicable by a provision of the Municipal Court Act providing that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure should apply where applicable.—Id. § 189 (N.Y.Sup.) In action for rent, right of action for damages from fraud, inducing execution of the lease, held a proper counterclaim, under Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) § 151.-Driggs v. Hendrickson, 151 N. Y. S. 858.

§ 189 (N.Y.Sup.) Where summons was not signed by clerk of Municipal Court, but by another, defendant's appearance by attorney on return day, and his arrangement to have cause adjourned for trial, waived any defect in summons, and conferred jurisdiction.--Murphy v. Wilson, 151 N. Y. S. 900.

Where a cause in the Municipal Court was adjourned until a certain day, on an oral understanding that defendant should file answer before that day, no valid judgment could be entered against defendant in the interim, even if no answer was filed.-Id.

§ 189 (N.Y.Co.Ct.) In a damage suit brought in City Court, held, that plaintiff was entitled, as a matter of right, to discontinue the suit on offering to pay costs.-Connolly v. Empire United Rys. Co., 151 N. Y. S. 653.

§ 190 (N.Y.Sup.) An order of the Municipal Court, retaxing costs, is not appealable.-Realty & Commercial Co. v. Winter, 151 N. Y. S. 904.

The time for an appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court does not begin to run until judgment is completed by the entry of or refusal to enter, costs.-Id.

VIII. CONCURRENT AND CONFLICTING JURISDICTION, AND COMITY.

(B) State Courts and United States Courts. § 489 (N.Y.Sup.) Judicial Code, § 256, subd. 5, held not to preclude the state courts from passing on patents, their validity, infringement, nature, or extent, where the inquiry arises merely as incidental part of an action for libel.-Wittemann Bros. v. Wittemann Co., 151 N. Y. S. 813. COVENANTS.

See Quieting Title, § 7; Trial, § 388.

III. PERFORMANCE OR BREACH. § 96 (N.Y.Sup.) There can be no recovery for breach of a covenant against incumbrance without a showing that the grantee's purchaser took title from him subject to the incumbrance, or that a payment by the grantee removed the incumbrance.-Ostrow v. Lesser, 151 N. Y. S. 512. § 96 (N.Y.Sup.) Plaintiff, who paid off a mechanic's lien on premises conveyed to him, held not entitled to recover on the covenant against incumbrances in his deed, where the debt was one for which he was primarily liable.-Gruzenskie v. Schreyer, 151 N. Y. S. 923.

IV. ACTIONS FOR BREACH. $125 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Real Property Law, $ 253, a grantee may recover substantial damages for breach of the covenant of seisin, without proof of eviction.-Hilliker v. Rueger, 151 N. Y. S. 234.

§ 132 (N.Y.Sup.) The costs of satisfying a judgment against grantee are not recoverable

as damages for breach of covenant of seisin, but

the difference in value of the property and attorney's fees are recoverable.-Hilliker v. Rueger, 151 N. Y. S. 234.

CREDIBILITY.

$ 190 (N.Y.Sup.) Under Municipal Court Act, § 311, a defendant, not served with summons, may appeal from a default judgment in the Municipal Court.-Canelli Wine Co. v. Tassi, 151 See Witnesses, §§ 345-380. N. Y. S. 46.

On appeal from a default judgment in the Municipal Court, on the ground that no process was served on defendant, the question of service may be determined on affidavits filed in the appellate court, under Code Civ. Proc. § 3057. -Id.

$ 190 (N.Y.Sup.) Where the papers on appeal to the Appellate Term have been served and filed, but neither side notices the case for argument, the appeal could not be dismissed on respondent's motion. In re Fred, 151 N. Y. S. 229.

$ 190 (N.Y.Sup.) County court held to have properly refused to interfere with city court's determination of question of fact on conflicting evidence. Temple v. Brooks, 151 N. Y. S. 490.

CREDITORS.

See Assignments for Benefit of Creditors; Attachment; Bankruptcy.

CRIMINAL LAW.

See Bastards; Breach of the Peace; Burglary Conspiracy; Corporations, 8529; Costs, 294; Elections, §§ 316, 329; False Pretenses; Game, §9; Health, § 40; Homicide; Nuisance, §§ 59, 91, 96; Rape.

V. VENUE.

(A) Place of Bringing Prosecution. § 112 (N.Y.Sup.) The offense of obtaining money from the state by means of a false

« 이전계속 »