Darwiniana: Essays |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
24°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
20 ÆäÀÌÁö
Mr. Darwin abhors mere speculation as nature abhors a vacuum. He is as greedy
of cases and precedents as any constitutional lawyer, and all the principles he
lays down are capable of being brought to the test of observation and experiment
.
Mr. Darwin abhors mere speculation as nature abhors a vacuum. He is as greedy
of cases and precedents as any constitutional lawyer, and all the principles he
lays down are capable of being brought to the test of observation and experiment
.
34 ÆäÀÌÁö
And indeed, on general principles, this slight deviation seems as intelligible as
the general similarity, if we reflect how complex the co-operating ¡°bundles of
forces.¡± are, and how improbable it is that, in any case, their true resultant shall ...
And indeed, on general principles, this slight deviation seems as intelligible as
the general similarity, if we reflect how complex the co-operating ¡°bundles of
forces.¡± are, and how improbable it is that, in any case, their true resultant shall ...
85 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Darwinian principles would be, not that the cats have remained invariable, but
that such varieties as have incessantly occurred have been, on the whole, less
fitted to get on in the world than the existing. III CRITICISMS ON ¡°THE ORIGIN of ...
... Darwinian principles would be, not that the cats have remained invariable, but
that such varieties as have incessantly occurred have been, on the whole, less
fitted to get on in the world than the existing. III CRITICISMS ON ¡°THE ORIGIN of ...
86 ÆäÀÌÁö
... keeping before our minds, without being false to the fundamental principles of
a scientific conception of the universe. The apparently diverging teachings of the
Teleologist and of the Morphologist are reconciled by the Darwinian hypothesis.
... keeping before our minds, without being false to the fundamental principles of
a scientific conception of the universe. The apparently diverging teachings of the
Teleologist and of the Morphologist are reconciled by the Darwinian hypothesis.
104 ÆäÀÌÁö
M. Flourens has, in fact, utterly failed to comprehend the first principles of the
doctrine which he assails so rudely. His objections to details are of the old sort,
so battered and hackneyed on this side of the Channel, that not even a Quarterly
...
M. Flourens has, in fact, utterly failed to comprehend the first principles of the
doctrine which he assails so rudely. His objections to details are of the old sort,
so battered and hackneyed on this side of the Channel, that not even a Quarterly
...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
able action adapted admit animals appears authority become believe better body breed called causes changes character common complete consider course creation cross Darwin deposited direct distinct doctrine doubt effect evidence evolution existence experiments expression fact favour force forms further germ give given groups hand horse hypothesis important influence kind knowledge known laws less living matter means mind modification natural natural selection objections observation once operation opinion organic Origin of Species parent particular persons phenomena plants position possible present principles probably produced Professor prove question races reason record relations remains remarkable respect result scientific selective breeding sense similar sort structure suppose term theory thing thought tion true variation varieties vary views whole writer