 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1889 - 936 페이지
...to present to the jury the law contained in sections 2972 and 3034 of the code of 1882, as follows: "If the plaintiff, by ordinary care, could have avoided...defendant's negligence, he is not entitled to recover. No person shall recover damage from a railroad company for injury to himself or his property, where... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1878 - 708 페이지
...verdict was contrary to law, contrary to the evidence, and because the court erred in charging the jury that " if the plaintiff, by ordinary care, could have...consequences to himself caused by the defendant's negligence (if the evidence shows negligence on the part of the defendant), the plaintiff will not be entitled... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1886 - 990 페이지
...ordinary care (and I have given the definition of ordinary care and diligence), if William H. Meigs, by ordinary care, could have avoided the consequences to himself caused by the defendant's negligence, she is not entitled to recover." (17.) That the court erred in adding to his charge, as The Western... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1888 - 946 페이지
...set forth in section 2972 of the Code, to-wit: If the plaintiff (in this case plaintiff's husband) by ordinary care could have avoided the consequences...to himself, caused by the defendant's negligence, she is not entitled to recover. The point was decided at this term in the case of Harris vs. The Central... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1885 - 952 페이지
...solely by his own negligence; and failed to charge the jury as requested by defendant's counsel, " that if the plaintiff, by ordinary care, could have avoided the consequences to himself by the defendant's negligence, he was not entitled to recover." For the failure to give this principle... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1883 - 926 페이지
...property, and thereby omitted and ignored the important ground of defence relied upon in this case, that " If the plaintiff by ordinary care could have avoided the consequences to himself by the defendant's negligence, he is not entitled to recover." Code, 2972. We are of opinion this complaint... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1869 - 812 페이지
...but if he neglected to use such ordinary '•are to escape the injury, he is not entitled to recover. If the plaintiff, by ordinary care, could have avoided...to himself, caused by the defendant's negligence, hi is not entitled to recover. No person shall recover damages from a railroad company for injury to... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1875 - 776 페이지
...plaintiff, by ordinary care, such as by keeping his dams in repair and his drains clear and fit for use, could have avoided the consequences to himself, caused...defendant's negligence, he is not entitled to recover," and in giving the charge with this qualification : "If in the ordinary tillage or proper administration... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1878 - 706 페이지
...verdict was contrary to law, contrary to the evidence, and because the court erred in charging the jury that " if the plaintiff, by ordinary care, could have...consequences to himself caused by the defendant's negligence (if the evidence shows negligence on the part of the defendant), the plaintiff will not be entitled... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1879 - 762 페이지
...himself or his property where the same is done by his consent, or is caused by his own negligence. b. "If the plaintiff, by ordinary care, could have avoided...defendant's negligence, he is not entitled to recover. ': "A carrier of passengers is bound also to extraordinary diligence on behalf of himself and his agents,... | |
| |
If the plaintiff by ordinary care could have avoided the consequences to himself caused by the defendant's negligence, he is not entitled to recover. 
