China and the Major Powers in East AsiaBrookings Institution Press, 2001. 9. 19. - 432페이지 The foreign policy of the People's Republic of China has been dominated in recent decades by the problems of dealing with the other major powers in East Asia. Although many ideological, political, and economic aims have shaped particular Chinese policies, Peking's dominant concern has been national security. Since the late 1960s, its leaders have viewed the Soviet Union as the primary threat to China and have pursued a distinctive, Maoist, balance-of-power strategy against it. China's post-Mao leaders continue to give priority to strategic considerations and the problems of relations with the other major powers. It cannot be assumed, however, that they will simply continue past policies. The recent changes both within China and in the broad pattern of international relations in East Asia have created a new situation. In this study, A. Doak Barnett analyzes in detail China's bilateral relations with the Soviet Union, Japan, and the United States. He also examines the changing nature of the four-power relationship in East Asia. On this basis, he discusses possible future trends in Chinese policy and the prospects for achieving a more stable regional equilibrium. |
도서 본문에서
65개의 결과 중 1 - 5개
... struggle , on the one hand to revolutionize their own society and create a strong modern state , and on the other to define China's relationship with the international com- munity as a whole . One continuing goal has been to achieve the ...
... struggle against all forms of imperialism and colonial- ism , which they now define so broadly as to include virtually all influ- ences exerted by large powers over smaller ones . China's leaders are determined to redress past wrongs ...
... struggle demanded alignments across ideological lines , appealed for a broad united front of Communists and noncommunists against the fascists . After they achieved power in 1949 , however , they stressed the basic dichotomy between all ...
... struggle in the world was between revolutionaries and imperialism , but now its definition of imperialist enemies included the Soviet " social im- perialists " as well as the U.S. " imperialists , " and its definition of potential ...
죄송합니다. 이 페이지의 내용은 보실 수 없습니다..
목차
China and the Soviet Union | 10 |
Historical Legacy | 11 |
SinoSoviet Alliance | 13 |
SinoSoviet Conflict | 20 |
Ideological and National Differences | 40 |
The Period Ahead | 66 |
China and Japan | 72 |
Historical and Cultural Links | 73 |
SinoAmerican Detente | 171 |
Problems of Normalization | 188 |
Economic Relations | 202 |
Strategic and Security Factors | 205 |
Korea and the Indochina States | 209 |
The Longrun Future of Taiwan | 212 |
Prospects for the Relationship | 226 |
China and the New FourPower Equilibrium | 229 |
Early Communist Policy | 77 |
A New Context | 89 |
Domestic Political Factors | 105 |
Economic Relations | 109 |
Japan China and Southeast Asia | 112 |
Japan China and Northeast Asia | 117 |
Security Issues | 127 |
China and the United States | 133 |
Historical Legacy | 134 |
Early Communist Attitudes | 142 |
Two Decades of Confrontation | 156 |
The Major Shifts in Chinese Alignments | 234 |
Political Economic and Military Trends | 238 |
A New Pattern of MajorPower Relations | 264 |
Retrospect and Prospect | 295 |
Sources | 299 |
ChinaA New Major Power | 300 |
China and the Soviet Union | 304 |
China and the New FourPower Equilibrium | 344 |
Index of Authors Cited | 353 |