페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

Interstate Business Men's Acci.
Asso., Riley v. ... (Iowa)
Ireland v. Linn County Bank (Kan.)

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

293 317

K.

Kansas, Missouri P. R. Co. v. (U. S.) 1589 Kaw Construction Co., Dolman

V.

(Kan.)

67

Kelly Constr. Co. v. Hackensack Brick Co. ..(N. J.) 685 Kendrick State Bank v. Bar

[ocr errors]

57 184

Lacy, Johnston County v.
Lang v. Wilmer
Laskowski v. People's Ice Co.

num

Kidd, Cruse v.
Knight, Ludlow Sav. Bank & T.
Co. v.
Knights & Ladies of Security
v. Glenn
. (Fla.) 1503
Knox County, Barlin v. ..(Tenn.) 112
Kommel & Son v. Champlain

....

Transportation Co. (Vt.) 275

(Idaho) 1129 (Ala.) 36 (Vt.) 1433

(N. C.) 726 . (Md.) 1698

Lavin v. Lynch ..... ..(Mich.) 804 Lawrence University v. Outagamie County ... (Wis.) 465 Lester, Frantz v. (W. Va.) 1558 Lewis, Flynn v. (Mass.) 896 Linn County Bank, Ireland v.

...

(Kan.) 184

(Mich.) 586

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Stuart-Howland Co. v.

Martin, Watkins Medical Co. v.

...

(Vt.) 1433 (Mich.) 804 (Ga.) 1475

(Ark.) 1230 ..(Iowa) 814 Mayfield, Union Nat. Bank v.

Maxwell, Baker v.

[ocr errors]

(Mass.) 678

Merithew v. Ellis
Middlesex County, Buckelew v.

.......

(Mass.) 678

718

(N. J.) . (Neb.)

840

Miles, Falloon v. Miller v. Maier . (Minn.) 399 Missouri P. R. Co. v. Kansas (U. S.) 1589 Mitchell-Henry V. Norwich Union L. Ins. Soc. (Eng. C. A.) 1644 Mize, Presbyterian Church v. (Ky.) 1237 Modern Woodmen of America,

Logan v. (Minn.) 1676 Moorman v. Campbell County (V...) 177 Moran, State ex rel. Frances

[ocr errors][merged small]

(Okla.) 135 . (Me.) 1429

......

V.

Moreau River State Bank v. Japinga (S. D.) Mundt, Sioux Falls Lodge No. 262 v. .. (S. D.) Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Doering . (Okla.) Myers, Stevens v.

(Fla.) 1068

[ocr errors]

National Bank of Commerce, State Exchange Bank v.

504

542

94 (Or.) 1155

...(Okla.) 211

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

... ...

Sanderson v. Turner (Okla.) Scarlett, State v. (N. J.) Schroyer v. Thompson (Pa.) 1567 Schwenn v. Schwenn (Wis.) 281 Seaver v. Ransom .(N. Y.) 1187 Selma Savings Bank v. Farmers' Nat. Bank .... (Ky.) 1136 v. Webster County Pank

.....

57

847 83

(Ky.) 1136 ........(N. J.) 122 . (Cal.) 1493

(Me.) 327

Shaw v. Beaumont Co.
Sheldon v. James
Sidelinker v. York Shore Wa-
ter Co.
Sioux Falls Lodge, No. 262 v.
Mundt
Smith v. Hill
Texas Bank & T. Cɔ. v.
(Tex.) 771
Spanell v. State (Tex. Crim. App.) 593
Spokane, Taylor v..... ...(Wash.) 1046
Spring Valley, McDonald v. (Ill.) 1359

(S. D.) 542 (Mass.) 1667

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

...

พ.

.....

Walker v. Sundermeyer (Mo.) 1005
Walsh v. State ex rel. Cook .. (Ala.) 551
Warm, State v.
(Vt.) 811
Warner v. Flack
(Ill.) 423
Washington Union Coal Co. v.
Thurston County

(Wash.) 1546 Watkins Medical Co. v. Martin

(Ark.) 1230 (Ark.) 1230

v. Nettle Webster County Bank, Selma Savings Bank v. .. (Ky.) 1136 Welch Lumber Co. v. Carter Bros. West, Coombs v. .. White & Co., People ex rel. Stuckart v. ... White Auto Co. v. Collins Whitla, Gray v. Wilmer, Lang v. Woodilee. Coal & Coke Co. v.

. (Md.) 1698

M'Neill (Eng. H. L.) 1637 Wragg v. Griffin Wunsewich v. Olson

(Iowa) 1327 . (Minn.) 560

...

....

Zeeb v. Bahnmaier

Z.

(W. Va.) 1583 (Me.) 1424

Y. York Shore Water Co., Sidelinker v.

(Ill.) 1052 .(Ark.) 1594 .(Okla.) 356

[ocr errors]

..(Me.) 327

. (Kan.) 883

AMERICAN
LAW REPORTS

ANNOTATED

RE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK RELATIVE TO ACQUIRING TITLE TO THE PARKWAY IN THE BOROUGH OF THE BRONX.

JAMES A. WOOLF et al., Appts.

MADELINE PIERCE, Respt.

New York Court of Appeals — October 28, 1913.

(209 N. Y. 344, 103 N. E. 508.)

Boundaries-property abutting on highway.

1. Where a conveyance is of property abutting on a public highway, or where the descriptive lines run to or along such highway, the presumption is of an intent on the part of the grantor to convey title to the center of the highway; which presumption, however, must yield to language showing a contrary intent.

[See note on this question beginning on page 6.]

Same effect of description.

2. The presumption of an intent on the part of a grantor of land abutting on a highway to convey title up to the center of the highway is rebutted by a description of the premises conveyed which bounds them beginning at the

northwesterly corner of W. street and S. avenue, thence running westerly along said street 50 feet, thence north parallel with the avenue 100 feet, thence easterly parallel with the street 50 feet, thence southerly along the avenue 100 feet to the place of beginning.

APPEAL by petitioners from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department, affirming an order of a Special Term for New York County, Part I., directing distribution of an award to respondent in proceedings to acquire title to land required for street improvements. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion Mr. James R. Deering, with Mr. James A. Deering, for appellants James A. Woolf et al.:

The deed from Thomas O. Woolf, 2 A.L.R.-1.

of the court.

Joseph A. Woolf, and John A. Woolf to Claus Young, dated July 19, 1855, did not include any part of the land within the boundaries of Walnut street

« 이전계속 »