Reorganization Plans Nos. 2, 3, and 4, 1952: Hearings... 82-2 |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
ÆäÀÌÁö
And , of course , they are weeded out as fast as that fact is established . I was
speaking more particularly with reference to the criticism that is often heaped
upon the postal service , of politics in it ; and most of that criticism is based upon
the fact ...
And , of course , they are weeded out as fast as that fact is established . I was
speaking more particularly with reference to the criticism that is often heaped
upon the postal service , of politics in it ; and most of that criticism is based upon
the fact ...
ÆäÀÌÁö
Of course , the allocation of grades will be made hy the Civil Service Commission
. The CHAIRMAN . That does not necessarily mean that the 20 new positions
being created would be an additional personnel expense ? Mr . GRAHAM .
Of course , the allocation of grades will be made hy the Civil Service Commission
. The CHAIRMAN . That does not necessarily mean that the 20 new positions
being created would be an additional personnel expense ? Mr . GRAHAM .
ÆäÀÌÁö
Of course , I am assuming that the party that is now in power is in power while we
are working through this hypothetical case . In other words , I am assuming that
this hypothetical case will develop at least some time between now and next ...
Of course , I am assuming that the party that is now in power is in power while we
are working through this hypothetical case . In other words , I am assuming that
this hypothetical case will develop at least some time between now and next ...
ÆäÀÌÁö
Of course not . Senator DWORSHAK . Of course not ? Then where is your
argument ? If it is nonpolitical , but you still have two Commissioners belonging to
the majority party , you can sit there and tell me that they disregard politics in their
...
Of course not . Senator DWORSHAK . Of course not ? Then where is your
argument ? If it is nonpolitical , but you still have two Commissioners belonging to
the majority party , you can sit there and tell me that they disregard politics in their
...
ÆäÀÌÁö
Thus , if they voted for one plan which removed Senate confirmation , why , of
course , they are bound now to follow that precedent even though they were
wrong in the first place . Mr . COATES . I would not want to transcribe it that way ...
Thus , if they voted for one plan which removed Senate confirmation , why , of
course , they are bound now to follow that precedent even though they were
wrong in the first place . Mr . COATES . I would not want to transcribe it that way ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
abolished abolition accomplished accounting action administration agency ANDRETTA application appointment appraiser assistant Attorney authority basis believe bill branch Bureau Bureau of Customs career CHAIRMAN Civil Service Commission collector committee Comptroller confirmation Congress consideration consult continue course Court customs district duties effect eligible eliminate employees established examination executive existing fact FLEMMING follows functions give going Government GRAHAM hearings Hoover House important increase internal LAWTON legislation letter marshals matter ment merit method objective operations opinion organization party person political position Post Office Department postal Postmaster General DONALDSON present President President's procedures proposed question reason recommendations record reference remove Reorganization Act Reorganization Plan representatives respect responsibility result Secretary selection Senator DWORSHAK Senator SCHOEPPEL serve statement statute submitted term thing tion transfer Treasury United United States marshals
Àαâ Àο뱸
5 ÆäÀÌÁö - That no recommendation of any person who shall apply for office or place under the provisions of this act which may be given by any Senator or member of the House of Representatives, except as to the character or residence of the applicant, shall be received or considered by any person concerned in making any examination or appointment under this act.