The company would certainly have no ground of complaint if it were allowed a value for these lands equal to the fair average market value of similar land in the vicinity, without additions by the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical... Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota - 497 페이지저자: North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan, Edwin James Taylor - 1914전체보기 - 도서 정보
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1931 - 966 페이지
...the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for conjectural cost of acquisition and consequential...contingencies," and " Interest during construction." Here there is precisely the same basis for a like conclusion and not one of the circumstances to which... | |
| Washington (State) - 1913 - 1312 페이지
...without additions by the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for a conjectural cost of acquisition and..."contingencies" and "interest during construction." A rule laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States is the law of the land, and we therefore... | |
| American Telephone and Telegraph Company. Bureau of Commission Research. Legal Dept - 1913 - 1518 페이지
...without additions by the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for a conjectural cost of acquisition and...'contingencies' and 'interest during construction.' " In applying this decision to proceedings such as the present one, the distinction between ascertaining... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1913 - 686 페이지
...without additions by the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for a conjectural cost of acquisition and...contingencies" and "interest during construction." By reason of the nature of the estimates, and the points « Opinion of the Court. 230 U. 8. to which... | |
| California Public Utilities Commission, Railroad Commission of the State of California - 1915 - 964 페이지
...without additions by the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for a conjectural cost of acquisition and...'legal expenses,' 'contingencies' and 'interest during construction.1" In my opinion the reasoning of the court is altogether sound. It is, of course, impossible... | |
| William Zebina Ripley - 1913 - 890 페이지
...the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for conjectural cost of acquisition and consequential...contingencies," and " interest during construction." By reason of the nature of the estimates, and the points to which the testimony was addressed, the... | |
| California Public Utilities Commission, Railroad Commission of the State of California - 1918 - 1164 페이지
...outlays. The allowances made below for a conjectural cast of acquisition and consequential damages niuist be disapproved : and in this view we also think it...'contingencies' and 'interest during construction'." Thus the court fixes the maximum to be allowed for real estate and certainly the canal company will... | |
| William Zebina Ripley - 1913 - 886 페이지
...outlays. The allowances made below for conjectural cost of acquisition and consequential damages must l>e disapproved ; and, in this view, we also think it...contingencies," and " interest during construction." By reason of the nature of tlije estimates, and the points to which the testimony was addressed, the... | |
| Railroad Commission of the State of California - 1914 - 1048 페이지
...the use of multipliers, or otherwise, to cover hypothetical outlays. The allowances made below for conjectural cost of acquisition and consequential...to add to the amount taken as the present value of lands the further sums, calculated on that value, which were embraced in the items of 'engineering,... | |
| 1914 - 1242 페이지
...excerpt applies particularly to plaintiff's offered proof of valuation of Its North Dakota propertles, shown by Soo Exhibit 36: "The allowance made below...during construction.' " Exhibit 36 contains about four millions in Items for englneerng, superintendence, legal expenses, contingencies, and interest during... | |
| |