Fur Seal Arbitration: In the Matter of the Claims of Great Britain Against the United States of America Before the Bering Sea Claims Commission. Argument for the United States in ReplyU.S. Government Printing Office, 1897 - 496ÆäÀÌÁö |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
3 ÆäÀÌÁö
... August , 1886 , and information respecting the same was received by the United States Secretary of State on the 18th of the same month , and a request was made for particulars by the British Government on the 27th of September , no ...
... August , 1886 , and information respecting the same was received by the United States Secretary of State on the 18th of the same month , and a request was made for particulars by the British Government on the 27th of September , no ...
4 ÆäÀÌÁö
... August 18 , 1886 , wrote to the British ¡¤ ambassador on November 12 , 1886 , that he had not received it , and that he withheld the information , already weeks and months in his possession , after he had received the notes of inquiry ...
... August 18 , 1886 , wrote to the British ¡¤ ambassador on November 12 , 1886 , that he had not received it , and that he withheld the information , already weeks and months in his possession , after he had received the notes of inquiry ...
9 ÆäÀÌÁö
... August 13 , 1887 , corrected the misunderstanding , if there was one , and made this statement in that letter , which is fully justified by an examination of the correspondence ( Rec . , 81 ) : I can discover no ground whatever for the ...
... August 13 , 1887 , corrected the misunderstanding , if there was one , and made this statement in that letter , which is fully justified by an examination of the correspondence ( Rec . , 81 ) : I can discover no ground whatever for the ...
95 ÆäÀÌÁö
... August 19 , 1872- but ten days before the first formal ruling against prospective profits -- the arbitrators requested the counsel for the United States to present tables of the claims of the United States , and then in those tables ...
... August 19 , 1872- but ten days before the first formal ruling against prospective profits -- the arbitrators requested the counsel for the United States to present tables of the claims of the United States , and then in those tables ...
173 ÆäÀÌÁö
... August , 1889 , he made an affi- davit at Victoria , relating to the claim for the seizure of the Triumph on the 11th day of July , 1889 , by the United States revenue cutter in Bering Sea . That I am master and part owner of the ...
... August , 1889 , he made an affi- davit at Victoria , relating to the claim for the seizure of the Triumph on the 11th day of July , 1889 , by the United States revenue cutter in Bering Sea . That I am master and part owner of the ...
¸ñÂ÷
1 | |
12 | |
18 | |
19 | |
40 | |
148 | |
155 | |
177 | |
375 | |
382 | |
388 | |
395 | |
402 | |
408 | |
414 | |
423 | |
209 | |
228 | |
247 | |
258 | |
265 | |
319 | |
337 | |
357 | |
364 | |
437 | |
447 | |
457 | |
466 | |
477 | |
484 | |
490 | |
497 | |
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
25th of August affidavit Alexander Frank Alexander McLean Alfred Adams allegiance amount Anna Beck appears Argument on behalf award Bechtel Bering Sea bill of sale Black Diamond boat Britain British argument British subject canoes Captain Warren Carolena catch Charles Spring cited claim claimants Commissioners Convention cost court crew cross-examination damages Daniel McLean Dolphin domicile evidence examination fact Government High Commission hunters hunting Indians international law Jacob Gutman July jurisdiction line 50 loss Majesty's Majesty's Government Mary Ellen master Morris Moss nation owner Pathfinder port Pribilof Pribilof Islands question reason Record referred registered Richard Rush rule San Francisco schedule schooner seal hunting seal skins sealing grounds sealing season sealing vessels seized seizure September ship Sitka sold statement testified testimony Thornton tion tons treaty Treaty of Washington Unalaska Victoria voyage W. P. Sayward weather William Munsie witness
Àαâ Àο뱸
51 ÆäÀÌÁö - The inhabitants of the two countries, respectively, shall have liberty freely and securely to come with their ships and cargoes to all such places, ports, and rivers, in the territories aforesaid, to which other foreigners are permitted to come...
23 ÆäÀÌÁö - When parties have deliberately put their engagements into writing in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking, was reduced to writing...
168 ÆäÀÌÁö - Alabama claims. And whereas Her Britannic Majesty has authorized her High Commissioners and Plenipotentiaries to express in a friendly spirit the regret felt by Her Majesty's Government for the escape, under whatever circumstances, of the Alabama and other vessels from British ports, and for the depredations committed by those vessels.
28 ÆäÀÌÁö - The high contracting parties agree that all claims on the part of corporations, companies, or private individuals, citizens of the United States...
31 ÆäÀÌÁö - The commissioners, so named, shall meet at London at the earliest convenient period after they shall have been respectively named; and shall, before proceeding to any business, make and subscribe a solemn declaration that they will impartially and carefully examine and decide, to the best of their judgment, and according to justice and equity...
94 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... satisfactory provision for the future, agrees, that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules. And the High Contracting Parties agree to observe these rules as between themselves in future, and to bring them to the knowledge of other maritime Powers, and to invite them to accede to them.
167 ÆäÀÌÁö - Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
28 ÆäÀÌÁö - Companies, or private individuals, subjects of Her Britannic Majesty, upon the Government of the United States, arising out of acts committed against the persons or property of subjects of Her Britannic Majesty...
100 ÆäÀÌÁö - And whereas the Government of Her Britannic Majesty cannot justify itself for a failure in due diligence on the plea of the insufficiency of the legal means of action which it possessed: Four of the Arbitrators for the reasons above assigned, and the fifth for reasons separately assigned by him, Are of opinion — That Great Britain has in this case failed, by omission, to fulfil the duties prescribed in the first and the third of the Rules established by the Vlth Article of the Treaty of Washington....
167 ÆäÀÌÁö - Her Majesty's Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees, that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules.