 Territories and any foreign nation or nations, shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...  United States Supreme Court Reports - 415 페이지저자: United States. Supreme Court - 1912전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 페이지
...injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employe, to his or her personal representative for the benefit...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe; and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent... | |
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 페이지
...provided in the federal act is that the liability of the carrier in case of the death of the employe is "to his or her personal representative for the benefit of the surviving widow," &c., and the United States Supreme Court has interpreted that language to mean the executor or general... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 806 페이지
...section: "SEC. 9. That any right of action, given by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." US Comp. Stat. 1913, § 8665.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 페이지
...injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employe, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe ; and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and if none, then the next of kin dependent... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1917 - 724 페이지
...liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his...surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents or employees of such... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1918 - 716 페이지
...liable in damages to any person suffering injury "while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative," etc. It is the employment that determines whether or not the injury to the employee is within the purview... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1917 - 780 페이지
...liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his...such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's 244 US Opinion of the Court. parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee,... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1918 - 638 페이지
...wrongful death of their employees engaged in that business for the benefit of three classes : "(1) The surviving widow or husband and children of such employee; and, if none, (2) then of such employee's Rep.] April Term, 1917. parents; and, if none, (3) then of the next of... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 페이지
...representatives for wrongful death. The federal statute in question, so far as pertinent, reads as follows: "In case of the death of such employee, to his or...of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." 35 US Stats, at Large, 65, C. 149; passed April 22, 1908. It is quite evident that much depends upon... | |
| |
