페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

at ten shillings, twenty shillings, forty shillings, three pounds, four pounds, &c.; in the chancel, at twenty shillings, forty shillings, three pounds, four pounds, five pounds, yea, ten pounds: and yet the purchaser hath no assurance of it, but is constrained to hold it ad voluntatem domini, or as a tenant for seven or ten years, within which term he is oftentimes cast out, and another put into his room, and no writ of quare ejecit infra terminum lieth for him. Shall I tell what I was ashamed to hear? A grave or burying-place let to farm at twenty shillings a year, the rent being duly paid for divers years; and being then behind, the parson threatened to uncase the corpse by pulling down the monument if it were not satisfied: and shame was so far from him as he spared not to defend it even before the commissioners. Strange things to me,-what to others I know not.'

"De

If Sir Henry Spelman thought and wrote thus indignantly of the ordinary fees claimed by the church for covering up our ashes, what would he have said to a joint-stock company subscribing its twenty-five pounds a-piece as a profitable investment of capital? He would have scorned those who could seek such revolting gains; but he would have spurned at them when he saw that they pretended to cloak their sordid object with pretences of public good. clare yourselves," he would have said, an associated body of undertakers, sextons, grave-diggers, bell-ringers, coffin-makers, shroud-makers, and offer to serve the public upon such terms as may tempt them to employ you: but do not seek to make your money by the gross cheat of fine feelings and patriotic desires. Let your fellow-creatures rot as they have rotted, if you have nothing better to offer, for providing them with rotting places, than the rottenness of your own selfish ends. What care you for public health, or public decency, supposing (which is not proved) that the one is endangered and the other violated, so as you can get hold of the public money? Then doff your mask; and be content, like other traders, to attract customers for your commodities by showing that they are cheaper and better, or as cheap and as good, as those offered by your neighbours."

But the sages of the "General Ceme

tery Company" have discovered that it is a "dangerous practice" to bury in churches and churchyards. Where is their evidence? We defy them to produce any, except their own ignorant and interested assertions. London is crowded with burial-places; but London is one of the healthiest capitals in Europe. Is there one medical man, one scientific man, in the country, who will venture to affix his name to an opinion declaratory of the fact that diseases are engendered by decaying bodies underground, or deposited in vaults? Who that has walked through a churchyard thick with graves, ever perceived any thing in the air indicative of mephitic exhalations? Who that knows any thing of the quick process of decomposition, or has seen a grave opened where mouldering bones alone remain after a few years, would expect they should spread disease? And where is the proof that disease EVER HAS been communicated to the living by the buried dead?

Then as to the moral influence of churchyards being contiguous to churches. Surely, the living, when they approach the temple of the Deity to be reminded of those duties which in their performance take the sting out of the arrow of death, and rob the grave of its victory, are not the less prepared for receiving such admonitions by beholding around them the memorials of those who have already gone to their dread account? The solemnity of the churchyard is no unbefitting preparation for the solemnity of the church. It speaks to every heart; forces itself upon every mind; tells us emphatically what we are and what we must become; it is a teacher whose voice we may disregard indeed, but which we cannot refuse to hear. The practice of every age, of those ages when piety, and religion, and virtue, were something more than mere names,

by surrounding the house of prayer with the sad receptacles of mortality, proves more eloquently than a thousand pens could do, the connexion in the spirit of man between this world and the next. Our ancestors had none of that spurious sensibility which is made the pretext now for veiling from our eyes the evidences of our common lot, and converting into a country jaunt the visit to ornamental sepulchres on the sunny side of a rural hill.

Let it not be imagined from what we have said, that we are opposed to any judicious, simple, and English plan for providing adequate burial-places for our increased and increasing population. But the plain fact is, such places are sure to be provided, till the time arrives when there shall be a general taste for leaving our dead unburied; and we stand in just as much need of a general dining company, or a general sleeping company, to induce people to eat and drink, or go to bed, as a general cemetery company to encourage burying. Divested of its character as a contrivance to make money, it becomes ridiculous.

Nor is this tom-foolery less ridiculous when viewed as a piece of cockney sentimentality, for pensive publicans, tender tailors, sympathetic sempstresses, maudlin men-milliners, rural relations, and pastoral plebeians, to weep and wander amid flower-decked graves and gaudy tomb-stones. "The grounds," says the prospectus, "will be laid out and planted after the celebrated cemetery of Père-laChaise, surrounded with an ornamental inclosure, &c." and in order that the children of sensibility who have never sighed in the pathetic shades of Père-laChaise at Paris, may know how that place is" laid out and planted," a "document" is circulated with the prospectus of the General Cemetery Company, from which we extract the following touching

passages:

Here may be seen every possible device in the least applicable to so solemn a subject. On one side behold pure and unaffected simplicity courting you to read the last memorial to departed worth; whilst at no great distance, grandeur exhibited even in the tomb commands an inquiry-to whom it can belong? The tablet will, probably, unravel the mystery, and declare the author of so magnificent a work more prominent, perhaps, than the name of him whose virtues, or whose fame, it is intended to record. So,

on either side of the finely coloured gravel walk, neatness and gaudiness alternately attract the attention of the visiter. There stand the stately marble pillars, here the superb and chaste temple; the portal is open, and the stranger is tempted onwards by some beauteous flowers preserved under glasses, recured by a light iron railing, from a ruthless hand-the guardian, also, of the precious remains contained within its precincts. Tombs of marble of every hue, and tombs of stone, carved according to the skill

of the most able workmen, with sepulchral urns and vases of every shape and every fashion, are not amongst the least remarkable of the ornaments of this place.

In the midst of all this solemn splendour, are the humble and unobtruding monuments of the less wealthy. What fortune denies, nature furnishes in abundance: stately trees, with finely shadowing foliage, interspersed here and there, cover the walks from the piercing beams of the glorious sun, and serve as a canopy to the superior monuments; but the smiling flowers of the parterre, respondent to the unceasing care bestowed upon them, grow in rich luxuriance around the more humble tombs, gladdening the sight-the poor man's consolation. Some, however, an emblem both of the shortness and the casualties of life, well befitting the occasion, lie heaped together, cut from the parent plant, there to wither and to fade; yet, again, the watchful attention of friends has conveyed thither the works of the most skiful florist to make a perpetual Spring, and to render imperceptible the decay in nature; and artificial flowers in proud triumph are ingeniously placed among the tombs, interwoven with the natural foliage, so as to be taken by a casual observer as actually the

gift of the goddess Flora herself!!!

The irregularities of nature are a surprising feature in the tout ensemble of this pious design, and add peculiar beauty to the scene: laid out upon a hill of uneven surface, sundry minor elevations, as well as lower grounds, have afforded the artist the greatest possible field for embellishment, and given scope for the most admirable arrangement !!

Perhaps, in some

secluded spot a devout husand, a pious wife, or children urged by filial love and affection, may be adding to the interest of the whole, whilst perceived, yet scarcely seen, in fervent prayer, they are, according to the principles of their faith, making intercession for some dear friend, who has already entered into "the valley of the shadow of death," and with solemn looks, "each speaking in his heart, only his lips moving, but his voice heard not," they breathe forth an ardent expectation that their supplications are not in vain. Through the thick foliage of the trees, and the high-raised Cenotaphs, may now and then be seen a figure pressing forward in some well-known path, with perturbed looks and downcast eyes, wishing to elude observation. Who can view this daughter of affliction and weep not, or feel at least some rising sympathy?

Is not this a beautiful picture? Is it not just worthy of a people, whom Voltaire described-(and let the events of the first revolution declare how truly)

as a compound of the "monkey and the tiger?" Is it not precisely what we might expect from a people who, during that revolution, committed in cold blood, the most disgusting, the most execrable, the most hideous and revolting outrages upon the grave, upon the dead, upon every affection, feeling, and principle which dignify or endear the ties of social and domestic life?

But what have Englishmen, what have Englishwomen, to do with such mummeries? Our matrons, our wives, our daughters, our sisters, mourn for those of whom they are bereaved, not after this fantastical fashion. They want no finely-coloured gravel walks, no flowers preserved under glasses, no artificial ones, no decorated graves, to bespeak their sorrow. They are not mourners in public, to show a well-turned elbow, while they hold the cambric handkerchief to eyes, "unsullied with a tear." Their grief is the grief of nature; and nature in her tribulation seeks solitude and the deep retirement of silent thought. We do not dress our face in wo at stated intervals, and bend over the sepulchre of those we loved, in a studied attitude of theatrical despair. It is alien to our nation; foreign to our character. We are as far removed from all this coxcombry, this dandyism of feigned affliction, as we are from the shrugs, and grimaces, the kissings and

huggings, of the half-monkeys, half-tigers, by whom they are practised. An honest John Bull would only laugh at the knavish fool whom he saw blubbering and groaning over a grave stuck with daffadowndillies, in the English Pèrela-Chaise, between pastoral Paddington and the rural road to Harrow.

We will not now descend into the particulars of the scheme of the "GeneralCemetery Company." When we see reason to believe that there are fifty persons of ordinary common sense seriously engaged in promoting it, then they shall hear from us again. Meanwhile, we shall content ourselves with finally observing, that in whatever light it is viewed, it is equally open to ridicule and reproach. To reproach, as an odious speculation for making money under false and hollow pretences of public good, though the public are really no more interested in the design than they would be in a project for removing the catacombs of Egypt to the top of Primrose Hill: and to ridicule, as a piece of un-English foppery, well suited to the capacity of the projector, but incapable of being engrafted upon the plain, manly, and sober qualities of the English character, in all things abhorrent of frippery, and in nothing more so than in what concerns the best affections of the human heart.

G.

THE SILENT MEMBER'S LETTERS TO THE KING.

We recur to these bold productions of a confirmed "Church and Monarchy" man, for we have received a third edition of the First, and a second edition of the Second Letter.

It would be superfluous to enter again upon the merits of these pamphlets, after the opinions we have already recorded; but as a proof that the author has his eye upon passing events, and is alive to what he considers the dangerous measures which are engendered in sheer ignorance, and supported by popular clamour, we need only give the preface to the last edition.

It is the language of an experienced politician, the warning of one who looks beyond the present moment, the advice of a man, be he whom he may, accustomed to calculate on the consequences of innovation; and whether he be regarded by those who can alone arrest the progress of the mischief, or despised as an alarmist, few who read will deny that his arguments are yet unanswered, while many will pronounce them unanswerable.

MOTTO.

"May every man who has a stake in the country, whether from situation, from character, from wealth, from his family, and from the hopes of his children-may every man who has a seuse of the blessings for which he is indebted to the form of Government under which he lives, see that the time is come at which his decision must be taken, and, when once taken, steadfastly acted upon-for or against the institutions of the British Monarchy! The time is come at which there is but that line of demarcation."-Canning's Speech at Liverpool in 1820.

PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION OF SECOND LETTER.

Eight years were required to bring Charles I. to the scaffold. Let a reformed House of Commons have eight years to work with; and if the year 1840 do not exhibit to the world the British Monarchy, the Established Church, and the British Empire, in a condi. tion lamentably changed from what they now are, human nature itself must be changed, and human passions, vices, motives, and desires, must cease to be what they have been in all ages of the world.

At no period of our history, since that great and glorious epoch when the Barons demanded the GREAT CHARTER from an imbecile King, have the Peers of England been called to such a task as now awaits them. THEY AND THEY ALONE CAN SAVE THE COUNTRY. There is, there can be, no hope from a House of Commons elected (DELEGATED it might be said), specially for the purpose of giving the effect of law to a measure which thousands of their fellow subjects believe to be subversive of our ancient institutions.

WILL the Peers of England do their duty? This is a question upon every tongue. It is the question alike of those who fear, and those who pray, they will have firmness enough to grapple with the danger at once.

Heretofore they have stood as a barrier between the "mad multitude" and the throne; as a stronghold of defence, beating back the turbulent waves of democracy; but thanks to the men by whom we are now governed, this is no longer their position. If they do their duty, they must endure to be told, by those who have brought us into so fearful a jeopardy, that they are not the King's friends-for, the King is himself a reformer!There is a startling novelty in this, sufficient to paralyse the actions of men not prepared to look steadily at a great crisis, and having taken the dimensions of the peril that is before them, sternly to summon their energies for a struggle with it. But a calmer examination will shew its fallacy. The friends of the Monarchy cannot be the enemies of the Monarch; the friends of the Country cannot be the enemies of the Monarch; the friends of the Constitution cannot be the enemies of the Monarch; the friends of the Church cannot be the enemies of the Monarch; the friends of those civil and religious institutions which have made England what she is, cannot be the enemies of a King of England.

Here then is the ground marked out, from which they may hurl back with scorn the base calumny which it will be attempted to fasten on them. Let their proud answer be this "We stand for the Monarchy; we stand for the Country; we stand for the Constitution; we stand for the Church; we stand for those Civil and Religious Institutions which have made our country what it is, and before God we declare our solemn conviction that they are all in danger. You may tell us we are no friends to our King. We say, seeking the preservation of the things we do, we are his best friends. You may tell us, the King is a reformer. We answer, in the language of our birthright, We are the King's Counsellors, bound to advise him with fearless honesty, when he is ill-advised. We are not here to register his will against the clearest dictates of our judgment. We have a duty paramount to our loyalty (if the time be indeed come, when loyalty to the throne means only submission to a rash, innovating, and incapable ministry)—a duty to our country, a duty to our children, a duty to ourselves, in the intrepid discharge of high functions transmitted to us by our fathers; and if, through your pernicious measures, we cannot perform this duty without being arrayed against our Sovereign, rather be it so, than that the fear of what may follow should deter us from doing that which can alone arrest what must follow."

Would to God we could feel assured this will be the language of the House of Peers! It would bring the question to a short and decisive issue. A storm might ensue, and probably would; but it would be a mere summer gathering of the clouds, compared with that tempest which is preparing for us, the extent of whose ravages no one can foretel, Admit there is danger in coming to an open conflict with a radical House of Commons- is there no danger in crouching to its menaces ? Away with the traitorous timidity! Go forth, and meet it at once, instead of waiting till it comes howling to your doors. Crush the infant Hercules! It will be wiser than standing by its cradle to watch its growth, and preparing to wrestle with it, when, in the fulness of time, its brawny strength dilates to gigantic proportions, beneath which you will be crushed yourselves.

We know that among many persons such sentiments are unpopular, and we think it possible that the publicity which we give them among the highest class of females, may offend the friends of reform; but let them point out to us any "address to the Sovereign" which argues as powerfully in behalf of the sweeping measure in question, and they will find us equally ready to do justice to the writer, and give the cause which he supports all the benefit of our circulation.

"GEMS" FROM JEREMY TAYLOR.*

WE have, on more than one occasion, expressed our sentiments upon the character, genius, and writings of Jeremy Taylor, anxious to excite in our readers a taste for his masculine thoughts, clothed in the rich garb of a lofty and exuberant imagination. It would be superfluous to repeat those sentiments; but in aid of them, and in furtherance of our desire, we shall, from time to time, as the volumes of Mr. Valpy's Divines of the Church of England appear, devote a few pages of the Royal Lady's Magazine to such extracts from his works as must create in those who have any pretensions to taste or judgment themselves, an absolute longing to possess the volume whence they are taken. We do not know how we can better act up to our profession, that of "raising the female mind of England to its true level," or better promote the interests of an undertaking which has our warmest approbation; and we shall only add, that we could not feel flattered by the approbation of any of our readers, who could pass over, as uninviting, the specimens we propose to lay before them from one of the master spirits of the olden time.

FALLACIOUS DENOTEMENTS OF HAPPINESS.

"But if we should look under the skirt of the prosperous and prevailing tyrant, we should find, even in the days of his joys, such alloys and abatements of his pleasure, as may serve to represent him presently miserable, besides his final infelicities. For I have seen a young and healthful person warm, and ruddy under a poor and thin garment, when, at the same time, an old rich person hath been cold and paralytic under a load of sables and the skins of foxes. It is the body that makes the clothes warm, not the clothes the body; and the spirit of a man makes felicity and content, not any spoils of a rich fortune wrapped about a sickly and an uneasy soul."

THE SPIRITUAL FRUITS OF ADVERSITY.

"Do not trouble yourself by thinking how much you are afflicted, but consider how much you make of it; for reflex acts on the suffering itself can lead to nothing but to pride, or to impatience, to temptation, or apostacy. He that measures the grains and scruples of his persecution, will soon sit down and call for ease, or for a reward; will think the time long, or his burden great; will be apt to complain of his condition, or set a greater value on his person. Look not back on him that strikes thee, but upward to God that supports thee, and forward to the crown that is set before thee; and then consider if the loss of thy estate hath taught thee to despise the world; whether thy poor fortune hath made thee poor in spirit; and if thy uneasy prison sets thy soul at liberty, and knocks off the fetters of a worse captivity. For then, the rod of suffering turns into crowns and sceptres, when every suffering is a precept, and every change of condition produces a holy resolution, and the state of sorrows makes the resolution actual and habitual, permanent and persevering. For, as the silk-worm eateth itself out of a seed to become a little worm, and there feeding on the leaves of mulberries it grows till its coat be off, and then works itself into a house of silk; then casting its pearly seeds for the young to breed, it leaveth its silk for man, and dieth all white and winged in the shape of a flying creature; so is the progress of souls. When they are regenerate by baptism, and have cast off their first stains, and the skin of worldly vanities, by feeding on the leaves of scripture, and the fruits of the vine, and the joys of the sacrament, they encircle themselves in the rich garments of holy and virtuous habits; then, by leaving their blood, which is the church's seed, to raise up a new generation to God, they leave a blessed memory and fair example, and are themselves turned into angels, whose felicity is to do the will of God, as their employment was in this world to suffer it."

THE DUTY OF CONSCLING THE AFFLICTED.

"And certain it is, that as nothing can better do it, so there is nothing greater for which God made our tongues, next to reciting his praises, than to minister

From the second volume of his works, forming No. XIV. of the Divines of the Church of England.

« 이전계속 »