 | Samuel Comyn - 1824 - 680 페이지
...the merchant was answerable for the deceit of his factor, though not criminaliter yet civiliter; for seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reasonable that he who employs and puts a trust and confidence in the deceiver should be a loser than a stranger: and... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1841 - 922 페이지
...merchant was answerable for the deceit of his factor, though not criminaliter, yet civiliter; for, seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reason that he that employs and pub a trust and confidence in the deceiver should be a loser than a... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1847 - 988 페이지
...The merchant is answerable for the deceit of his factor, through not criminaliter yet civiliter ; for seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reasonable that he who employs and puts a trust in the deceiver, should be a loser than a stranger." (»') The consequence... | |
 | William Paley - 1847 - 732 페이지
...merchant was answer[*303] able for the deceit of his factor, though not *criminaliter yet civiliter ; for seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reason that he that employs and confides in the deceiver should be a loier than a stranger.(u) 4. The... | |
 | 1862 - 802 페이지
...merchant was answerable for the deceit of his factor, though not criiainaliler, yet civililer ; for seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reason that he that employs and puts a trust and confidence in the deceiver should be a loser than... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1864 - 668 페이지
...misrepresenting the article. The principal was held liable ; " for," said the lord chief justice, " seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reasonable Farmers and Mechanics' Bank, of Kent Co., v. Butchers and Drovers' Bank that he who employs and puts... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1871 - 726 페이지
...v. Schuyler.\\ It was explicitly laid down by Lord Holt, in Hern v. Nichols.^ He there said : " For seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reason that he that employs and puts trust and confidence in the deceiver should be a loser than a... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1872 - 732 페이지
...or apparent, to make such representations, but for reasons entirely different. In Hern v. NicholsJ the leading case on the subject, where an agent, authorized...liable. Lord Holt there said : ' Seeing somebody must be loser by this deceit, it is more reasonable that -he that employs and puts a confidence in the deceiver... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 페이지
...the merchant was answerable for the deceit of his factor, though not criminal,itfr, yet cwili/er; for seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reason that he that employs and puts a trust and confidence in the deceiver should be a loser than... | |
| |
... for seeing somebody must be a loser by this deceit, it is more reason that he that employs and puts a trust and confidence in the deceiver should be a loser, than a stranger. 
