Connecticut Reports: Containing Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Errors, 63±Ç |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
80°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
viii ÆäÀÌÁö
Evans , East Windsor ( Town of ) , O'Neil v . Evans , Dexter v . • Falken v . Housatonic Railroad Co. , Fiske , State v . Flint , State v .. Force v . Gregory , Fritts v . New York and New England Railroad Co. , Gardner v .
Evans , East Windsor ( Town of ) , O'Neil v . Evans , Dexter v . • Falken v . Housatonic Railroad Co. , Fiske , State v . Flint , State v .. Force v . Gregory , Fritts v . New York and New England Railroad Co. , Gardner v .
ix ÆäÀÌÁö
Town of East Windsor , Peck v . Pierce , Peck , Sanford v . Perkins Electric Lamp Co. , Thill's Sons & Co. v . Phelps , Neely v . Philadelphia , Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad Co. , Rowland v .
Town of East Windsor , Peck v . Pierce , Peck , Sanford v . Perkins Electric Lamp Co. , Thill's Sons & Co. v . Phelps , Neely v . Philadelphia , Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad Co. , Rowland v .
x ÆäÀÌÁö
Ritchie v . Waller , Robinson's Appeal from Commissioners , .. Ross v . Webster , Rowland v . Philadelphia , Wilmington & Baltimore Rail- road Co. , . Rules of Practice , Ryan v . Town of Bristol , Sanford v . Peck , Shannahan v .
Ritchie v . Waller , Robinson's Appeal from Commissioners , .. Ross v . Webster , Rowland v . Philadelphia , Wilmington & Baltimore Rail- road Co. , . Rules of Practice , Ryan v . Town of Bristol , Sanford v . Peck , Shannahan v .
xi ÆäÀÌÁö
Westport ( Town of ) , Greenwood v . White v . Town of Portland , Winton et al . , Tolles v . Wood v . Wood , . Woodruff , Allen v . Woodruff v . Marsh , ¡¤ • ¡¤ • Page 420 64 588 18 440 324 369 125 Vol 54 , p .
Westport ( Town of ) , Greenwood v . White v . Town of Portland , Winton et al . , Tolles v . Wood v . Wood , . Woodruff , Allen v . Woodruff v . Marsh , ¡¤ • ¡¤ • Page 420 64 588 18 440 324 369 125 Vol 54 , p .
2 ÆäÀÌÁö
A town sewer flows into it . Upon these facts it is a water - course , subject to the usual law of water - courses . The main body of water flows in different directions , but , during substantially all the time , it is flowing in one ...
A town sewer flows into it . Upon these facts it is a water - course , subject to the usual law of water - courses . The main body of water flows in different directions , but , during substantially all the time , it is flowing in one ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
action agreement alleged allowed amount ANDREWS appeal applied assessed assignment authority Bank borough brought Bunnell & Scranton called carried cause charge circumstances claim complaint Conn consideration considered construction contract County damages death defendant determine direct duty effect entitled error evidence execution exercise existence facts finding follows further give given granted ground Hartford Haven held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury land liable matter meaning nature necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion paid parties payment performance person plaintiff police practice present probate proof proper prove purchase question reason received recover reference refused relation rendered request rule securities shares statute sufficient suit Superior Court taken tion tort town trial trustee witness York
Àαâ Àο뱸
580 ÆäÀÌÁö - The judicial power of the State shall be vested in a Supreme Court of Errors, a Superior Court, and such inferior courts as the General Assembly shall, from time to time, ordain and establish; the powers and jurisdiction of which courts shall be defined by law.
51 ÆäÀÌÁö - They are in every instance the sole judges of the facts, and, when called as grand jurors, they are the judges of the law as well as of the facts.
416 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... in actions by or against the representatives of deceased persons, the entries, memoranda and declarations of the deceased relevant to the matter in issue may be received in evidence.
299 ÆäÀÌÁö - There Is error; the Judgment of the superior court Is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law. All concur. (78 Conn. 7) MARCH v. BRICKLAYERS' & PLASTERERS
160 ÆäÀÌÁö - For all acts done by a servant In obedience to the express orders or directions of the master, or in the execution of the master's business, within the scope of his employment, and for acts In any sense warranted by the express or implied authority conferred upon him, considering the nature of the services required, the Instructions given, and the circumstances under which the act Is done, the master is responsible...
166 ÆäÀÌÁö - In the execution of the master's business all the time, and this is enough without so finding in terms. This court will not review such a finding upon the errors assigned. If, however, we should hold the question raised upon this point to be one of law, we have no hesitation In saying that the court below reached the correct conclusion on the facts found. In either point of view, then, there is no error. The remaining question relates to the allowance of the amendment The complaint alleged that the...
184 ÆäÀÌÁö - Nothing contained in this section shall be so construed as to prevent the use of cleats or other retaining means for the purpose of preventing shifting of containers or batteries.
169 ÆäÀÌÁö - I nshort, a physician or surgeon is bound to bestow such reasonable and ordinary care, skill and diligence as physicians and surgeons in the same neighborhood, in the same general line of practice, ordinarily have and exercise in like cases.
163 ÆäÀÌÁö - I am very far from saying, if the servant when going on his master's business took a somewhat longer road, that owing to this deviation he would cease to be in the employment of the master, so as to divest the latter of all liability ; in such cases it is a question of degree as to how far the deviation could be considered a separate journey.
162 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... law, determine that the servant was still executing his master's business. So, too, where the deviation is very marked and unusual, the court in like manner may determine that the servant was not on the master's business at all, but on his own. Cases falling between these extremes will be regarded as Involving merely a question of fact, to be left to the Jury or other trier of such questions.