1143 Squire, Sanders & Dempsey and W. C. Boyle, | Ricketts and S. H. Bright, for plaintiffs in erfor defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SUMMERS, C. J., and CREW and SHAUCK, JJ., concur. ror. John C. Pettit, for defendant in error. (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 5, 1909.) Error WHITEHEAD et al. v. COX. (No. 11,078.) to Circuit Court, Lorain County. Stetson Ingersoll, & Wilcox, for plaintiffs in error. Stroup & Fauver and Thompson, Glitsch & Cinniger, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. CREW, C. J., and SPEAR and SHAUCK, JJ., concur. WITHROW v. STATE ex rel. MARVIN. No. 11.821.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 23, 1909.) Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County. William Worthington and F. F. Dinsmore, for plaintiff in error. Burch & Johnson and Thorndyke, Fredericks & Capelle, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, for reasons stated in the opinion of the circuit court. SUMMERS, DAVIS, SHAUCK, and PRICE, JJ., concur. WRIGHT v. STATE, on Complaint of SIMPSON. (No. 11,422.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Dec. 21, 1909.) ing County. Kibler & Montgomery, for plainError to Circuit Court, Licktiff in error. Messrs. Smythe & Smythe, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. CREW. C. J., and SUMMERS, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur. WRIGHT V. TRIMMER. (Supreme Court of Ohio. Oct. 12, 1909.) Error (No. 11,147.) Wright, for plaintiff in error. to Circuit Court, Hocking County. O. W. H. defendant in error. S. Weldy, for PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SUMMERS, DAVIS, and PRICE, JJ., con cur. WYER et al. v. VAN HORN. (No. 11.205.) (Supreme Court of Ohio. Nov. 9, 1909.) Error to Circuit Court, Hancock County. Blackford & Blackford, for plaintiffs in error. (SuDoty and J. A. & E. V. Bope, for defendant in error. WHEELING & L. E. R. CO. v. TOLEDO RY. & TERMINAL CO. (No. 8.565.) preme Court of Ohio. Jan. 25, 1910.) Error to Circuit Court. Lucas County. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Seiders & Monnette, and Smith & Beckwith, for plaintiff in error. Hamilton & Kirby, and Brown, Geddes, SchmetKing & Tracy, tau & Williams, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. SUMMERS, C. J., and CREW, SPEAR, DAVIS, SHAUCK, and PRICE, JJ., concur. John N. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. VIS, and PRICE, JJ., concur. CREW, C. J.. and SUMMERS, SPEAR, DA became a party to these proceedings, and was thereupon entitled to prosecute the same, even though the original petitioner, failed to establish his claim. The motion for reargument should be denied, but the remittitur should be amended so as to affirm the order of the Appellate Division in so far as it reverses the decree of the surrogate as to the claim of John T. Pirie, with costs against him in all courts. But as to the claim of Frederick A. Wright, as administrator of Susan Wright, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decree of the surrogate affirmed, with costs to him in this court and in the Appellate Division. CULLEN, C. J., and VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, and CHASE, JJ., concur. Motion denied. END OF CASES IN VOL. 91. |