Connecticut Reports: Containing Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Errors, 63±Ç |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
77°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
8 ÆäÀÌÁö
They did not make the filling continuous , but left a space unfilled into which the tide . has ever since caused the water to flow . They owned the land next north of the causeway built as an approach to the Grand Avenue bridge .
They did not make the filling continuous , but left a space unfilled into which the tide . has ever since caused the water to flow . They owned the land next north of the causeway built as an approach to the Grand Avenue bridge .
13 ÆäÀÌÁö
... pulleys over which they pass , and other causes , it frequently becomes necessary for the workmen to enter the run . ... that the superintendent or person in charge of the foot of the run shall at such times cause the engine to be ...
... pulleys over which they pass , and other causes , it frequently becomes necessary for the workmen to enter the run . ... that the superintendent or person in charge of the foot of the run shall at such times cause the engine to be ...
14 ÆäÀÌÁö
Bishop saw the plaintiff in the run , but he neglected to notify the engineer or to cause him to be notified of the fact , and the engineer had no knowledge that a man was in the run or that it was not safe to start the engine on the ...
Bishop saw the plaintiff in the run , but he neglected to notify the engineer or to cause him to be notified of the fact , and the engineer had no knowledge that a man was in the run or that it was not safe to start the engine on the ...
17 ÆäÀÌÁö
... defendant had a rule that the superintendent or person in charge at the foot of the run should at such times cause the engine to be stopped and the engineer to be notified ; and that after such notice the engineer should not VOL .
... defendant had a rule that the superintendent or person in charge at the foot of the run should at such times cause the engine to be stopped and the engineer to be notified ; and that after such notice the engineer should not VOL .
20 ÆäÀÌÁö
The court furthermore did not believe that the presence of said White in court was neces sary to a fair trial of the cause . The court was further of the opinion that the interests of justice required that the trial should proceed .
The court furthermore did not believe that the presence of said White in court was neces sary to a fair trial of the cause . The court was further of the opinion that the interests of justice required that the trial should proceed .
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action agreement alleged allowed amount ANDREWS appeal applied assessed assignment authority Bank borough brought Bunnell & Scranton called carried cause charge circumstances claim complaint Conn consideration considered construction contract County damages death defendant determine direct duty effect entitled error evidence execution exercise existence facts finding follows further give given granted ground Hartford Haven held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury land liable matter meaning nature necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion paid parties payment performance person plaintiff police practice present probate proof proper prove purchase question reason received recover reference refused relation rendered request rule securities shares statute sufficient suit Superior Court taken tion tort town trial trustee witness York
Àαâ Àο뱸
580 ÆäÀÌÁö - The judicial power of the State shall be vested in a Supreme Court of Errors, a Superior Court, and such inferior courts as the General Assembly shall, from time to time, ordain and establish; the powers and jurisdiction of which courts shall be defined by law.
51 ÆäÀÌÁö - They are in every instance the sole judges of the facts, and, when called as grand jurors, they are the judges of the law as well as of the facts.
416 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... in actions by or against the representatives of deceased persons, the entries, memoranda and declarations of the deceased relevant to the matter in issue may be received in evidence.
299 ÆäÀÌÁö - There Is error; the Judgment of the superior court Is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law. All concur. (78 Conn. 7) MARCH v. BRICKLAYERS' & PLASTERERS
160 ÆäÀÌÁö - For all acts done by a servant In obedience to the express orders or directions of the master, or in the execution of the master's business, within the scope of his employment, and for acts In any sense warranted by the express or implied authority conferred upon him, considering the nature of the services required, the Instructions given, and the circumstances under which the act Is done, the master is responsible...
166 ÆäÀÌÁö - In the execution of the master's business all the time, and this is enough without so finding in terms. This court will not review such a finding upon the errors assigned. If, however, we should hold the question raised upon this point to be one of law, we have no hesitation In saying that the court below reached the correct conclusion on the facts found. In either point of view, then, there is no error. The remaining question relates to the allowance of the amendment The complaint alleged that the...
184 ÆäÀÌÁö - Nothing contained in this section shall be so construed as to prevent the use of cleats or other retaining means for the purpose of preventing shifting of containers or batteries.
169 ÆäÀÌÁö - I nshort, a physician or surgeon is bound to bestow such reasonable and ordinary care, skill and diligence as physicians and surgeons in the same neighborhood, in the same general line of practice, ordinarily have and exercise in like cases.
163 ÆäÀÌÁö - I am very far from saying, if the servant when going on his master's business took a somewhat longer road, that owing to this deviation he would cease to be in the employment of the master, so as to divest the latter of all liability ; in such cases it is a question of degree as to how far the deviation could be considered a separate journey.
162 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... law, determine that the servant was still executing his master's business. So, too, where the deviation is very marked and unusual, the court in like manner may determine that the servant was not on the master's business at all, but on his own. Cases falling between these extremes will be regarded as Involving merely a question of fact, to be left to the Jury or other trier of such questions.