Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session, July 12, 2000U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000 - 130ÆäÀÌÁö |
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
2d Cir Adam's Mark Alan Schneider allegations Amended Petition Attorney Bill Lann Lee Board of Education CANADY CANDACE CARRABUS Chairman charter schools City School District Civil Rights Division claim cognitive CONG CONGRE CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Consent Decree Consent Order dissolving County Board County defendants County of Suffolk County School District Court United Date of Last Department of Justice desegregation discrimination dissolving regulatory injunc district court Education DJ employment examination Federal filed Georgia GRES hate crimes imposing permanent injunction Independent School District July July 18 Last Litigation-Related Activity law enforcement Lee and United LIBRARY OF CONGRESS litigation Macon ment N.D. Ala Nassau County Nature of Litigation-Related Order approving Order dissolving regulatory petitioners plaintiffs Police Department Police Exam police officer racial RARY Report response Ridley S.D. Miss School District DJ score selection device status conference subcommittee Suffolk County Code Suffolk County Police tion and imposing Title VII violations WATT York
Àαâ Àο뱸
101 ÆäÀÌÁö - It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
91 ÆäÀÌÁö - Nothing in this title shall be deemed to exempt or relieve any person from any liability, duty, penalty, or punishment provided by any present or future law of any State or political subdivision of a State, other than any such law which purports to require or permit the doing of any act which would be an unlawful employment practice under this title.
97 ÆäÀÌÁö - In appraising the sufficiency of a complaint we follow, of course, the accepted rule that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.
67 ÆäÀÌÁö - A party seeking a preliminary injunction generally must establish "(a) irreparable harm and (b) either (1) likelihood of success on the merits, or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary relief.
71 ÆäÀÌÁö - Such examinations shall be practical in their character, and so far as may be shall relate to those matters which will fairly test the relative capacity and fitness of the persons examined to discharge the duties of the service into which they seek to be appointed.
75 ÆäÀÌÁö - The affidavit of verification must be to the effect, that the pleading is true to the knowledge of the deponent, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true.
88 ÆäÀÌÁö - We first consider the breach of contract claim, bearing in mind that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.
71 ÆäÀÌÁö - Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive...
109 ÆäÀÌÁö - Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 US 412, 421, 98 S.Ct. 694, 700, 54 L.Ed.2d 648 (1978) ("[A] district court may in its discretion award attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant in a Title VII case upon a finding that the plaintiffs action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, even though not brought in subjective bad faith.").
100 ÆäÀÌÁö - Disproportionate impact is not irrelevant, but it is not the sole touchstone of an invidious racial discrimination forbidden by the Constitution.