331

REPORTS

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF INDIANA,

WITH TABLES OF THE CASES REPORTED AND CASES
CITED AND STATUTES CITED AND CONSTRUED
AND AN INDEX.

By SIDNEY R. MOON,

OFFICIAL Reporter.

DANIEL W. CROCKETT, First Asst. Reporter.
LEE W. MOON, Second Asst. Reporter.

VOL. 140.

CONTAINING CASES DECIDED AT THE NOVEMBER TERM, 1894, AND NOT
PUBLISHED IN VOLUME 139

INDIANAPOLIS:

CARLON & HOLLENBECK, CONTRACTORS FOR THE STATE.

44

TABLE OF THE
THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Alexander v. Alexander...555, 560 | Clark, Admr., Glessner, Admr., Allen et al., Indiana Racing

.442
..572
.533 Durbin et al. v. Redman et al..694

Harris, Surviving Partner, Ha-
vens and Geddes Co. v.........387
Hatfield et al. v. Cummings,
Rec.

Havens and Geddes Co. v. Har

547

ris, Surviving Partner.........387 Henry et al., Brunson et ux. v..455 Hoosier Stone Co., Thomas v...518 Hoss et al. v. Hoss et al.... Hudkins, Kennedy v......... Hutchins v. State........

.551

.570
78

Indiana, Illinois and Iowa R.
W. Co. v. Snyder, Admr......647
Indiana Racing Assn. v. Allen
et al...

Indianapolis Car and Mfg. Co.
et al., Voorhees v..
Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.,
McGahan V.......

437

Southern R. W. Co. v. Mc-
Intosh, Admr.

Lawrence et al. v. Van Buskirk

LeCoil v. Armstrong-Laudon-
Hunt Co.....

Louisville, Evansville and St.
Louis Consolidated R. R. Co.
v. Miller, Admx......

..685

88

Mattox v. Stevens et al...........282
May v. State........
Matchett, Senour, Treas., v.....636
McCorkle, Terre Haute and

..335

.261

.386

Indianapolis R. R. Co. v......613
McCormack v. Sweeney...........680
McGahan v. Indianapolis Nat-
ural Gas Co.......
McIntosh, Admr., Lake Shore
and Michigan Southern R.W.
Co. v...
McIvor, Dallin v...
McKinney v. Frankfort and
State Line R. R. Co. et al...... 95
Medical College of Indiana et
al. v. Commingore et al........296
Mexico Pub. Co. et al., Gum-
Elastic Roofing Co. v...........158
....174
Miller v. Miller..

Admx., Louisville,
Evansville and St. Louis Con-

Miller,

.220

solidated R. R. Co. v..

685

..335

Miller, State v......

.168

Mitchell v. Brawley.

.216

Jackson v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St.Louis R. W. Co......

Mitchell et ux., Woodward et

.241

al. v........
Moore v. Slack et al..
Morgan et al., Boos v...

406

38

..........206

.544

.688

Jameson, Walker et al. v........591
Jenkins v. Wilson......
Jenners, Spraker v......
Jennings et al. v. Sturdevant...641
Johnson v. Board of Commis-
sioners of Randolph Co.........152
Johnson v. Eberhart, Sheriff...210
Johnson et al., Wall Street

Methodist Episcopal Church

Obenchain, Parker et al. v......211 .445 Ohio and Mississippi R. W. Co. 289 v. Stein...

61

Kennedy v. Hudkins...

Kitts v. Willson et al.....
Krathwohl et al. v. Dawson,
Guar.

.481

Van Buskirk et al., Lawrence
et al. v.....
Van Meter, Chase et al. v........321

and Mfg. Co...........

School Corporation of the Town
of Russelville v. Russelville
Lodge, No. 141, of Free and
Accepted Masons.......422 Voorhees v. Indianapolis Car
Senhenn v. City of Evansville..675
Senour, Treas., v. Matchett.....636
Senour, Treas., v. Ruth.......
Skaggs v. City of Martinsville..476
Slack et al., Moore v..
Smith et al. v. State ex rel.
Hamill, Pros. Atty........340, 343
Smith v. Wood....

.318

38

.351

Snyder, Admr., Indiana, Illi-
nois and Iowa R. W. Co. v...647
Spencer et al., Robbins v..
Spraker v. Jenners.....

Wagner et al.v.Citizens' B'lding,

.220

Loan and Sav. Assn........ .700
Walker et al. v. Jameson...... ..591
Wall Street Methodist Episco-

pal Church v. Johnson et al..445
Wallace et al., Goss et al. v.....541
Walls et al. v. State, ex rel.
Mallott, Aud. of Lawrence
Co., et al...

16

.483

.688

Whetstone et al. v. Baker et al..213

State v. Arnold et al..

.628 Wilson v. Carrico.....

.533