페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

Page |

::.... 642

[ocr errors]

........ 710

.

.................

........ 701
.......1138
....... 34

[ocr errors]

38

..1096

[ocr errors]

...........1128

Pago San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R. Co. v. Long State v. Board of Com’rs of Guadalupe Beach (Cal.)....

204 County (N. M.) .. Sapulpa co. v. Kimball & Reading (Oki.).: 935 State, Board of Com’rs of Laramie County Saratoga State Bank, Campbell v., two v. (Wyo.),.... cases (Wyo.).........:::

........... 801 State v. Board of Com’rs of Reno County

::::::..... Sauve v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. of

(Kan.)

861 Scranton, Pa. (Idaho)....

112 State v. Botkin (Kan.)....

................1119 S. Birch & Sons Const. Co., Glenn v. State v. Brewer (Utah)..................1094 (Mont.) ...........

State v. Bridwell (Utah)... Schaeffer, Sponsel v. (Colo.). .........

State v. Butler (Mont.)...

.......1198 Scheeline v. Moshier, two cases (Cal.)..... State, Carson v. (Okl. Cr. App.)......... 639 Schlegel & Co., Banca Commerciale Itali State v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors, etc. ana Di Genova v. (Cal. App.).......... 231! (Wash.) .....::::.........

972 Schmitt v. White (Cal.)...

216 State v. Cluff (Utah) ...... School Dist. No. 1 of Corvallis. Ravalli State v. Davis (Okl.)............. County, Hauf v. (Mont.)....

315 State v. Deming (Kan.)..... Schorman v. McIntyre (Wash.)...

| State, Diamond Drug Co. v. (Okl.)...... 907 Schrock, State 1. (Wash.)....

1005 State v. District Court, two cases (Mont.)..1198 Schubach v. Redelsheimer (Wash.)... 739 State v. District Court of Tenth Judicial Schuber v. McDuffee (Okl.).......

895 Dist, in and for Fergus County (Mont.). .1018 Schulz, Olson v. (Wash.)...............

90 State v. District Court of Tenth Judicial Schuster v. Sutherland (Wash.)...... 730 | Dist. in and for Fergus County (Mont.)..1020 Scott, Indian Land & Trust Co. v. (Okl.). . 1164 State v, Duane (Kan.).......... Scott, Malone v. (Okl.). ....

606 State, Draughn v. (Okl. Cr. App.)........ 890 Scott, Robinson v. (Or.).....

268 | State v. Eden (Wash.). .................. 967 Scott, Smiley v. (Okl.)... 919 State v. Fong Loon (Idaho)....

233 Sealy v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. (Kan.).. 62 | State, Gransden v. (Okl. Cr. App.).. 1.57 Selby v. Lindstrom (Okl.).....

State v. Harcombe (Utah)............. Seneca Co. v. Doss (Okl.) .. 575 | State v. Howard (Wash.)..

101 Sengstacken, Foulkes v. (Or.)...

952 State, Jackson v. (Okl. Cr. App.)... 292 Service & Wright Lumber Co. v. Sumpter State, Johns v. (Ariz.)...

136 Valley R. Co. (Or.)....... .......... 175 State v. Johnson (Okl.).......

.1129 Serwe, `State v. (Wash.)... ...... 81 State v. Kellogg (Wash.)...

341 Severy State Bank v. Grags (Kan.)....... 41 State v. Kenney (Kan.)......

25 Sewell, Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

State v. Kimble (Kan.)....... (Okl.) ......::::.... .1142 State, Levy v. (Okl. Cr. App.)..

288 Shaffer v. Tyrrell (Okl.) ..

626 State, Maddox v. (Okl. Cr. App.).... 883 Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. New State, Marshall v. (Okl.).....

...1166 come (Okl.)...... .1193 State v. Mohler (Kan.)......

.. 408 Shelton, Webb v. (Okl.)....

State v. Montana Power Co. (Mont.).....1198 Shepard, Doty v. (Kan.)......

| State, Norris v. (Okl. Cr. App.)......... 639 Shippen v. Shippen, two cases (Wash.).... 247 | State, Oklahoma Gin Co. v. (Okl.). ....... 629 Sigler v. Sigler (Kan.)....

864 | State v. Olympia Light & Power Co. Simpson Logging Co. v. Chehalis County

(Wash.) ..... (Wash.) .........

State v. Pino (N. M.). Skeen vi District Court of Fifth Judicial

State, Pitman v. (Okl.)........

..1137 Dist. in and for Bannock County (Ida State v. Pratt (Wash.)......

981 ....1072 State, Ramirez V. (Ariz.)...

640 Skelley, North Healdton Oil & Gas Co. v.

State, Ratcliff v. (Okl. Cr. App.)... 293 .....1180 State v. Raynolds (N. M.)....

413 Slocum, Harpold v. (Cal. App.). ......... .1051 State v. Roberts (Wash.).....

101 Smartt Board of Com’rs of Craig County State v. Rocky Mountain Elevator v. (Okl.)..... 601 (Mont.) ............................

818 Smiley v. Scott (Okl.).. .... 919 | State, Rogers v. (Okl. Cr. App.). .........

637 Smith, Ex parte (Okl. Cr. App.).. 304 State, Roller V. (Ariz.).................

451 Smith, Hooper v. (Cal. App.)....

| State, Salazar V. (Ariz.)...............

136 Smith v. Leahy (Okl.).....

361

State v. Schrock (Wash.).......... .1005 Smith v. Reis (Cal. App.). ....

1052
State v. Serwe (Wash.)......

81 Smith v. Stanfield (Idaho)... Snohomish County, First Nat. Bank v.

State, Spreckels v. (Cal. App.). .... 549 92

State (Wash.)

v. Steen

499

(Idaho)...... Southern California Edison Co., Haviland State, Stutsman v. (Okl.)..

.1132 v. (Cal.)......................:::::.

328

State, Thurman y. (Okl. Cr. App.).. Southern Pac. Co., Dickinson v. (Cal.)... 183

State v. Tillman (Mont.). Southern Pac. Co., People v. (Cal.)...... 177

State v, Ward (Mont.)..

1198 Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Pillsbury

State v. West (Mont.)...

1198 (Cal.) ...

State v. Whitworth (Kan.)......

........ Southwest Nat. Bank of Kansas City, Mo.,

State, Wiley v. (Ariz.).....

135 v. Lindsley (Idaho)......

State v. Wingard (Wash.)........

725 Sponsel v. Schaeffer (Colo.) ...

290 715

State, Wright v. (Okl. Cr, App.).. Spores v. Maude (Or.)..

109

State Board of Control v. Buckstegge Spradling v. Spradling (Okl.)......

900
(Ariz.) .....

837 Spreckels v. Spreckels (Cal.) ..

537

State Board of Land Com’rs, Gibson v. Spreckels v. Spreckels (Cal.) ...

(Mont.) .......

...1198 Spreckels v. Spreckels, three cases (Cal.). . 542 State Board of Medical Examiners v. JorSpreckels v. Spreckels, two cases (Cal.).. 543 dan (Wash.)....... Spreckels v. State (Cal. App.) ...

State Industrial Acc. Commission, WestSpriggs, Whitehead v. (Okl.)......

439 ern Indemnity Co. v. (Cal.)...........1033 Stack v. Gudgel (Okl.).....

..1144 State Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City, DarStafford, Priestley v. (Cal. App.)... 776 nell v. (Okl.)........

921 Stantield, Smith v. (Idaho)..

239 Stearns-Roger' Mfg. Co. v. Jackson Lake Staples v. Astoria (Or.)........

Reservoir & Irrigation Co. (Colo.).. Starkey, Lusk v. (Okl.).... ......... 918 Steele, Myers v. (Kan.). ................ 0

660 State, Bell v. (Okl. Cr. App.)... 402 | Steen, State v. (Idaho)..................

499

85 131

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.....

[ocr errors]

..1124 .1198

I

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

N

i

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.......... 863

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Page 1

Page Stertz v. Industrial Ins. Commission of Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. Richards (Okl.)......1187 Washington (Wash.).....

256 Union Pac. R. Co, v. Public Utilities ComStevens v. Inch (Kan.)....

43 mission (Kan.).... Sterer, Gunness v. (Okl.)................

568 Utter, Woodward v. (Idaho)............. 492 Stevinson, Inc., San Joaquin & Kings River

Canal & Irrigation Co. v. (Cal. App.)... Vance, Mettler v. (Cal. App.)......
Stone, City State Bank of Oklahoma City Van Cott v. Frank (Cal. App.)...
7. (Okl.).....

. 11168
Vansickle v. Hazeltine (Idaho).

326 Stone, Ellis v. (N. M.)....

480
Vaughan y. Fifer (Wash.)......

93 Stonebaker v. Ault (Okl.) .............. 570

Vermillion, People v. (Cal. App.)..
Stonemetz v. Gallagher (Okl.)..

385
Vernor v. Poorman (Okl.) .....

615 Strachan v. Drake (Colo.)..

310

Victurino, Annesley v. (Cal. App.)...... 507 Straban, Citizens' State Bank of I

Vigil, Ortega v. (N. M.)....

487 son v. (Okl.).....

378 | Viss v. Calligan (Wash.) ................1012 Strauss . Mowry (Cal. App.).... 341 Sturdavent, Hess v. (Okl.)....

9051 Siurdirant v. Pillsbury (Cal.).....

Wade v. Empire Dist. Electric Co. (Kan.). 28 Sturterant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Wade v. Empire Dist. Electric Co. (Kan.)..1110 of Maryland (Wash.)........

Wagnied, Larson v. (Mont.). ............1198
Wahl v. Crosby (Ariz.)..................

432 Stutsman v. State (Okl.).. Sumpter Valley R. Co., Service & Wright Waldock_v. Atkins (Okl.) ..

587 Lumber Co. v. (Or.)..

175

Walker Dry Goods Co.' v. Blake (Okl.)... 381 Superior Court in and for Butte County,

Waller, Blossom v. (Cal. App.)........... 509

Walsh, Ahlgren v. (Cal.)................ Peterson v. (Cal. App.).... 547

.. 748 Superior Court of Merced County, East

Walters, Johnson v. (Okl.)............... 914 Side Canal & Irrigation Co. v. (Cal.

Ward, State v. (Mont.).................1198
Ward, Tiger v. (Okl.)........:::::

.. 941 App.) ......

...... Supreme Council Catholic Knights of

Ward & Obenchain, Clarke v. (Or.)....... 277 America, Linneweber v. (Cal. App.).... 229

Watkins, Dorsett v. (Okl.)....

Waugh, People v. (Cal. App.).......... Sutherland, Schuster V. (Wash.)... 730

.. 336 Webb v. Shelton (Okl.)....

..1128 Swanson v. Peel (Okl.) .. Shardan v. Ellis (Okl.).............

Webber & Co., Armstrong v. (Wash.)..... 957
Weekly, Jeffreys v. (Or.).................

Wehe, Failor v. (Kan.)....
Taggert, Ex parte (Okl. Cr. App.)........ Weigar v. Steen (Or.).....

280 Tamm, Post v. (Wash.).

91 | Welda State Bank, Benjamin v. (Kan.). Tarin v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.

Wells, Morrow v. (Cal. App.)...... 226 (Kan.) .....

874 Werline v. Aldred (Okl.).... Taylor v. Combs Mont.)...

474 | Werner v. Alexander (Mont.).............1198 Taylor, Globe Exp. Co. v. (Colo.)..

717 | West v. Board of Com’rs of Caddo County Taylor, Hall v. (Okl.).....

373

(Okl.) .......::::: Taylor' v. Pacific Electric R. Co. (Ca 119 West, State v. (Mont.)..... ......1198 Taylor y. Spokane (Wash.)....... 478 West End Consol. Mining Co., Jim Butler Terry v. Haynes (Okl.). ......

Tonopah Mining Co. v. (Nev.)......... 876 Theiler v. Tillamook County (Or.)..

Western Indemnity Co. v. State Industrial Thompson v. Denver (Colo.).......... 309

Acc. Commission (Cal.). ................1033 Thorpe, Kynaston v. (Idaho)....... 790 Western Lumber Co., Doyle v. (Mont.).. 1197 Throop, Kasparek v. (Kan.).....

Western Silo Co. v. Carter (Kan.)....... Thurman v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).........1124 Western Townsite Co., Latshaw v.' (Wash.) 248 Tierney v. Mill & Smeltermen's Union Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Garrett (Mont.) ......

....1198 (Okl.) Tiger v. Ward (Okl.)....

941 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Orr (Okl.).....1139 Tillamook County, Theiler v. (Or.)....... 804 Westlake v, Keating Gold Mining Co. Tillman, State v. (Mont.).....

(Mont.) : .........: Title Guaranty & Surety Co., Lyman v. Wheeler, Crouse v. (Colo.)...

........1100 (Utah) ......,

.. 423 | Whipple's Estate, Milner Bank & Trust Title Guaranty & Surety Co. of Scranton, Co. v. (Colo.)...... Pa., Sauve v. (Idaho).................,

Whitaker, Board of Com’rs of McIntosh Todd y, Lewis (Wash.)........ .1006 County v. (Okl.)....

........1136 Tompkins, Atlas Coal Co. v. (Kan.).....1106 ! White y. East Side Mill & Lumber Co. Toogood, Conaway v. (Cal.)....

200 (Or.) ..... Toomey, Harold v. (Wash.)...

986 White v. East Side Mill & Lumber Co. Topeka Bridge & Iron Co. v. Board of (Or.) .

......
......

527 Com'rs of Labette County (Kan.)....... 8 White v. Hocker (Okl.)....

440 Town of Caddo, Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. White v. Houser (Kan.).......... (Okl.) .....

White, Schmitt v. (Cal.)...

216 Town of Red Rock, Dunagan v. (Okl.)....1170 Whitehead v. Spriggs (Okl.)........ 439 Town of Springfield, Klovdahl v. (Or.).... 668 Whitworth, State v. (Kan.)..

12 Town of Walters v. Orth (Okl.).....

352 Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. Robinson Townsend v. Chamberlain (Or.) ..

664 (Okl.) ..

........... 893 Trabern, Board of Com’rs of Garvin Coun. Wichita Union Terminal R. Co., Crane Co. ty v. (Okl.).......

v. (Kan.)......

59 Travelers' Ins. Co., Postler v. (Cal.)..... .1022 Wichita Water Co. v. Wichita (Kan.).. Tripp v. Deupree (Okl.)....

923 Wilber, Gussenhoven v. (Mont.)....... ...1198 Tripp v. English (Okl.). .

912 Wilcoxon, Koch v. (Cal. App.)....... ..1045 Tronsrud v. Puget Sound Traction. Light Wildrick, Rector v. (Okl.)............. .. 610 & Power Co. (Wash.)........ 348 Wiley, Ex parte (Ariz.)...........

135 Troy, In re (Or.). ..... 172 | Wiley v. State (Ariz.)...........

135 Truax, People v. (Cal. App.).

510 | Wilkison, People v. (Cal. App.)...... ..1067 Trujillo v. Sandoval (N. M.) ..

.1088 Wilky, Hurley y. (Ariz.).... Tucker v. Cooper (Cal.). .....

Williams, Wingett V. (Colo.).............!

. 139 Tullock v. Daboling (Okl.).

908 | Williamson, Hoke v. (Kan.)...... ..1115 Twist v. Colonial Trust Co. (Okl.)........ 938 Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. King Tyrrell, Shaffer v. (Okl.)......

.. 626 (Okl.) ...............................1142

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

475

23

...

[ocr errors]

Page

Page Wilson, Ex parte (Cal. App.)......, ...1050 | Wright, Elijah v. (Mont.)........ Wilson v. Lucas (Colo.)....

....1197 Wright v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).......... 290 Wilson, Maness v. (Okl.)..

370 Wrightsman, Letcher v. (Okl.)...

.......1152 Wilson' v. Zutavern (Kan.)..

231 Wyandt Mortg. & Inv. Co., Humphrey v. Wingard, State v. (Wash.).

(Kan.) ...... Wingett v. Williams (Colo.)....

139 Winton Motorcar Co., Rothweiler v. Yates Center Nat. Bank, Phillips v. (Kan.) 23 (Wash.) ...

737 Yosemite Lumber Co., Gibbons v. (Cal.).. 196 Wiswell (v. Beck (Wash.)......

976 | Young v. Boyd (Okl.).. Witt v. Boothe (Kan.)......

851 Young, Farish v. (Ariz.)................. 845 Wold, Federal Const. Co. v. (Cal. App.).. 310 Wolf, Davenport v. (Okl.).... 382 Zahn v. Obert (Okl.).......

351 Woodward v. Utter (Idaho)....... 492 Zalaback v. Kingfisher (Okl.)...

926 Woolf v. Gray (Utah)..... 788 | Zutavern, Wilson v. (Kan.)......

231

.......1199

...

(oki..............

REHEARINGS DENIED

(Cases in which rehearings have been denied, without the rendition of a written opinion, since the publication of the original opinions in previous volumes of this Reporter.]

COLORADO.

NEVADA. Colorado Gold Dredging Co. v. Stearns-Roger Burrus v. Nevada-California-Oregon Ry., 145 Mfg. Co., 153 P. 765.

P. 926. Dawley v. Dawley's Estate, 152 P. 1171. Coppermines Co. v. Comins, 148 P. 349. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell, 152 P. First Nat. Bank of San Francisco V. Nye 1175.

County, 145 P. 932. International Trust Co. v. Palisade Light, Heat Quinn v. Small, 143 P. 1053. & Power Co., 153 P. 1002.

| Ryan v. Manhattan, 145 P. 907, Irvine v. Minshull, ,152 P. 1150.

State v. Cole, 151 P. 944.
KANSAS.

OKLAHOMA.
Gilmore v. Hoskinson, 157 P. 426.

Carpenter v. Mead, 153 P. 658. Heavey v. Leavenworth Terminal Ry. & Bridge Chicago, R. I, & P. R. Co. v. Holliday, 145 P. Co., 156 P. 699.

786. Miely v. Metzger, 156 P. 753.

Martindale v. Shaba, 151 P. 1019. Pyles v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 155 P. Rogers v. Oklahoma City, 145 P. 357.

788. Stramel v. Hawes, 154 P. 232.

WASHINGTON. Todd v. Grovier Produce Co., 157 P. 389. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. Rudebeck, 156

P. 831.

THE

PACIFIC REPORTER

VOLUME 158

(93 Kan. 309)

Appeal from District Court, Shawnee DOTY et al. . SHEPARD et al. (No. 20215.) County. (Supreme Court of Kansas. June 10, 1916.)

Action by M. R. Doty and another against

D. S. Shepard and others. From judgment (Syllabus by the Court.)

for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed. 1 APPEAL AND ERROR 783(2)—GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL-MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL.

Waters & Waters and T. M. Lillard, all of Failure to file a motion for a new trial, or Topeka, for appellants. E. A. Austin, of Tofiling such motion out of time, does not justify peka, and J. T. Pringle, of Burlingame, for the dismissal of an appeal, but merely restricts

appellees. the scope of the review of the cause which is appealed. [Ed. Note. For other cases, see Appeal and

DAWSON, J. All of the matters involved Error, Cent. Dig. $ 3125 ; Dec. Dig. 783(2).) in this lawsuit except one are already res 2. APPEAL AND ERROR 891-PROCEEDINGS judicata. Railroad Co. v. Thisler, 96 Kan.

ON APPEAL-INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL 184, Syl. par. 2, 150 Pac. 580. When this case
EVIDENCE.
The interpretation of section 580 of the Civ. Las

was here before (Doty v. Shepard, 92 Kan. il Code (Gen. St. 1909. § 6175) announced in 122, 139 Pac. 1183; Id., 92 Kan. 1041, 141 Hess v. Conway, 93 Kan. 246, 144 Pac. 205, is | Pac. 1013), it was said: followed.

“We find nothing wrong with the referee's [Ed. Note. For other cases, see Appeal and findings of fact, which were approved by the Error, Cent. Dig. 8 3625; Dec. Dig. Om 891.) trial court, but it should also be ascertained 3. MORTGAGES 213-RECOVERY OF Posses- and found what the rights of Nellie P. Shepard SION-FULFILLMENT OF CONTRACT.

are in the Tabor property. When this is done, When possession of property is held by a and the result added to the findings already creditor under an agreement that he will recon- | Diade, the rights of the parties can easily be devey when he has been fully reimbursed by rents termined." Page 128 of 92 Kan., page 1185 of and profits for funds advanced and for taxes and 139 Pac. incidental expenses paid by him, the debtor is The district court sent the case to the refentitled to recover possession when the creditors'

eree, who made the following findings of claims are satisfied. (Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Mortgages,

fact and conclusions of law: Cent. Dig. 88 482-491, 1576; Dec. Dig. Om

"In addition to the findings and conclusions included in the report already made by me in

this action, I find from the evidence that on or 4. QUIETING TITLE 10(5)–RIGHT OF AC

about the 19th day of August, 1889, H. D, ShepTION.

ard, the husband of the defendant D. S. Shepard When title to property is held by a person

and the father of the defendant Nellie P. Shepnamed by the creditor under the circumstances

ard, purchased at sheriff's sale in Osage county, suggested in syllabus paragraph 3, an action to

Kan., lots 12, 13, 14, and 15 in block 18 in the quiet the debtor's title will lie when the creditor

city of Burlingame, and had the same conveyed has been fully reimbursed.

by the sheriff of Osage county to one Max Buek [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Quieting Title, for the sum of $1,251; that the purchase price Cent. Dig. $ 41; Dec. Dig. ew10(5).]

was paid by the said H. D. Shepard; that after5. Trusts 134–TITLE OF TRUSTEE.

wards and on the 7th day of November, 1889, One who holds title to property for another, the said Max Buek and his wife executed and without personal interest therein, holds title delivered a quitclaim deed by which they cononly to such legal and equitable interests in the veyed said realty to one Loren A. Dutton; that property as were vested in his cestui que trust. said Dutton paid nothing for the said convey(Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Trusts, Cent.

ance and has never had possession of said real Dig. $ 177; Dec. Dig. Ow134.)

estate or claimed any interest therein; that aft

erwards and on the 25th day of January, 1906, 6. DEEDS 121-QUITCLAIM DEED-RIGHTS the said Loren A. Dutton executed and deliverOF GRANTEE.

ed a quitclaim deed by which he conveyed said One who acquires title to property by quit- real estate to the defendant Nellie P. Shepard. claim deed and without personal consideration “II. That said Nellie P. Shepard paid no conholds only the estate of the party through whom sideration for said conveyance and the said bis title was acquired, and if that estate was de- Loren A. Dutton received nothing therefor. feasible or terminable, and the conditions under “III. That after the purchase of said properwhich it might be defeated or terminated have ty at the sheriff's sale in August, 1889, as heretranspired, the title of the grantee under the inbefore found, the said H. D. Shepard went quitclaim deed cannot prevail against one having into the possession thereof and collected the a valid claim to the property.

rents and profits thereof until his death, which [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Deeds, Cent. I occurred in the year 1904. Dig. $$ 394-400; Dec. Dig. 121.)

· "IV. That after the death of said H. D. SkepFor otber cases see samo topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and laderes 158 P.-1

[ocr errors]

ard, the defendant D. S. Shepard, who is the evidence are foreclosed. So, too, any claim mother of the defendant Nellie P. Shepard, col, that Nellie P. Shepard was entitled to be sublected the rents from the said real property until the month of March, 1910, upon which date the

rogated to the rights of a mortgagee for the defendant M. R. Doty took possession thereof, mortgage placed on the property by Dutton as I have already reported in the original re- while he held the title for Nellie P. Shepard's port filed in this action. "V. That when said H. D. Shepard purchased

father was either presented or waived; for, the said real property as hereinbefore found, he when parties are engaged in a lawsuit, all agreed with M. Ř. Doty and C. E. Doty to ad- the incidents of the controversy must be vance the money for the purchase price_thereof pleaded and pressed that there be an end of and to reconvey the property to M. R. Doty or C. E. Doty at any time that they should pay

litigation. The findings of fact do not show, him the amount that he was required to pay and it certainly cannot be presumed, that for the same, together with the interest there- this mortgage was for the benefit of Doty. on. There was no time fixed for the repayment

A motion is made by new counsel in this of the said purchase money. The money was to be paid to the said Shepard and the reconvey

case to introduce additional evidence in this ance made whenever the said Dotys demanded it. | court not considered below. This cannot be

allowed. Hess v. Conway, 93 Kan. 246, 144 "Conclusion of Law.

Pac. 205. We have looked into this proffered "The Supreme Court has decided in this ac evidence, however, and it only shows that tion that, when H. D. Shepard purchased the

while the naked legal title was in Dutton he said real property as I have hereinbefore found, he held it simply for the purpose of security for mortgaged the property, and later, on his dethe purchase money advanced by him, and that mand, H, D. Shepard paid off the mortgage, after he had remained in possession of the same taking an assignment thereof in the

e taking an assignment thereof in the name of and collected rents and profits sufficient to repay him the purchase money and interest there

| another kinsman. Counsel for appellant ason, after deducting taxes and other legitimate sures us that this mortgage has been paid, but expenses, this claim to the property was satisfied we cannot see that Doty's rights are in any and the Dotys were entitled to a decree quieting

wise affected by this mortgage. title to the property as against the said Shepard. I am, of course, bound by that decision, and I

| (3-6] Nellie P. Shepard and her predecestherefore recommend as a conclusion of law that sors in the chain of quitclaim conveyances, the plaintiffs' title be quieted against Nellie P.

Hie: Dutton and Buek, holding as they did withShepard because she has never paid anything for the property, and is therefore not a bona fide out consideration and merely for the conpurchaser for value. She has not been in the venience of H. D. Shepard, had no interest in open, notorious, and exclusive possession of the this property except that of naked title holdproperty, claiming to be the owner thereof for

ers for H. D. Shepard. Johnson v. Williams, a period of 15 years, and therefore the 15 years' statute of limitations cannot avail her

37 Kan. 179, 182, 14 Pac. 537, 1 Am. St. Rep, in this action."

243; Goddard v. Donaha, 42 Kan. 754, 756,

22 Pac. 708. Since the interest of H. D. The district court gave judgment accord

Shepard and that of his estate and of his ingly. These findings of the referee were filed

heirs terminated when sufficient rents had

been collected to reimburse him for moneys March 7, 1915. A motion for a new trial was filed on March 31, 1915. The appellee con

paid out on Doty's account, Nellie P. Sheptends that this was too late. In Bank v. Re

ard is no longer entitled to hold the legal tifining Co., 91 Kan. 434, 438, 139 Pac. 587, it

tle against the Dotys. That there has been was said that a finding of fact by a referee

such full reimbursement is foreclosed by the has the effect of a special verdict, and such

original findings of fact: is the language of the statute. Civ. Code, S8 “XXIV. Up to about the 25th day of March, 300, 305, 306 (Gen. St. 1909, 88 5894, 5899,

| 1907, H. D. Shepard and D. S. Shepard collect5900); Savage v. Challiss et al., 4 Kan. 319, and the Doty store building in sums sufficient,

ed rents and profits from the Tabor property Syl. par. 2. Even if this point be overlooked, if properly applied, to repay the purchase monand if it should be held that the motion for ey, with interest, which was advanced by H. D. a new trial was not due until the district

Shepard at the time of the purchase of said

property after deducting all of the taxes paid, court gave judgment on the referee's findings, all of the insurance paid, and all amounts exstill the findings of fact must stand, since no pended for repairs made by the Shepards, and motion for a new trial was filed after the interest thereon." judgment was entered. [1, 2] But the failure to file a motion for a

Under the arrangement between H. D. new trial, or merely filing such motion too

Shepard and M. R. Doty, Shepard was entilate for consideration, does not necessitate

tled to the possession, rents, and profits and the dismissal of an appeal. It merely limits

his successive title holders, Buek, Dutton, the scope of the review. Perkins v. Accident and Nellie P. Shepard, were entitled to hold Ass'n, 96 Kan. 553, 555, 152 Pac. 786. In the title until March 25, 1907, and this acsuch case, however, we must take the facts. tion was begun on March 26, 1910; conseas determined and test the accuracy of the quently, all discussion of the statute of limjudgment thereon. This, however, leaves lit- itations is irrelevant. tle to discuss in this case. Here all questions The judgment is affirmed. All the Justices

« 이전계속 »