...incurred by such extra expenses and delay." But the defendant offering no such proof, the true rule of damages was held to be, the difference between the value of the wheat in Pittsburgh, with the freight added, and the market price at Philadelphia, at the time...

...of transportation.4 In another case, where a railroad failed to deliver flour at a day agreed upon, the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the contract price of the flour on that day and the price actually realized.6 § 16. The defendant contracted...

...any longer subsisting. Therefore where in such a case the defendant sold the goods to a third party, the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the contract price, and the price at which they were sold (h). And in a similar case, where the plaintiff...

...of transportation.3 In another case, where a railroad failed to deliver flour at a day agreed upon, the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the contract price of the flour on that day and the price actually realized.4 § 16. The defendant contracted...

...consequence of a failure to deliver a message ordering a certain quantity of goods, a loss to the plain tiff occurred through a rise in their value, the measure...direct conformity with that in Squire's Case, supra. In Graham'» Саве, 1 Col. 230 (1871), the telegraph company neglected to deliver a message directing...

...seven per cent from date of sale. Pitsinowsky v. Beardsley, Hill & Co., 37 Iowa, 9. 70. In another case the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the actual value of the machine, and what its value would have been if it had been as warranted. McCormick...

...part of the plaintiff. In Drewv. Beal, 62 111. 164, which was for deceit as to quality on an exchange, the measure of damages was held to be " the difference between the actual value of the land and the value of such a piece of land as this was represented to be" (p. 168);...

...Рас. 273), the contract as extended gave the seller until January 15th to deliver the wheat, and the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the contract price and the market price at the place of delivery on January 15th. The time of shipment...

...LRA 474, 19 Am. St. Rep. 55. Where the message sent and negligently delayed was, "Ship hogs at once," the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the market value of the hogs on the day the plaintiff was able to put them In market after receiving the...

...until the following February when ho bought in at a considerable advance on the contract price, and the measure of damages was held to be the difference between the contract and the February prices («)• In Brotm v. Mutter (r), in 1872, is a leading case on the...